Wiley Rein Drops 'Rein,' Adds New Look and Moves to .Law Domain
The firm is just the latest to shorten its marketing moniker, but it says it's the first Am Law 200 firm to migrate from the "overcrowded and unregulated" .com domain.
January 15, 2020 at 05:00 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Washington, D.C.-based Wiley Rein is joining Big Law's single-name marketing blitz, rebranding as "Wiley" as it unveils a new website, logo, color scheme and .law domain.
"We decided as a partnership that the timing was right," managing partner Peter Shields said in an interview. "We have a focus on some new practices and thought it was time for our brand to reflect that."
The new Wiley made some bold aesthetic choices. Gone is the understated green and white palette that adorned wileyrein.com. In its place is a bright and bold red logo coupled with a deep purple script. It was designed to be noticed.
The colors, according to Shields, were recommended by Dharma Pachner, chief creative officer at consulting firm Contrast and Co. "He said the overall look and vibrancy reflected what he heard from the stakeholders. We never looked back," said Shields.
Those stakeholders included clients, partners, associates, staff and firm leaders, all of whom had input into the final product.
"We had various constituency groups participate in listening sessions to start," Shields said. "Our brand consultant then took that and came back to us. We were pleased with the concept and theme."
Shields said the process, from conception to completion, took about six months.
As in most law firm rebrands, a key goal behind the change was to actively reflect what the firm is now while still paying homage to the past that created it.
Shields said the firm wanted to highlight not just the practice areas it already promotes—such as its telecoms, media and technology group, election law and government ethics, government contracts, international trade and litigation—but also the firm's emerging practices around cybersecurity, drones, privacy, fintech and FTC work.
The firm is also touting its move to the .law Internet domain—which it says is a first for an Am Law 200 firm. Although it has been around for several years, the domain has not gained traction among larger firms.
The domain is reserved for law firms, and if an entity or practitioner wants to have it, they must provide proof they are in the legal services industry.
Wiley decided on .law as a differentiator from the "overcrowded and unregulated .com domain field," according to a press release.
Moving forward, the wileyrein.com site will redirect to wiley.law and all emails for the company will have the .law domain as well.
The firm had a form of soft launch over the holidays, sending the new "Wiley" brand image to clients in the form of holiday cards, chocolates and even Bluetooth speakers.
The reaction was strong and positive, and not just from clients, Shields said.
"I had a lateral come to me and say that this look and logo reflects the firm he wanted to join when he interviewed here," he said.
A parade of law firms have undertaken brand overhauls over the past year or so, including Katten Muchin Rosenman, Seyfarth Shaw, and Milbank, to name just a few.
Like many others that have shortened their names for marketing purposes, Wiley will still legally be known by the firm's full name, Wiley Rein, in what Shields said is a nod to the heritage of the firm.
"Since our founding, clients have turned to Wiley to solve their most pressing issues and anticipate the challenges that lie ahead," Shields said in a statement. "Our new brand represents who we are today—a firm with a focused mindset, interdisciplinary depth, a celebration of diversity, and a culture of collegiality."
|Read More
Katten Jumps on Rebranding Bandwagon With New Image, Website
Seyfarth Takes On New Moniker, New Look
Who's Getting Left Out as Law Firms Race to Rebrand?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSo You Want to Be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
Jones Day Client Seeks Indemnification for $7.2M Privacy Settlement, Plus Defense Costs
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250