Oct. Trial Set for Ex-Giuliani Associates Parnas and Fruman in Campaign-Finance Case
Asked whether he would assist the government's investigation, Lev Parnas said it was a "good question."
February 03, 2020 at 05:03 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
A Manhattan federal judge on Monday set an Oct. 5 trial date in the case of Lev Parnas and another former associate of Rudy Giuliani charged with trying to illegally funnel foreign money into U.S. elections.
U.S. District Judge J. Paul Oetken of the Southern District of New York blocked out three weeks for trial in the criminal campaign-finance case, which has loomed over the Senate impeachment trial of President Donald Trump.
Parnas and Igor Fruman, two foreign-born businessmen with ties to Giuliani, are accused along with two other men in a scheme prop up candidates for state and federal office in order to buy political influence in the U.S. All four defendants have pleaded not guilty and are currently free on bond.
Giuliani, a personal attorney to the president, is reported to be under investigation in the Southern District, though he has not been charged with any crimes.
Unlike his co-defendants, Parnas has mounted a public campaign to discuss his role in an alleged effort by members of the Trump administration to withhold aid to Ukraine in exchange for an announcement on investigations into Trump's political rival Joe Biden and his son Hunter, who sat on the board of the Ukrainian gas company Burisma.
Parnas' attorney, Joseph Bondy, told the New York Law Journal last month that his client had hoped to be called as a witness in the Senate impeachment trial, partly, to mitigate any sentence he may receive in the Southern District. Last week, Bondy and Parnas traveled to Washington, D.C., to help bolster their case for testimony, but the Senate Republicans on Friday voted against calling witnesses ahead of an expected acquittal vote later this week.
Bondy alluded to the latest impeachment developments while addressing reporters and said he and his client would be ready to try the case in the fall.
"If we were to have a trial with no evidence and no witnesses and a jury of our friends, it would go a lot faster, but we're going to have a fair trial," Bondy said. "We're very much looking forward to having our days in court."
Prosecutors, meanwhile, updated Oetken on what they have described as "voluminous" discovery, which included more than 197,000 stamped documents, as well as approximately three terabytes worth of materials extracted from the defendants' phones, tablets and computers.
Assistant U.S. attorney Nicolas Roos also said the FBI is still trying to "crack" about 20 devices for which the defense has not provided passwords. The "vast majority" of discovery would be completed by mid-March, he said.
The Manhattan U.S. Attorney's Office has left open the possibility of a superseding indictment in the case, but attorneys Monday declined to provide an update on their thinking. Roos said the office was still evaluating any decision and had discussed applicable deadlines with defense counsel.
"The government's aware of when it's appropriate to bring a superseder, based on those dates," he said.
Parnas has said that prosecutors have so far rebuffed his attempts to cooperate in the criminal case, and it wasn't immediately clear how the planned acquittal vote would impact his strategy moving forward.
Bondy did not immediately return a call requesting comment.
Asked Monday whether he would assist the government's investigation, Parnas said it was a "good question."
"I'm here to tell the truth," said Parnas, donning an American flag pin outside of the Lower Manhattan courthouse.
"We've been, the last month, as strong as possible, been able to help Senate and Congress and the world recognize the truth and what happened, and what is happening is and what's going on," he said. "I want to thank all the well wishers out there, all the supporters out there, it really keeps me going, and gives me strength to keep fighting against this powerful enemy but I think we will prevail."
Read More:
Giuliani-Linked Defendant Parnas to Remain Free on Bail as Judge Rejects Prosecutors' Bid to Revoke
Lawyer for Giuliani-Linked Defendant Cites Executive Privilege Issue in Campaign Finance Case
Federal Prosecutors Charge 2 Men With Giuliani Ties in Campaign-Finance Violation Probe
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readAttorney Sanctioned $9K for Revealing Nude Photos, Other Info in Court Filing
4 minute readChicago Cubs' IP Claim to Continue Against Wrigley View Rooftop, Judge Rules
2 minute readAfter Solving Problems for Presidents, Ron Klain Now Applying Legal Prowess to Helping Airbnb Overturn NYC Ban
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Texas Supreme Court Grapples Over Fifth Circuit Question on State Usury Law
- 2Exploring the Opportunities and Risks for Generative AI and Corporate Databases: An Introduction
- 3Farella Elevates First Female Firmwide Managing Partners
- 4Family Court 2024 Roundup: Part I
- 5In-House Lawyers Are Focused on Employment and Cybersecurity Disputes, But Looking Out for Conflict Over AI
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250