10 Top Strategies for Retaining Tomorrow's Talent
All lawyers want to be wanted and valued by their firms. It has become apparent that tomorrow's legal talent requires even more hand-holding than previous generations. They want to understand why and what's the payoff of their efforts. By creating a firm culture that addresses these concerns you will heighten your firm's ability to retain precious talent.
January 16, 2020 at 10:06 AM
6 minute read
This article appeared in Accounting and Financial Planning for Law Firms, an ALM/Law Journal Newsletters publication covering all financial aspects of managing law firms, including: building a law firm budget; rates and rate arrangements with clients; coordinating benefits for law firm partners; and the newest strategies to grow your firm and your career.
All lawyers want to be wanted and valued by their firms. According to the famous psychologist, Abraham Maslow, everyone needs to understand how they fit in and have a sense of belonging. It has become apparent that tomorrow's legal talent requires even more hand-holding than previous generations because the "just do it" attitude, does not work. They want to understand why and what's the payoff of their efforts. By creating a firm culture that addresses these concerns you will heighten your firm's ability to retain precious talent. Following are 10 strategies your firm can implement.
- Set Expectations. Be clear about expectations related to hours, face time and how it ties to compensation and promotion. Many firms have a "black box" around how they pay their attorneys, not just partners. If you are a production focused firm then clearly state what the requirements are for minimum hours and what constitutes enough hours to hit bonus levels. If your firm is more ambiguous and you take into consideration non-billable work then create a framework that will spell it out clearly. The younger generation wants to know the rules. They want it in "black and white," to quote one associate committee member I worked with at a firm.
- Provide Opportunities. A recent analysis into employment trajectory uncovered that younger people are interested in moving around to acquire skills and experience rather than moving up in the same firm. Through exit interviews, I often hear that after two or three years attorneys are willing to move to another firm to work with clients in a different industry or practice a different type of law altogether. Offering new work experiences within your firm allows them to develop new skills and have different work experiences so they do not have to seek them elsewhere.
- Offer Challenging Work. Most lawyers like what they do and they want to continue to grow in their knowledge of the law. The youngest attorneys are no longer satisfied with document reviews for the first three years of their practice. They, like their peers in the corporate world, feel they do not have to "pay their dues" to get choice work. They want to have opportunities sooner rather than later. I recommend firms institute a work assignment system to ensure challenging assignments are distributed equitably and often.
- Create Work/Life Balance. This is a tough one. Tomorrow's talent does not want to work like the senior partners: 12 hour days or 80 hour weeks. They want to be home with their families and go hiking on the weekends. I suggest that firms review what their tolerance level is for part time, flex time or remote working relationships. I have seen firms where the hours requirements continue to creep up, leaving attorneys working harder than they signed up for when they joined. They become unhappy and eventually resign.
- Mentor Them. Mentoring is a win-win-win situation. Regular mentoring leads the mentee to professional excellence and higher morale, which fuels higher job satisfaction and quality of work. The mentor wins by feeling a sense of pride when the mentee develops into a thriving, satisfied professional. Ultimately the firm wins when it is easier to recruit, develop and retain associates. When I hear "I had no champion, so I left," my first question is whether or not the firm had a mentoring program.
- Sponsor Them. Sponsorship places greater expectations on both parties than mentorship and involves more action, trust and risk. Sponsorship focuses primarily on advancement, not on advice, guidance and information. It requires a track record of high performance and proven potential that makes the sponsor see the protégée as worthy of sponsorship. For sponsors, it is an opportunity to "pay it forward." Creating an individual sponsor plan is a critical first step.
- Teach Management Skills. Being a good manager is not easy and there are poor role models lingering in the corners. It is important for a firm to implement a robust and targeted management series to address the variety of skills needed to excel. Programs can be technical like project management skills to softer skills, but equally as important, like emotional intelligence in the work place. From my experience, attorneys might scoff at the softer skills training, but after attending they see the value in these topics.
- Assign Leadership Tasks. Just like learning to dance, but never going dancing, all the programs and initiatives a firm implements go to waste if the attorney does not get a chance to apply what they have learned. Ask your high potential talent to take on projects that will improve a practice area or the firm as whole. These can range from planning a social event to overhauling a docketing process. The key is that the attorney will rely on a team or small committee and that's where the leadership and management skills kick in.
- Recognize Contributions. Gallup, a workplace analytics firm, does research about employee satisfaction and they report that firms should recognize top performers because they need to know their efforts are valued. They also say that recognition needs to be tailored to the individual. I recommend that a firm determine to what an individual will affirmatively respond — for example, lunch with a senior leader might be a highlight or just having their name mentioned at meeting could be satisfactory. For the attorney to feel valued, the recognition needs to be meaningful to them.
- Clear a Path to Partnership. In the end, not all your legal talent wants to be a partner, however, the odds go up when they see the path and know the rules to get to that goal. When I work with attorneys on the cusp of partnership, their biggest complaint is not knowing what the firm wants. Share the criteria used for promotion to partner and guide your top talent so they can see a future with your firm. This applies to those who have already made partner as well, if they do not see their future roadmap into leadership roles they will move on.
By communicating with your talent, providing the proper tools and giving opportunities to grow along the way you are more likely to retain your attorneys so they will become the next generation of partners and leaders at your firm.
*****
Dr. Sharon Meit Abrahams, a member of the Board of Editors of LJN's Marketing the Law Firm, is a legal talent expert helping lawyers improve their performance, productivity and profitability through success coaching and interactive workshops. For over 25 years Dr. Abrahams has designed, implemented and managed every aspect lawyer development from their first day through retirement. She can be reached at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllScammers Target Lawyers Across Country With Fake Court Notices
Unlocking Your Lawyers' Rainmaking Potential: A Coaching Guide
5 Ways Small and Midsize Law Firms Can Win More Pitches (and Improve Realization Rates)
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250