New Report Shows Depression and Anxiety Are Prevalent at Harvard Law
Harvard Law administrators have vowed to do more to support student mental health and wellness after a 2017 survey showed that many struggle with depression and anxiety.
December 30, 2019 at 03:07 PM
4 minute read
The long-awaited results of a 2017 mental health survey show that many students at Harvard Law School experience depression and anxiety and don't get enough sleep or exercise.
The school in late December released a report to students and members of the law school community with selected findings from the more than two-year-old survey after several years of lobbying from activists pushing for better mental health supports on campus.
Among survey respondents—which comprised about 44% of all students at the time—35% screened positive for mild depression; nearly 16% screened positive for moderate depression; and about 9% screened positive for either moderately severe depression or severe depression, according to the report. That means about 60% of respondents reported some signs of depression.
Meanwhile, 30% of the survey respondents screened positive for mild anxiety, 15% screened positive for moderate anxiety, and another 9% screened positive for severe anxiety according to the report, which was prepared by a working group on mental health formed by the law school and lead by several associate deans. The report says that rates of depression and anxiety are largely on par with—if not slightly lower—than other graduate students at Harvard who were also surveyed.
"The report provides us with a good sense of where we stand in the broader context of the profession, legal education, and graduate education more generally," law dean John Manning wrote in an email to students. "Through a series of thoughtful recommendations, the Working Group also lays out an initial framework for addressing the mental health and well-being challenges on our campus. They further identify some things we can do right away to improve student well-being."
Harvard law students are hardly alone in dealing with mental health and wellness challenges. A 2014 survey of 3,000 law students on 15 campuses found that 37% of respondents screened positive for anxiety and 14% of them met the definition of severe anxiety. Among those survey respondents, 18% had been diagnosed with depression, with one out of six being diagnosed while in law school. More than half of the surveyed students also reported getting drunk at least once in the past 30 days.
Many of the Harvard survey respondents also reported poor health and wellness practices. More than 40% of them said they don't feel rested when they wake up most days; nearly 81% don't meet the American Heart Association's exercise guidelines; and more than 37% screened positive for problem drinking.
That, too, mirrors other research on law student wellness. The 2019 Law School Survey of Student Engagement, which included survey responses from 18,000 students at 70 law schools across the country, found that 51% of women said they were sleeping five hours or less per night, as were 43% of men. Similarly, 70% of women and 60% of men said they spend five hours or less a week exercising.
Harvard Law School introduced some new mental health resources in the wake of the 2017 survey, including drop-in counseling sessions on the law school campus and expanded mental health training for those who advise students. But the report recommends additional services, such as pushing for the elimination of mental health questions on bar admission applications and ensuring students know what resources are available.
"Although we can never eliminate stress or worry entirely, we can aspire to reduce the stigma associated with mental health challenges, to help students better care for themselves and their peers, and to provide the robust continuum of wellness and mental health resources that students need to thrive at HLS," the report reads.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Everything From A to Z': University GCs Tested by Legal, Financial, Societal Challenges
6 minute read'A Horrible Reputation for Bad Verdicts': Plaintiffs Attorney Breaks Down $129M Wrongful-Death Verdict From Conservative Venue
How Uncertainty in College Athletics Compensation Could Drive Lawsuits in 2025
'Basic Arithmetic': Court Rules in Favor of LA Charter School Denied Funding by California Education Department
Trending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250