After Six Years of Pretrial Appeals, Waffle House Sex Tape Case Can Move to Discovery
Pretrial appeals are now exhausted and discovery can begin in a civil racketeering case against three attorneys who used a secret sex tape recorded by their client to try to secure millions of dollars from Waffle House chairman Joe Rogers Jr.
January 17, 2020 at 02:47 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Daily Report
After six years of appellate wrangling, a civil racketeering lawsuit against three attorneys over a secret sex tape of Waffle House chairman Joe Rogers Jr. is finally cleared to begin pretrial discovery over whether their actions on behalf of Rogers' former housekeeper constituted attempted extortion.
The Supreme Court of Georgia resolved the last of a lengthy string of pretrial appeals without comment, clearing the way for Rogers and his counsel to begin securing evidence to bolster claims that lawyers for his former housekeeper advised her in making a surreptitious recording of a sexual encounter with the executive.
In 2014, Rogers sued attorney David Cohen, the founder and principal partner of the Complex Law Group in Atlanta; John Butters, a former Cobb County assistant district attorney now in private practice; and Hylton Dupree, a partner in the Marietta firm Dupree & Kimbrough, after the trio of lawyers accused him of sexually harassing their client, Mye Brindle.
The high court on Dec. 23 let stand a 2019 ruling in the case by the Georgia Court of Appeals affirming Rogers' right to pursue racketeering, attempted extortion and invasion of privacy claims.
"I've got to give it to the plaintiffs," said Seyfarth Shaw partner William Hill, a former Fulton County Superior Court judge who filed the racketeering complaint for Rogers in 2014. "They did a very good job of tying the case up as long as possible in prediscovery, pretrial motions."
"It's highly unusual to have six or seven years of appellate litigation in any case either before or after discovery," said Marietta attorney Robert Ingram, who represented Rogers in a separate invasion of privacy suit against Brindle. That case, which included a harassment counterclaim by Brindle, settled confidentially as the civil trial opened last year.
Last year, the Court of Appeals greenlighted Rogers' claims that Brindle conspired with her attorneys to secretly record a sexual encounter of the two in 2012. The suit includes claims that Brindle worked in concert with her lawyers to produce the video and that it was key to an alleged extortion scheme to secure millions of dollars from Rogers in return for Brindle's silence.
The suit claims that a demand letter from Cohen revealing the tape's existence and intimating that any publicity associated with potential litigation could be ruinous to Rogers was an attempt to extort money from him. Brindle's lawyers eventually suggested in preliminary settlement talks that Rogers pay the former housekeeper $12 million to quietly settle, according to court papers.
Brindle made the recording after consulting with Cohen and Butters regarding a potential sexual harassment claim against Rogers, according to court papers and court testimony.
Rogers' suit also claims the secret sex tape violated the state's eavesdropping law, which makes it illegal for anyone to record "[a]ny person, through the use of any device without the consent of all persons observed, to observe, photograph, or record the activities of another which occur in any private place and out of public view."
Cohen, Butters and Brindle were acquitted of violating the law by a Fulton County jury in 2018 after they were indicted on charges based on the secret sex tape. But as the jury deliberated, Fulton County District Attorney Paul Howard unsuccessfully attempted to stop deliberations, claiming the trial judge erroneously instructed the jury on the eavesdropping law.
John Floyd, a partner at Atlanta's Bondurant, Mixson & Elmore who represents Cohen and Butters, declined to comment. Dupree's attorney, Tom Cauthorn of Marietta law firm Cauthorn Nohr & Owen, couldn't be reached for comment.
Hill said the case is significant because the defense put forth by Cohen, Butters and Dupree implicitly rests on the assumption that, "Our bar license gives us leeway to violate the law."
Ingram agreed with that assessment. "When does a lawyer cross the line from being an advocate for their client to being a willing participant in tortious conduct?" he said. "Can a lawyer get a pass because they have a bar card when they are involved with their client in committing tortious conduct?"
Hill said that, as soon as the case is formally sent back to Cobb County, Senior Superior Court Judge Martha Christian "will put everybody to work."
Christian was appointed to hear the case after Cohen moved to recuse the original presiding judge, Cobb Superior Court Judge Robert Leonard, after Leonard placed the sex tape under seal and disqualified Butters and Cohen from continuing to represent Brindle.
Leonard subsequently stepped down. The remainder of the Cobb Superior Court bench then recused from hearing the case, paving the way for Christian's appointment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom 'Confusing Labyrinth' to Speeding 'Roller Coaster': Uncertainty Reigns in Title IX as Litigators Await Second Trump Admin
6 minute readNew Class Action Points to Fears Over Privacy, Abortions and Fertility
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250