Critical Mass: 2020 Rings In Roundup Trials. A Trojan Horse in the USC Sex Assault Settlement? Find Out Who Got Appointed to Lead Juul Lawsuits.
Another round of Roundup trials are ready for next year.
December 31, 2019 at 03:01 PM
6 minute read
Happy New Year! Welcome to Critical Mass, Law.com's weekly briefing for class action and mass tort attorneys. Another round of Roundup trials are ready for 2020. A last-minute lawyer fight erupts over the USC sex assault settlement. Who got appointed to lead the Juul lawsuits? Feel free to reach out to me with your input. You can email me at [email protected], or follow me on Twitter: @abronstadlaw.
(A note to my readers: In the Dec. 18 emailed version of Critical Mass, I misidentified Leslie Brueckner's employer in a write-up about the Roundup appeal. She is at Public Justice.)
After California, Monsanto Moves On To Missouri
Lawyers anticipate another round of Roundup trials in early 2020.
So far: Juries in California, in state and federal courts, have awarded $80 million, $289 million and $2 billion verdicts (all later reduced). Monsanto, now owned by Bayer, got a boost this month when the U.S. Justice Department and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency filed a brief supporting its appeal before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Seven states, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and several other groups also filed briefs.
In 2020: Missouri, home of Monsanto's headquarters, could have its first Roundup trials starting in January. Judges in state courts have scheduled trials for Jan. 21, Jan. 27 and March 30. California also has state court trials set for Jan. 17 and Jan. 24. The next federal trial is on Feb. 10 in San Francisco.
By the way: Earlier this month, federal authorities arrested Timothy Litzenburg, a former lawyer at The Miller Firm in Orange, Virginia, a lead plaintiff's firm in Roundup trials. The feds charged Litzenburg with potential extortion of $200 million in so-called "consulting fees" from a "Company 1," which manufactures a chemical used in Roundup. Here's the charging document, which references in a footnote that The Miller Law Firm sued Litzenburg in 2018 after he "actively began to surreptitiously steal The Miller Law Firm's confidential information and trade secrets." (Reuters has more on that here). I reached out to Michael Miller, founder of The Miller Firm, who told me in an email:
"Mr. Litzenburg was formerly an employee of the Miller Firm who was fired in August of 2018. We understand Mr. Litzenburg was recently indicted for conduct occurring in October and November of 2019. Mr. Litzenburg has nothing whatsoever to do with The Miller Firm LLC nor The Miller Firm LLC with Mr. Litzenburg. We will not comment any further on Mr. Litzenburg's legal troubles."
Lawyer Clash in USC Sex Assault Class Action
Lawyers are due in court on Jan. 6 for final approval of a $240 million class action settlement with the University of Southern California over its former campus gynecologist, George Tyndall, accused of sexually abusing nearly 18,000 women over a period of 27 years.
In November, interim class counsel—Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein and Girard Sharp—called the settlement, which includes a $215 million cash fund, "the largest-ever class resolution of sexual assault claims." They noted there were no objectors and, according to a Dec. 23 reply, only 801 class members opted out.
But that still appeared to be too many. In a Nov. 26 filing, plaintiffs' lawyer Annika Martin (Lieff Cabraser) sought a "curative notice" to stop attorney Samuel Wong (Aegis Law Firm) from continuing to solicit class members on LinkedIn by making "false and misleading statements" that their identities would be made public if they participated in the settlement. Fong fired back on Dec. 16, calling the allegations "baseless" and insisting that class counsel were misquoting him. "Although the advertisement is not very artfully written and further clarification could help, the advertisement does not say what interim class counsel claims it says," he wrote.
Who Got the Work?
A federal judge appointed 21 lawyers to lead the lawsuits against electronic cigarette maker Juul Labs. In a Dec. 20 order, U.S. District Judge William Orrick appointed four lawyers to serve as co-lead counsel: Sarah London (Lieff Cabraser), Dena Sharp (Girard Sharp), Ellen Relkin (Weitz & Luxenberg) and Dean Kawamoto (Keller Rohrback). Orrick had named those same four lawyers as interim co-leads last month. London had sought a leadership team of 22 lawyers. Khaldoun Baghdadi (Walkup, Melodia) and Leslie LaMacchia (Pulaski Kherkher) will serve as federal/state liaison counsel, and Thomas Cartmell (Wagstaff & Cartmell) as liaison counsel to government entities. The 14-person steering committee includes six women.
Here's what else is happening:
J&J Wins Jury: Johnson & Johnson won another talcum powder verdict, this time in Missouri. A jury in St. Louis, where Johnson & Johnson lost a $4.7 billion talcum powder verdict in 2018, found on Dec. 21 that its baby powder did not cause a woman's ovarian cancer. Allison Brown (Skadden Arps) and Michael Brown (Nelson Mullins) scored the win for Johnson & Johnson in a case brought by Ted Meadows and David Dearing (Beasley Allen), Allen Smith (The Smith Law Firm) and Michelle Parfitt (Ashcraft & Gerel).
Cymbalta Restart? Plaintiffs who lost an appeal over certification of a class action involving the antidepressant Cymbalta plan to ask the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to reopen their case at Jan. 6 oral arguments. Eli Lilly & Co. had successfully sought dismissal under the U.S. Supreme Court's 2017 decision in Microsoft v. Baker, which struck down a procedural tactic in which a plaintiff voluntarily dismissed a case to appeal class certification orders. In 2018, U.S. District Judge Stephen Wilson refused to set aside the plaintiffs' original dismissal in the Cymbalta case, prompting Monday's appeal.
Crushing It: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit rejected two class actions: a nationwide employment case alleging gender bias against Microsoft, and a California case alleging Diet Dr Pepper's name is misleading. In the Microsoft case, the Ninth Circuit on Dec. 24 upheld an order refusing to certify a class of 8,600 female employees alleging the software company systematically paid and promoted men more often than women. In a Dec. 30 order, the Ninth Circuit found that the word "diet" in Diet Dr Pepper did not mislead consumers into believing they could lose weight. Lynne Hermle (Orrick) won for Microsoft, and Evan Young (Baker Botts) for Dr Pepper.
Biden Boosters: Prominent plaintiffs' attorneys make up some of the 250 top volunteer fundraisers for Joe Biden's presidential campaign, defined as those who give at least $25,000 to the Democratic candidate. Among the top contributors are Thomas Girardi (Girardi Keese), John Morgan (Morgan & Morgan), Russell Budd (Baron & Budd), Mikal Watts (Watts Guerra) and Arthur Luxenberg and Perry Weitz (Weitz & Luxenberg).
Thanks for reading Critical Mass, and a Happy New Year! I will be back next week.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1ACC CLO Survey Waves Warning Flags for Boards
- 2States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 3Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 4Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 5Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250