Facebook Agrees to $550M Deal to Settle Biometric Suit Over 'Tag Suggestions'
Facebook chief financial officer Dave Wehner announced the proposed deal in an earnings call with financial analysts. Plaintiffs lawyer Jay Edelson, who was helping lead the lawsuits brought under the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act, confirmed the amount and said lawyers hope to present the settlement to the court "in the coming weeks."
January 29, 2020 at 07:03 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
Facebook Inc. has agreed to pay $550 million to settle claims that a feature on the social media platform runs afoul of an Illinois law regarding how companies collect and store biometric identifiers such as fingerprints and facial recognition data.
Facebook chief financial officer Dave Wehner announced the proposed deal in an earnings call with financial analysts Wednesday. Plaintiffs lawyer Jay Edelson of Edelson PC, who was helping lead the lawsuits brought under the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act, confirmed the amount and said lawyers hope to present the settlement to the court "in the coming weeks."
"Biometrics is one of the two primary battlegrounds, along with geolocation, that will define our privacy rights for the next generation," Edelson said in a statement. "We are proud of the strong team we had in place that had the resolve to fight this critically important case over the last five years. We hope and expect that other companies will follow Facebook's lead and pay significant attention to the importance of our biometric information."
News of the deal comes after the U.S. Supreme Court declined last month to take up Facebook's appeal in the case. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit last year unanimously affirmed a ruling by U.S. District Judge James Donato of the Northern District of California who certified a class in the case to pursue claims that the facial recognition feature called "Tag Suggestions" violated the Illinois law. The feature, launched in 2011, prompts users with possible matches of friends to identify in uploaded pictures. Labaton Sucharow's Michael Canty, who helped broker the deal alongside attorneys at Edelson and Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd, said the all-cash settlement sends a signal to Silicon Valley. "I think going forward it sends a clear message that, while you're going to advance the technology, you need to make sure consumers are fully informed, and in this case, opt in if they want to avail themselves of the technology."
Canty, who was a federal prosecutor in the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of New York and served in the office's National Security and Cybercrimes Section prior to joining Labaton Sucharow, said the deal was an outstanding outcome for class members. "Facebook has fought us at every stage of the litigation. It was a long, hard-fought battle, and we stayed the course."
Donato, who still must give sign-off to the proposed settlement, set a Feb. 6 hearing in the case shortly after the Supreme Court denied Facebook's bid to take the case up last month.
The plaintiffs in the suit were also represented by Robbins Geller and Labaton Sucharow. Facebook is represented by counsel from Mayer Brown and Cooley in the case.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFree Microsoft Browser Extension Is Costing Content Creators, Class Action Claims
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Mastering Litigation in New York’s Commercial Division Part V, Leave It to the Experts: Expert Discovery in the New York Commercial Division
- 2GOP-Led SEC Tightens Control Over Enforcement Investigations, Lawyers Say
- 3Transgender Care Fight Targets More Adults as Georgia, Other States Weigh Laws
- 4Roundup Special Master's Report Recommends Lead Counsel Get $0 in Common Benefit Fees
- 5Georgia Justices Urged to Revive Malpractice Suit Against Retired Barnes & Thornburg Atty
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250