Report: Plaintiffs in Employment Cases Won Class Certification at Record Rates in 2019
Seyfarth Shaw's 16th annual report on workplace class action litigation found that plaintiffs were securing class certification at record rates last year: 81% in wage and hour cases, 65% for ERISA, and 64% for employment discrimination.
January 07, 2020 at 04:29 PM
3 minute read
Plaintiffs in employment cases scored wins on class certification motions at record rates last year, according to a new report from Seyfarth Shaw.
The firm's 16th annual report on workplace class action litigation, which analyzed 1,467 decisions in cases brought against employers in federal and state courts across the country, found that in 2019 plaintiffs secured conditional class certification rulings in 81% of wage and hour cases, 65% of ERISA cases, and 64% of employment discrimination cases.
The Seyfarth report, edited by Gerald "Jerry" Maatman Jr., the co-chair of the firm's class action litigation practice group, found that though plaintiffs won these "first-stage" certification motions at a record clip, employers had increasing success in winning "second-stage" decertification motions—12 of 25 rulings, or about 48%, a 6 percentage point increase over 2018.
The report says that the trend reflects "an on-going migration of skilled plaintiffs' class action lawyers in the wage & hour litigation space" that's been going on for almost a decade. Securing conditional certification, the report concludes, can be done quickly, soon after a case is filed with minimal investment in things such as experts and extensive discovery.
"As a result, to the extent of class actions and collective actions and collective actions by plaintiffs' lawyers is viewed as an investment of time and money, prosecution of wage & hour lawsuits is a relatively low cost investment, without significant barrier to entry, and with the prospect of immediate returns as compared to other types of workplace class action litigation," the report says.
Other key takeaways from the report include:
- Epic Systems v. Lewis, a case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2018 holding that class action waivers in mandatory arbitration agreements are legal, proved to be "a transformative decision that is one of the most important workplace class action rulings in the last two decades." The report said the decision could continue to shift the prosecution and defense of workplace class actions going forward.
- As measured by the top 10 largest settlements in various workplace categories, the overall amount of workplace settlements increased slightly to $1.34 billion, compared to $1.32 billion in 2018. Both those numbers fall well short of the $2.72 billion posted in 2017. The Seyfarth report concludes that the Epic Systems decision is causing a similar trend as to what was seen after the Supreme Court's 2011 decision in Wal-Mart v. Dukes tightened the standard for class certification.
- A high proportion of federal wage and hour cases are being brought against employers in jurisdictions regarded as plaintiff-friendly including the Second and Ninth Circuits. For the first time in a decade, however, the report found that there were an equal number of rulings out of the Fifth and Sixth Circuits, where conditional class certification rulings also tended to favor workers over employers. The Sixth Circuit—which encompasses Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio and Tennessee—had as many class certifications (36) as the Second Circuit and five more than the Ninth and Fifth Circuits (31).
The entire 750-plus page report can be requested at workplaceclassactionreport.com.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllManhattan Prosecutors Say They Will Oppose Efforts by Trump Legal Team to Dismiss Case
'We’re Here to Empower People to Make Good Decisions': Why Compliance Chiefs Must Learn to Think Like a Businessperson
Lawyers Among Those Convicted as Hong Kong's High Court Sentences 45 Activists to Prison
Apple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Senators Grill Visa, Mastercard Execs on Alleged Anti-Competitive Practices, Fees
- 2Deal Watch: Gibson Dunn, V&E, Kirkland Lead Big Energy Deals in Another Strong Week in Transactions
- 3Advisory Opinion Offers 'Road Map' for Judges Defending Against Campaign Attacks
- 4Commencement of Child Victims Act at Heart of Federal Question Posed to NY's Top Court
- 5Bolstering Southern California Presence, Sidley Austin Settles Into Revitalized Downtown LA Office
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250