Mirror Image: In 2020, the Busiest Practice Areas May Be More of the Same
Firms are likely to invest their extra dollars into safer practice areas, rather than gambling on something new.
January 02, 2020 at 02:00 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
For much of 2020, expect the legal industry to mirror 2019. Law firms will continue to invest in countercyclical practice areas as major events—namely, an anticipated economic downturn and the 2020 U.S. presidential election—loom in later months.
"We will likely see a continuation of what's already started—firms stockpiling bankruptcy talent—which is related more to the assumption that a recession is coming," says Joseph Altonji, a co-founding partner of consulting firm Law Vision Group. He says that as M&A and private equity practices cool off, there will be increased activity in the bankruptcy, restructuring, labor and employment and real estate spaces. These practice areas have already been attracting attention for some time; bankruptcy lateral moves in 2019 outpaced both 2017 and 2018, according to ALM data.
"For the short term, the uncertainty means business as usual," Altonji says.
Law firms are still reaping the benefits of years of economic expansion. But with growing anxieties about an economic slowdown or recession, firms in 2020 are likely to invest those extra dollars into safer practice areas, rather than gambling on something new.
"Firms, especially big, global Am Law firms, try to think about how to be recession- and downturn-proof with more balanced practices," says David Walden, managing director of legal recruiter E.P. Dine.
Walden identifies corporate restructuring, bankruptcy, finance, certain types of litigation and intellectual property as areas ripe for expansion in the coming year.
"These all tend to be, as far as practice areas, in even higher demand now than they have been in the last 10 years due to expansive economies," he says. He also expects that the health care, data privacy and insurance spaces will see some growth, while transactional and M&A work will slow.
Avery Ellis, a California-based recruiter at Mestel & Co., says that, on the West Coast, he's still seeing demand for practice areas tied to a strong economy, such as M&A, real estate, finance and corporate work, and not as much of an interest yet in countercyclical practices.
"When I talk to [West Coast] law firm leaders, they're mildly optimistic about the year closing out and have, with some hesitation, optimism about the upcoming year," he says. Similar to his East Coast counterparts, however, Ellis expects more of the same on the West Coast in 2020.
"We're more steady and stable out in California," he says. "I'm anticipating 2020 to be somewhat like 2019."
The 2020 presidential election has given firms reason to take a wait-and-see approach as they sort out their priorities for the coming year.
"The country is making a set of economic choices in the next election, more significant than any other election that we've had recently," Altonji says. "There are potential radical changes to the economy, especially compared to what President Trump has been doing in terms of tax cuts and deregulation."
With more than a dozen Democratic candidates still in the running for the party's nomination, legal experts say it is too early to be sure what practice areas could be affected and how much. But the election of a Democratic president would all but certainly mean a rewrite of the tax code and a departure from the Trump administration's deregulation agenda, as well as changes to health care and immigration—all potential growth opportunities for firms later in the year.
"However the election plays out, to an extent it appears that, in the short term, there will be a quieting of some business activity until there's increased clarity about who will be president," Altonji says.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBosworth Claims It Was Kline & Specter, Not Him, That Breached Settlement Terms
4 minute readClimate Groups Demonstrate Outside A&O Shearman and Akin London Offices
CSX Joins Rest of Big Four Railroad Companies in Installing New Generation of Legal Leadership
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250