Higher Law: A Colorado Cannabis Trade Secrets Fight | Marijuana Company Promoters Face SEC Charges | A Data Breach Exposes Marijuana Customers' Data
Welcome to Higher Law, our briefing on all things cannabis. We're taking a peek at a new trade-secrets case in Colorado, and the SEC has a new marijuana-related enforcement action. Scroll down for Who Got the Work, and much more.
January 23, 2020 at 04:00 PM
7 minute read
Welcome back to Higher Law, our weekly briefing on all things cannabis. I'm Cheryl Miller, reporting for Law.com from Sacramento. Don't worry. Adam Schiff and Pat Cipolline will still be on TV when you're done reading this.
• A messy cannabis trade secrets dispute in Colorado • The SEC's case against marijuana company promoters • The cannabis attorney representing Lev Parnas • A medical marijuana data breach
Thanks as always for reading. Got a story idea? A tip? Send them all my way at [email protected]. Or call me at 916.448.2935. Follow me on Twitter @capitalaccounts.
A Cannabis Trade Secret Dispute Goes to Court in Colorado
A messy trade secret fight between two cannabis camps is brewing in Colorado.
In a complaint filed with the U.S. District Court for Colorado Jan. 17, Texas-based Preservation Sciences Inc. accused Wyoming company CannaHoldCo Inc. of marketing and selling a Preservation Sciences' product that can rapidly dehydrate cannabis plants.
The complaint lays out a complex series of events involving a number of acronym-laden companies. The bottom line: Preservation Sciences, represented by Michiko Brown and Emily Wasserman of Davis Graham & Stubbs in Denver, says CannaHoldCo had no authority to sign a letter of intent with Vancouver, British Columbia-based AgriCann Solutions Corp for the sale and distribution of the drying product under the market name Dryco. Agricann terminated the letter on the same day Preservation Sciences filed suit.
CannaHoldCo's "attempts to market the PSI Product as Dryco undercut PSI's claim to have a unique product and thereby damage PSI's credibility and goodwill," Brown and Wasserman wrote in the complaint. CannaHoldCo"s "actions also hamper PSI's ability to attract new investment," they continued.
Barry Gainsburg, general counsel for CannaHoldCo, declined in an email to comment on the merits of the lawsuit. He blamed a "communication breakdown" among Preservation Sciences, CannaHold and Agricann management for the dispute. CannaHoldCo does not own Preservation Sciences' intellectual property and cannot market it, he said.
Gainsburg said CannaHoldCo executives believe they can resolve the "misunderstandings through dialogue, rather than litigation."
CannaHoldCo has asked the federal court for injunctive relief, a declaration that Preservation Sciences owns all rights to the drying product and unspecified damages.
Cannabis Company Promoters Face SEC Charges
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has charged two West Coast men with seizing on the buzz surrounding state-legal cannabis to defraud investors.
Guy Griffithe of California and Robert Russell of Washington are accused of pocketing approximately $4.85 million from investors who thought they were buying stakes in a Washington-licensed cannabis company, SMRB. Those securities turned out to be "essentially worthless," the SEC said.
Griffithe spent $1.8 million of the investors' money on luxury cars, boats and a movie industry venture, according to a complaint filed Tuesday in the U.S. District Court for California's Central District. Griffithe allegedly deposited another $1.7 million into Russell's bank accounts. Investors were paid $340,000 "in phony distributions," according to the SEC.
"As alleged in our complaint, Griffithe and Russell exploited popular interest in the cannabis industry to obtain millions of dollars from investors who thought they were buying into a profitable business," SEC Associate Director Melissa Hodgman said in a prepared statement. "Instead, Griffithe and Russell deceived investors and used the money to enrich themselves."
The SEC is seeking a return of the investors' money as well as civil penalties and permanent injunctions.
Brian Newman of the Law Offices of Brian Newman represents Russell and SMRB.
"Mr. Russell denies all the allegations made against him. He has not signed any securities agreements nor solicited investors in SMRB," Newman said in a statement. "Any purported signed documents do not contain a valid/actual signature of Mr. Russell."
