Prosecutors Say Avenatti 'Sold Out' Client in Shakedown of Nike in Opening Statement
Defense attorney Howard Srebnick described Avenatti as a "tenacious" and "sometimes outrageous" lawyer whose outsize public persona made him the perfect advocate to take on the sports apparel giant.
January 29, 2020 at 06:26 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
Michael Avenatti. Photo: David Handschuh/ALM
A federal prosecutor told jurors in Michael Avenatti's extortion case Wednesday that the embattled celebrity lawyer had "sold out" his own client when he demanded that Nike Inc. pay him millions of dollars to keep quiet about allegedly illicit payments the company made to the families of college basketball recruits.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Robert Sobelman said in his opening statement that Avenatti, known for his representation of adult film star Stormy Daniels in her lawsuit against President Donald Trump, had used claims by youth basketball coach Gary Franklin to "line his own pockets," rather than secure justice for his client.
The prosecutor said Avenatti used his large social media following and nearly ubiquitous media presence as a "modern weapon" to force Nike to pay him as much as $25 million to head an internal investigation of Nike's recruiting practices. The government has alleged that Avenatti did not tell Franklin about earlier offers from the company to settle Franklin's claims without paying Avenatti and fellow attorney Mark Geragos to spearhead the probe.
"When the defendant looked at the coach, he didn't see a client to help. He saw dollar signs," Sobelman told a jury of six men and six women Wednesday afternoon in Manhattan courtroom.
"The defendant had not just crossed the line, he had leaped over it with a running start," he said.
The statements came as attorneys on both sides laid out their arguments at the beginning of an anticipated two-and-a-half-week trial in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Avenatti has pleaded not guilty to charges of extortion and honest services fraud stemming from his dealings last March with Nike and its attorneys, which were recorded by federal law enforcement agents.
Defense attorney Howard Srebnick on Wednesday described Avenatti as a "tenacious" and "sometimes outrageous" lawyer whose outsize public persona made him the perfect advocate to take on the sports apparel giant.
Avenatti's negotiations, he said, were "not extortion," but rather zealous advocacy on behalf of Franklin, who had said he felt "strong-armed" by Nike, when the company pulled its $72,000 sponsorship of his California basketball league.
According to Srebnick, Franklin and an adviser came to Avenatti for restitution and to expose widespread corruption at the firm.
"It's not extortion because you use harsh language in the course of negotiations for your client," Srebnick said.
Nike has not been charged in connection with any alleged recruiting violations, and has denied wrongdoing.
Sobelman cautioned the jury that "Nike was not on trial," and said the prosecution would present evidence of Avenatti's debts at the time to show the case was all about money.
"This trial is about how Franklin was victimized by the defendant, his own lawyer," Sobelman said, adding that Avenatti had "used Franklin to make millions for himself."
Avenatti's lawyers, however, have made it clear that they intend to put Nike under a microscope and potentially call employees at the firm to testify at trial. Srebnick said Avenatti was trying to achieve dual goals of securing a settlement for Franklin, as well as preventing a "whitewashing" of his client's claims.
"That's not extortion. That's not fraud," Srebnick said. "That's litigation. That's exactly what it was."
"This courtroom," he told the jury, "will be a fight for credibility. It will be a search for the truth by you."
Avenatti, meanwhile, will wait out the trial from a jail cell in the special housing unit of the Metropolitan Correctional Center, after a federal judge in California revoked his bail in California, where he was accused in a sprawling indictment of defrauding his former clients.
He also faces a planned trial in New York on charges that he skimmed money from a book deal that was being paid to Daniels, whose real name is Stephanie Clifford.
Avenatti has denied all charges, claiming that his outspoken stances against Trump had made him a target of the president and his Justice Department.
Prosecutors had asked U.S. District Judge Paul Gardephe to keep any references to Trump and Daniels out of the extortion trial, but the judge denied the request as impractical, given Avenatti's notoriety in the press.
Gardephe did, however, allow the prosecutors to tell the jury about some $11 million in debt Avenatti had at the time he first contacted Nike last March.
Read More:
Jury to Hear About Michael Avenatti's Debts, Stormy Daniels Case in Nike Extortion Trial
Michael Avenatti, 1 Week Before NY Trial, Is Arrested for Bail Violations in LA
Avenatti Seeks to Exclude Evidence of Personal Finances From Nike Extortion Trial
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Librarian's Termination Violated First Amendment Protections, Lawsuit Claims Librarian's Termination Violated First Amendment Protections, Lawsuit Claims](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/389/2023/09/books-AdobeStock-web.jpg)
Librarian's Termination Violated First Amendment Protections, Lawsuit Claims
3 minute read![GOP Now Holds FTC Gavel, but Dems Signal They'll Be a Rowdy Minority GOP Now Holds FTC Gavel, but Dems Signal They'll Be a Rowdy Minority](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/4e/5a/5ad53ca64ad18684ad71233d78fb/alvaro-bedoya-767x633.jpg)
GOP Now Holds FTC Gavel, but Dems Signal They'll Be a Rowdy Minority
6 minute read![DC Lawsuits Seek to Prevent Mass Firings and Public Naming of FBI Agents DC Lawsuits Seek to Prevent Mass Firings and Public Naming of FBI Agents](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/nationallawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/389/2024/08/Federal-Bureau-Investigation-FBI-2016-05-767x633.jpg)
DC Lawsuits Seek to Prevent Mass Firings and Public Naming of FBI Agents
3 minute read![New FCC Chair Hires Section 230 Critic as General Counsel New FCC Chair Hires Section 230 Critic as General Counsel](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/b9/d8/54d7475743b5b95da8386e800eac/adam-candeub-767x633-1.jpg)
Trending Stories
- 1Mastering Litigation in New York’s Commercial Division Part V, Leave It to the Experts: Expert Discovery in the New York Commercial Division
- 2GOP-Led SEC Tightens Control Over Enforcement Investigations, Lawyers Say
- 3Transgender Care Fight Targets More Adults as Georgia, Other States Weigh Laws
- 4Roundup Special Master's Report Recommends Lead Counsel Get $0 in Common Benefit Fees
- 5Georgia Justices Urged to Revive Malpractice Suit Against Retired Barnes & Thornburg Atty
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250