What's Next? Drinking Chaperones at Your Law Firm?
Why do those of us who are not harassers or louts have to suffer just because some guys can't keep it together? Women shouldn't lose their right to get sloshed.
January 16, 2020 at 04:54 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
|
I know Americans deep down think the Brits are superior (The accent! The pageantry! The crumpets!) but I pray we don't blindly follow their ways.
First of all, the U.K. is a holy mess these days. As if Brexit isn't chaotic enough, it now looks like Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are on the brink of quitting the royal family. Instead of hanging out at Buckingham Palace, they're thinking of moving to Canada. Canada!
Imagine if we were to lose our version of the royals—like Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump deciding to vacate the White House for Alaska. Think how discombobulating that would be. (Actually, Javanka disappearing into the frozen tundra of Alaska is not an unappealing thought.)
Anyhoo, one British trend that I hope won't come to our shores is this: drinking chaperones at law firm parties. Apparently, it's a thing. Even worse, firms might start going dry altogether.
Magic Circle firm Linklaters introduced drinking chaperones this last holiday party season. According to the U.K.'s Legal Cheek, partners were asked to assign a trusted staff member "to remain booze-free—not too dissimilar to a designated driver—and supervise at work events where alcohol is being served."
In a statement given to The American Lawyer affiliate Legal Week, a Linklaters spokesperson said: "Our people work hard and we recognize the value of teams socializing together to help provide a healthy work-life balance. As part of a wider set of guidelines covering social activities, we have recommended to partners, directors and business leaders that they designate a non-drinking role to a senior person to assist the smooth running of our social events."
For the sake of "healthy work-life balance," the firm now assigns an alcohol monitor? Oh, come on. We all know that firms don't give a hoot about your health (physical, mental or spiritual). What they do care about is liability—namely, boys who get themselves into all sorts of #MeToo-type tangles because they can't control themselves.
Indeed, firms in the U.K. are getting nailed by regulators for the #MeToo offenses of their lawyers, which are often attributed to the flow of alcohol at social events.
Recently, Slaughter and May decided to pull the plug on a firm-sponsored ski trip after one of its midlevel lawyers allegedly harassed a female colleague. The Telegraph reports that "she had received a string of messages of a sexual nature," after refusing "to share a hotel room with him after a night of drinking on the subsidized ski trip."
There's also Gary Senior, the ex-Baker McKenzie partner who blamed his sexual misbehavior on alcohol. He explained his behavior to the young woman he harassed this way: "One of the reasons I'm a popular managing partner is because I enjoy drinking with others."
Then, there was Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer former partner Ryan Beckwith who allegedly hit on a female colleague following a night of heavy drinking. (Beckwith described firm celebrations in which champagne was served "as early as 10 a.m," reports LegalWeek, "followed by more champagne and wine during lunch, cocktails afterwards in the garden, then later more wine, vodka, beer and, of course, Jagerbombs.")
Alcohol-soaked ski trips, morning champagne and Jagerbombs (whatever they are): Who knew practicing law in the U.K. could be such a blast?
Sadly, though, the Brits seem intent to stop the fun. U.K.'s Law Society's Junior Lawyers Division "issued fresh guidance on creating a healthy alcohol culture in the legal profession," reports Legal Cheek. Worse, the group is implementing "Dry January 2020," which means it's not serving alcohol at all at its events.
No alcohol at an event full of lawyers? How inhumane is that? I mean, have you tried to endure a gathering of lawyers stone sober?
Besides, why do those of us who are not harassers or louts have to suffer just because some guys can't keep it together? Women shouldn't lose their right to get sloshed.
Even more ridiculous are the "alcohol-free networking alternatives" that the Junior Lawyers Division proposes, like paint-balling, hat-making and mini-golf.
Seriously? I know toddler parties that are spicier.
Contact Vivia Chen at [email protected]. On Twitter: @lawcareerist.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Innovation Over Regulation': Tech Litigators and Experts Share Insights on the Future of AI, Data Privacy and Cybersecurity Under Trump
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-58
- 2Sweet James Clinches $17.4M Personal Injury Jury Verdict in California's Kings County
- 3In Lame-Duck Session, US Senate Confirms Illinois Federal Judge on Bipartisan Vote
- 4Gordon Rees Opens 80th Office, ‘Collaboration Hub’ in Palo Alto
- 5The White Stripes Drop Copyright Claim Against Trump Campaign
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250