Freshfields Says It Had No Deal With Recruiter Seeking Credit for Klingsberg Move
The firm said the effort to recruit Ethan Klingsberg from Cleary had been underway for "months" when Boston Executive Search Associates claimed to have made the introduction.
January 29, 2020 at 12:40 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer has fired back at a recruiter who claims credit for Ethan Klingsberg's move to the firm, arguing the firm had no written contract with him.
Boston Executive Search Associates, which calls itself ESA, claimed in a lawsuit last year that it told Freshfields' U.S. corporate leader Mitchell Presser in November 2018 that Klinsgberg was open to a move away from Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton, only to be told by Presser to "hold off."
Freshfields, in seeking to dismiss ESA's suit, said in Jan. 24 court papers that it was already working with another recruiter to move New York-based Klingsberg.
The Magic Circle firm also advanced legal arguments for why U.S. District Judge Richard Stearns of the District of Massachusetts should dismiss the case, claiming the Massachusetts Business Broker Statute of Frauds requires agreements like the one ESA claimed it had with Freshfields to be in writing.
"By way of five equally baseless claims, legal recruiting firm ESA demands a multi-million dollar payday, based on an 'agreement' with Freshfields that did not exist, for a purported lateral partner 'introduction' that it never made," said the firm, represented by its own lawyers and others from Goodwin Procter.
The move by Klinsgberg and three other Cleary partners, which reportedly included a five-year, $10 million annual pay guarantee for rainmaker Klingsberg, was a big one for Freshfields. The Magic Circle firm's corporate practice hasn't cracked the top of the league tables for U.S. deals, but its hires from Cleary—including partners Klingsberg, Pamela Marcogliese, Paul Tiger and Meredith Kotler—added star talent who had worked with clients such as Starbucks and BASF.
Mark Rosen of Mark Bruce International has been credited with brokering the move.
Freshfields doesn't name Rosen or his firm in its dismissal motion papers, but it does say it was introduced to Klingsberg by "a different recruiting firm—[one] that, unlike ESA, Freshfields had engaged."
The effort to recruit Klingsberg had been underway for "months" when ESA claimed to have made the introduction, Freshfields said. The firm said it shared Klingsberg's name and its desire to recruit him with the other recruiter in August 2018.
In any case, Freshfields argued, Massachusetts law requires a written contract for placements like the one ESA claims it made. The parties exchanged drafts, but no deal was made, the firm said.
Boston Executive Search Associates has previously litigated against Simpson Thacher & Bartlett over a fee it claimed to be owed for the placement of a partner. That matter settled in 2018.
Douglas Salvesen, a lawyer at Yurko, Salvesen & Remz who represents ESA, declined to comment except to say that he had seen Freshfields' motion and was writing an opposition. Representatives for Freshfields didn't immediately respond to comment requests. Freshfields is represented by partner Timothy Harkness and associate Brayden Koslowsky and Goodwin partner Joseph Savage Jr. and associate Courtney Orazio.
|Read More:
Recruiter Sues Freshfields, Claiming Credit for Cleary Rainmaker's Move
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSo You Want to Be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
Jones Day Client Seeks Indemnification for $7.2M Privacy Settlement, Plus Defense Costs
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250