DC Attorney General Alleges Inaugural Committee Misused Nonprofit Funds to Enrich Trump Hotel
The complaint claims a member of the inaugural committee agreed to pay more than $1 million to rent event space at Trump's D.C. hotel for four days ahead of the inauguration.
January 22, 2020 at 10:56 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Trump International Hotel in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM)
D.C. attorney general Karl Racine sued President Donald Trump's inaugural committee and several Trump businesses Wednesday, alleging the committee improperly used nonprofit funds to book a ballroom at Trump's D.C. hotel during the 2017 inauguration.
In the lawsuit filed in D.C. Superior Court, Racine alleges the Presidential Inaugural Committee violated district law "when it wasted approximately $1 million of charitable funds in overpayment for the use of event space at the Trump Hotel, owned and controlled by the Trump Entities."
The complaint states that former Trump campaign official Rick Gates, a member of the inaugural committee, agreed to pay more than $1 million to rent event space at Trump's D.C. hotel for four days ahead of the inauguration.
That amount was "unreasonable and improperly served to enrich the Trump Entities and its owners for a number of different reasons," according to the filing.
The complaint also alleges that other staff on the inaugural committee "with experience in managing events raised serious concerns about the price" after the Trump Hotel sent its proposal.
The document includes an email that Gates sent to Ivanka Trump, raising concerns about the price.
"First, the cost itself seems quite high compared to other property. Second, I am a bit worried about the optics of PIC paying Trump Hotel a high fee and the media making a big story out of it," Gates wrote, according to the complaint. "Let me know if you have any thoughts and if we can discuss the best path forward."
The complaint also alleges that "the Trump Entities came into possession or control of nonprofit funds that in equity, and good conscience, it should not have received."
Racine is requesting that a D.C. Superior Court judge order the creation of a trust over the $1 million paid by the inaugural committee to the Trump properties, and "[d]irect those funds be restored to a proper public purpose by directing the funds to another nonprofit entity dedicated to promoting civic engagement of the citizens of the United States of America."
In a statement, a spokesperson for Trump Hotels slammed Racine's allegations as "false, intentionally misleading and riddled with inaccuracies."
"The rates charged by the hotel were completely in line with what anyone else would have been charged for an unprecedented event of this enormous magnitude and were reflective of the fact that hotel had just recently opened, possessed superior facilities and was centrally located on Pennsylvania Avenue," the spokesperson said.
A spokesperson for the inaugural committee also said in a statement that the "facts will show that the PIC operated in compliance with the law and this suit is without merit."
This is not the D.C. attorney general's first lawsuit targeting the president's private business. Racine and Maryland Attorney General Brian Frosh sued Trump in 2017 for allegedly violating the Constitution's emoluments clause by profiting from his D.C. hotel while in office. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit heard en banc arguments in the case in December.
Trump's two adult sons, Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump, are running the Trump Organization while their father is in office. They announced last year that they are interested in selling the lease to the D.C. hotel, as the company faces several legal challenges over Trump's holding of the property.
Read more:
It's Emoluments Week in US Appeals Courts: Meet the Lawyers Arguing
Trump Foundation Agrees to Dissolve Under Stipulation With NY AG
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Hogan Lovells, Jenner & Block Challenge Trump EOs Impacting Gender-Affirming Care Hogan Lovells, Jenner & Block Challenge Trump EOs Impacting Gender-Affirming Care](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/nationallawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/398/2024/06/The-White-House-Building-2-767x633.jpg)
Hogan Lovells, Jenner & Block Challenge Trump EOs Impacting Gender-Affirming Care
3 minute read![Trump Taps McKinsey CLO Pierre Gentin for Commerce Department GC Trump Taps McKinsey CLO Pierre Gentin for Commerce Department GC](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/6a/c0/2a90c5cb477389be51e3152e80f4/pierre-gentin-767x633-1.jpg)
Trump Taps McKinsey CLO Pierre Gentin for Commerce Department GC
![Librarian's Termination Violated First Amendment Protections, Lawsuit Claims Librarian's Termination Violated First Amendment Protections, Lawsuit Claims](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/389/2023/09/books-AdobeStock-web.jpg)
Librarian's Termination Violated First Amendment Protections, Lawsuit Claims
3 minute read!['A Shock to the System’: Some Government Attorneys Are Forced Out, While Others Weigh Job Options 'A Shock to the System’: Some Government Attorneys Are Forced Out, While Others Weigh Job Options](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/02/c8/47d457c84e2ba6f1200184b3b2e2/murphy-767x633-1.jpg)
'A Shock to the System’: Some Government Attorneys Are Forced Out, While Others Weigh Job Options
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1January Petitions Press High Court on Guns, Birth Certificate Sex Classifications
- 2'A Waste of Your Time': Practice Tips From Judges in the Oakland Federal Courthouse
- 3Judge Extends Tom Girardi's Time in Prison Medical Facility to Feb. 20
- 4Supreme Court Denies Trump's Request to Pause Pending Environmental Cases
- 5‘Blitzkrieg of Lawlessness’: Environmental Lawyers Decry EPA Spending Freeze
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250