Former Wells Fargo GC Vows to Fight New Charges in Sham-Account Scandal
Former Wells Fargo general counsel James Strother's lawyer, Walt Brown at Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, said that the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency's charges seeking a $5 million civil money penalty were "false and unfounded, and he intends to vigorously defend against them."
January 23, 2020 at 04:33 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
Lawyers for former Wells Fargo & Co. general counsel James Strother have vowed to fight new charges from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency related to the bank's fake account scandal.
The OCC announced charges Thursday against Strother and four other former executives, including former CEO John Stumpf who agreed to pay $17.5 million and to be barred from participating in the banking industry. The firm's former chief administrative officer and chief risk officer also settled with the agency, agreeing to pay a combined $3.5 million.
Strother's lawyer, Walt Brown of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, however, said in an email statement that the OCC's allegations against his client are "false and unfounded, and he intends to vigorously defend against them."
Strother's name is mentioned 113 times in the unredacted portions of the 100-page charging document filed by the OCC on Thursday. According to the OCC, Strother oversaw a legal department that was aware that over-aggressive sales goals within Wells Fargo's consumer bank were leading employees to open unauthorized accounts in customers' names.
"Respondent Strother and the law department he supervised were aware of the longstanding sales practices misconduct problem and did nothing meaningful to address it," the OCC filing says. "Instead, respondent Strother and the law department were instrumental in maintaining the Community Bank's business model that resulted in rampant criminal and legal violations." The OCC is seeking a $5 million civil monetary penalty from Strother as well as a personal cease and desist order, which could force him to take certain actions or promise to refrain from other activities in order to be involved in the banking industry going forward.
A 2017 report from the law firm Shearman & Sterling, which conducted an internal investigation of the bank's sham account scandal, found that Strother's legal department failed to grapple with the gravity of the threats facing the bank.
"The law department's focus was principally on quantifiable monetary costs—damages, fines, penalties, restitution," the Shearman report said. "Confident those costs would be relatively modest, the law department did not appreciate that sales integrity issues reflected a systemic breakdown in Wells Fargo's culture and values and an ongoing failure to correct the widespread breaches of trust in the misuse of customers' personal data and financial information."
Brown, Strother's lawyer at Orrick, said Thursday his client had dedicated more than 30 years to the bank. "He steered Wells Fargo through historic and unprecedented legal and regulatory issues, earning the trust of all those around him," Brown said. "At all times, Mr. Strother acted with the utmost integrity and transparency, including with the bank's board, senior management, and its regulators."
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigation Involving Failed Banks: What Litigators and In-House Counsel Should Be Thinking About
5 minute readCoinbase CLO Paul Grewal Blasts SEC for 'Enforcement-First' Crypto Crackdown
Los Angeles Lakers Ex-General Counsel Jim Perzik Dies From COVID Complications
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250