Boies Schiller Lawyer Testifies Firm Helped Hire Ex-Spies to Aid Harvey Weinstein
A partner at Boies Schiller Flexner testified Thursday that the firm signed a contract with Black Cube, a private investigations firm with links to Israeli intelligence, on behalf of former Hollywood producer and former Boies Schiller client Harvey Weinstein.
January 30, 2020 at 03:46 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
A partner at Boies Schiller Flexner testified Thursday that the firm signed a contract with Black Cube, a private investigations firm with links to Israeli intelligence, on behalf of former Hollywood producer and former Boies Schiller client Harvey Weinstein.
Attorney Dev Sen, who has been with Boies Schiller for about five years and focuses on corporate law, took the witness stand during the second week of testimony in Weinstein's criminal trial in Manhattan.
Defense attorneys representing Weinstein, who has pleaded not guilty to predatory sexual assault, rape and criminal sex act, objected to Sen's testimony on the grounds that Weinstein is entitled to attorney-client privilege in his communications with Boies Schiller attorneys.
Judge James Burke decided prosecutors could not question Sen in detail about the contents of the Black Cube contract, including a "success fee" clause that assistant district attorney Joan Illuzzi-Orbon said Weinstein promised to Black Cube if the firm was able to prevent publication of stories about Weinstein's behavior toward women.
Sen said Boies Schiller did sign a Black Cube contract on Weinstein's behalf in July 2017, which is several months before The New York Times and the New Yorker magazine each published major investigations into Weinstein's history of alleged sexual misconduct.
After Sen testified, jurors were allowed to see a brief email from Weinstein's personal email address to someone with a Black Cube email address.
"Red flags r the ones of interest," the email from Weinstein said. A second page showed what appeared to be a list of names, all redacted except for the name Annabella Sciorra in red text.
Sciorra has testified that Weinstein sexually assaulted her at her apartment near Gramercy Park in the early 1990s, and prosecutors hope her account will help them prove a pattern of misconduct for Weinstein's predatory sexual assault charge.
During her testimony, Sciorra said that around the time she became aware that reporters were working on the 2017 investigations, she was contacted by someone claiming to be a journalist but believed that the person was actually employed by Weinstein.
The New York Times has reported that Black Cube agreed to use someone posing as an investigative journalist as part of the firm's work for Weinstein.
Another of Weinstein's alleged victims is expected to testify Friday, prosecutors said.
Lawyers for both sides continued to disagree over minor matters Thursday. Defense attorney Damon Cheronis told Burke that Illuzzi-Orbon was talking too loudly during his cross-examinations and that jurors, seated a few feet away from the prosecutors' table, might be able to hear her.
Illuzzi-Orbon replied that she'd been relying on note-passing to keep quiet and objected, as she had on previous days, to how loudly Weinstein spoke with his lawyers at his table.
Burke dismissed Cheronis' complaint, agreeing that Illuzzi-Orbon seemed to be communicating with her colleagues by quietly passing notes.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'New Circumstances': Winston & Strawn Seek Expedited Relief in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
3 minute read'It Refreshes Me': King & Spalding Privacy Leader Doubles as Equestrian Champ
5 minute readFederal Judge Rejects Teams' Challenge to NASCAR's 'Anticompetitive Terms' in Agreement
As Uncertainty Hovers Over PGA Merger, LIV Golf Hires Entertainment Industry Veteran as Legal Chief
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250