University of Denver Law Settles Another Pay Discrimination Suit by Female Faculty
Associate law professor Rashmi Goel, who claimed in court that she earns $30,000 less than male colleagues, will get a pay boost as part of a settlement with the University of Denver Sturm College of Law.
January 09, 2020 at 01:43 PM
3 minute read
|
The University of Denver Sturm College of Law has agreed to increase the compensation of an associate professor who sued in June, claiming she was underpaid compared with her male and nonminority faculty colleagues, the professor's lawyer said Thursday.
The university is boosting plaintiff Rashmi Goel's annual pay; giving her an annual stipend for her work with the law school's Rocky Mountain Collective on Race, Place & Law; compensating her for back pay and emotional distress; and paying her attorney fees, said Goel's attorney, Charlotte Sweeney of the Denver firm Sweeney & Bechtold.
"I think it's a great resolution for her," said Sweeney following the Jan. 2 dismissal of the suit. "It gets her to a salary she should have been at anyway and it compensates her for the loss of salary over a period of years. Also, it recognizes that she's doing additional work, far and above many of her colleagues, on this additional project and deserved compensation for it."
Sweeney declined to specify the amount of Goel's pay increase, noting that her client is bound under a confidentiality agreement. A university spokesman confirmed the settlement Thursday.
"A mutual agreement has been reached in this case allowing both parties to move forward" reads a university statement. "One of the University of Denver's cornerstone commitments it to ensure that our academic community compensates faculty and staff fairly, equitably and based on merit. These are values that we hold in highest regard and seek, always, to model in our community."
It's the second time in under two years that the law school has agreed to increase pay for female faculty. It entered into a consent decree with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in May 2018, under which it paid $2.66 million to female law professors who for years were paid less than their male colleagues.
The EEOC sued the school in 2016, three years after longtime law professor Lucy Marsh filed a complaint alleging the school was systematically paying female faculty less than similarly situated men. In addition to Marsh, six other female law professors at the school with tenure eventually joined as plaintiffs.
Goel was not part of that suit, and didn't know of her own pay discrepancy until last February when the law school disclosed faculty salaries, according to her complaint. She alleged that she was the lowest paid of the school's 12 associate professors, despite having been on the faculty since 2002, and earned more than $30,000 less than the average salary among that cohort. Ten of those professors are male or non-Asian. Goel, who is Asian, earns between $40,000 and $50,000 less annually than other associate professors with comparable experience, according to her complaint.
Goel and the law school entered into mediation talks in December and were able to reach a settlement agreement, Sweeney said.
"Hopefully, this will put the law school on the right track," Sweeney said. "In conjunction with the consent decree that was entered in the other case, there's now a labor economist looking at them every year, and there's a monitor who is supposed to be evaluating everything annually. This should get them turned in the right direction."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'What Is Certain Is Uncertainty': Patchwork Title IX Rules Face Expected Changes in Second Trump Administration
5 minute read'No Evidence'?: Big Law Firms Defend Academic Publishers in EDNY Antitrust Case
3 minute readLaw Firms Are Turning to Online Training Platforms as Apprenticeship Model Falters
'Substantive Deficiencies': Judge Grants Big Law Motion Dismissing Ivy League Price-Fixing Claims
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Senate Democrats Advance 4th Circuit Pick Ryan Park’s Nomination
- 2Judge Rejects Meta’s Plea to Send FTC Antitrust Suit to Trash Heap
- 3How Have You Fared in 2024? Share Your Insights in the Managing Partners Survey
- 4Court Rules Mere Conduit Defense Not Suitable for a Motion to Dismiss
- 5Ironclad Officially Launches New Gen AI Assistant Jurist
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250