Agencies willing to partner with an investor, bring in an operations manager, and install consistent workflows and marketing tools built around readily available technology will grow and succeed — a much better bet than selling the firm. This according to Billy R. Williams, CEO of the Williams Family Investment Group and president of Inspire a Nation Business Mentoring Services. Williams spoke in October 2019 at the Fort Worth meeting of Agents Council for Technology, a working group within the Independent Insurance Agents and Brokers of American, Inc. (Big "I") . ACT's mission is to bring all independent agent and broker distribution stakeholders together to advance the use of the most effective agency workflow technologies which enhance productivity, sales & marketing, service, and security. Williams' firm purchases 15% to 20% of an agency and said, with his system, he can make the agency an extra $10,000 per month. Retired from the U.S. Army, Williams has invested in more than 100 agencies. He said his military training encourages him to "track and measure everything." "If we don't track it, it doesn't exist," he said. "Until your daily process, tasks and technology use is stronger than your people, you will never have one hour of mental and physical freedom from your agency." Williams requires his partner agencies to implement six technology-related practices: |
- Make the gathering and transfer of important data possible and safe.
- Make workflows and processes more consistent to implement.
- Help the agency build, enhance and maintain the business relationship with a customer.
- Allow the agency to have more effective and consistent communication with a prospect.
- Free up agency staff and resources from tasks that can be automated so they can concentrate on tasks and processes that produce higher revenue.
- Allow the agency to generate and download various business reports in Excel or CSV.
Moreover, each of these tasks has to save or generate $1 million in a 36-month period, Williams said. "We want to do everything inside our agency management system," said Williams. "If you hear an agent say my 'management system stinks', what they really are saying is 'my processes and workflows stink'. I want my CSR to go to one central place to do everything. The reality is, that's not reality. I may want an API within my management system, but it doesn't mean it's safe or secure." Williams said the operations manager role is a "real weakness in the industry. We don't have anyone dedicated to running our business. We are great insurance agents, but we didn't come in to be great leaders or with an operations background or a CPA background." Thus, he added, part of his agreement with partner firms is to appoint or bring in an operations manager. "I want to protect my investment," he said. "But I also want someone who is not stressed over going in 20 different directions." Agency processes, he said, need to be clearly defined, consistently implemented, and regularly spot-checked — just like in the Army. He noted several tools that may require attention or an upgrade. In answer to an audience question about metrics, Williams said he prefers to look at the lead-to-close ratio versus only quote-to-close because "that tells me if my marketing is working. Am I generating enough leads? My quotes after that are telling me if I'm getting back to those leads, like am I getting them on the phone?" He looks at the close ratio by producer. "I can tell if I have a good producer or a price producer. A price producer can only quote price. If all the carriers sound the same and all offer the same kinds of coverage, the only thing I have different is price." "My good agents have a different conversation. They solve problems. They bring up solutions that our clients didn't know they had, like uninsured motorist protection." Older agency principals might not understand all these technology tools, Williams said: "You don't have to embrace everything. Just embrace what you can." A dozen of Williams' go-to insurance agency technologies are outlined in the slideshow above. This article first appeared in ACT News, a Big "I" program newsletter, and is reproduced here with permission from the organization as well as the author. See also: |
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250