How I Made Partner: Mintz Levin's Emily Musgrave
"The ability to balance being a parent with the demands of a challenging and high-volume legal practice is a strength to be celebrated."
January 23, 2020 at 02:42 PM
4 minute read
|
Emily Musgrave, 36, Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo
Office: Boston.
Practice area: Litigation, appellate.
Law school and year of graduation: Boston College, 2010.
How long have you been at the firm? I began my career at Mintz as a summer associate in 2009, and joined the firm as an associate in 2012.
How long were you an associate at the firm? I was an associate at Mintz for seven years before being promoted to partner.
Were you an associate at another firm before joining your present firm? Before joining Mintz, I served as a law clerk for Justice Margot Botsford of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts. I also served as a law clerk for Judge Leo T. Sorokin, then a magistrate judge, of the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts.
What year did you make partner at your current firm? May 2019.
What's the biggest surprise you experienced in becoming partner? I had hoped that the camaraderie I found at Mintz as an associate would carry through to the partners, and it absolutely did. My partners at Mintz reached out the day I became a partner and have not stopped. They have supported my business development efforts, included me in theirs, offered advice whenever I need it, and helped me to find my footing as I approach this new challenge.
What do you think was the deciding point for the firm in making you partner? I think a firm's decision to make someone a partner is the culmination of years that must be filled with: (1) demonstrated leadership and a willingness to take responsibility for your work and for that of others on the team; (2) diligence in terms of ensuring excellent work product every single time; (3) perseverance in the face of challenges; (4) working cooperatively and respectfully with colleagues in the firm and other attorneys in the community; and (5) having a specialty and the ability to bring in business because of that specialty.
Describe how you feel now about your career now that you've made partner. There has been little more important to my career than the mentors I have been lucky enough to have—especially women. More than a decade ago, as a law student interviewing for a summer associate position, I was drawn to Mintz by my interactions with exceptional women partners, many of whom have served as my mentors over the course of my career at Mintz. This distinguished Mintz in my mind 11 years ago, and I try daily to pay this forward.
In addition to being a full-time partner, mentor and teacher at Mintz, I am also a full-time mother to my two young children (ages 4 and almost 2). Having children has fundamentally changed the way I view my career and my role as a mentor to other women. I made partner about eight months after returning from my second maternity leave, and I am deeply grateful to the women at Mintz and in the legal community more generally who have guided and supported me.
What's been the biggest change, day-to-day, in your routine since becoming partner? The number of meetings, emails and phone calls! It used to be easier for me to set aside a large chunk of my day for sustained legal research or writing, and now it's harder to find that time during the day.
Who had the greatest influence in your career that helped propel you to partner? Many of the same women I met while interviewing at Mintz in 2009 have served as my mentors over the course of my career here, including partner and chair of the firm's Pro Bono Committee Sue Finegan, and partner and chair of the firm's Women's Initiative, Meredith Leary.
|Have you joined our group ALM Young Professionals Network on LinkedIn? We're having powerful conversations that tackle the challenges we all face early in our careers. Request to join here.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow I Made Practice Group Chair: 'Be a Good Partner and Colleague,' Says Logan Drew of Robins Kaplan
How the Deal Got Done: Sidley Austin and NWSL Angel City Football Club/Iger
How I Made Partner: 'Don’t Be Scared to Be Ambitious,' Says Aya Eguchi of Morrison Foerster
How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'It's Not Just About Legal Expertise,' Says Alison O'Dwyer of Fullerton Beck
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250