Griffithe had no counsel at the time the complaint was filed, according to the SEC.
Who Got the Work
• Greenberg Traurig partner Rick Shackelford has entered an appearance for CbdMD, Inc. in lawsuit alleging fraudulent conduct by the North Carolina-based company. The action was filed Dec. 3 in the U.S. District Court for California's Central District by Greg Coleman Law PC, Kohn Swift & Graf PC, and Barbat Mansour & Suciu PLLC on behalf of plaintiff Cynthia Davis.
• Meet Joseph Bondy, the New York attorney who mixes cannabis law, criminal law and politics. You've may have seen him on TV recently standing next to one of his clients, Lev Parnas, the associate of Rudy Giuliani who has accused the president and attorney general of being involved with efforts to get Ukraine to investigate the son of Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden. My colleague Tom McParland has some fast facts about the "variegated and colorful" attorney here.
• Husch Blackwell secured a temporary restraining order from a Missouri state court that will allow its client, the Healing Center of Kansas City, to continue pursuing a license to operate medical marijuana facilities. The firm is challenging a city of Independence's ordinance that bars marijuana businesses from locating within 500 feet of a residentially zoned location. Husch Blackwell attorneys, led by Jefferson City-based partner Lowell Pearson, argue that the law would effectively cover 88 percent of the city's commercial zones.
In the Weeds…
>> Report: Medical marijuana users' personal data were exposed in a major breach. Internet privacy researchers at vpnMentor discovered the data breach in cannabis point-of-sales system THSuite in December. The researchers found 85,000 unencrypted files that revealed information ranging from names and birthdates to the amount of marijuana purchased by customers at at least three dispensaries. [Mashable] [Cleveland.com]
>> Cannabis companies are not immune from investor suits. According to NERA Economic Consulting's annual report, "Recent Trends in Securities Class Action Litigation: 2019 Full-Year Review," released on Tuesday, six lawsuits alleged securities fraud against cannabis companies, including Aurora Cannabis Inc. and CannTrust Holdings Inc. There was only one in 2018. [Law.com]
>> Major Canadian pot companies facing proposed class-action lawsuits in the U.S. "Some of Canada's biggest cannabis producers are facing proposed class-action lawsuits in the United States after investors were hit with steep financial losses in the stock market. At least nine U.S. law firms are pursuing cases against Canopy Growth, Aurora Cannabis and Hexo Corp. in American courts." [CBC]
>> Are trade secret claims hiding vital public information? Greenleaf Apothecaries sought a restraining order last year to stop the Ohio Board of Pharmacy from releasing information on an investigation into the company's ownership. Three Ohio medical marijuana companies, marked their license applications "trade secrets" to prevent their disclosure. [The Columbus Dispatch]
>> Connecticut will join the 2020 recreational race. Senate Democrats are expected to outline their proposal to regulate and tax recreational-use marijuana on Thursday. Last week, Gov. Gina Raimondo unveiled her plan for a network of state-controlled dispensaries. A package of legislative bills died in the statehouse last year. [Hartford Courant] Politico also has a round-up of other states considering marijuana measures in 2020. [Politico]
All the Calendar Things
Jan. 24 - Adam Bierman, CEO of MedMen, will answer questions about his company and the industry in an "Ask Me Anything" session at 10 a.m. PST via reddit's r/weedstocks.
Jan. 28-30 - The Texas Hemp Convention takes place in Dallas. Scheduled speakers include Conley Rose principal Charles Rogers; Reed Smith counsel Marc Hauser; and Ritter Spencer attorney Chelsie Spencer.
Jan. 29 - The public comment period ends for the U.S. Department of Agriculture's domestic hemp production program interim final rule.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNY Cannabis Marketing Rulings / Rescheduling Effects / Honigman's Work on Trademark Suit / Goodbye
9 minute readWorkplace Weed and Labor Pacts / State AGs and Hemp / Maryland Licensing Suit / Vicente Sues Recruiter
9 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250