Across States and Boardrooms, the CCPA Is Changing the Privacy Paradigm
A Legalweek panel discussed how the California Consumer Privacy Act could spread beyond California's borders with or without other states moving on their own legislation.
February 07, 2020 at 10:18 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Legal Tech News
Lawyers say after the California Consumer Privacy Act went into effect on Jan. 1, a new privacy-first approach in the U.S. was born. "The whole argument was you can't have a privacy law on the state level," said Husch Blackwell partner David Stauss. "That argument is gone."
Indeed, Stauss and other Legalweek panelists on at the "Understanding CCPA & U.S. State Privacy Regimes" session at Legalweek 2020 in New York discussed how the CCPA could lead to a patchwork of varying privacy laws in the U.S. Plus, even if some states don't enact privacy laws, the CCPA could still fuel corporations to enact similar privacy protocols for all U.S. citizens, the panel said.
In the wake of the CCPA, some large tech and social media companies have announced their desire for a federal data privacy law. Specifically, those companies want a federal data privacy law that preempts state law and doesn't include a private action penalty, Stauss noted.
For the time being, many companies that fall under the CCPA's scope, like Microsoft, may decide to extend CCPA-similar privacy rights to non-Californians to improve security protocols and branding.
"Optically it looks bad if you are only giving privacy rights to a subset of people," noted panelist and Venable partner Shannon Yavorsky.
Suffice to say, the adoption of widespread data privacy practices is greatly motivated by governmental regulation, and lawyers say it's more likely additional states will enact a data privacy law before the federal government. Noting all states' data breach notification laws; Illinois', Washington state's and Texas' biometric laws; the CCPA; and New York State Department of Financial Services' cybersecurity requirement, Stauss said states are taking the initiative in regulating data privacy.
"There is a power to be addressed. If the federal government continues to do nothing, the states will act on this."
The panel highlighted over eight states that have introduced data privacy legislation recently. The states' proposed laws vary, from Washington state's General Data Protection Regulation-lite approach to other states' moves to mirror the CCPA and those with proposals are a GDPR and CCPA mix.
Though the bills vary, they all share a common theme, the panel said. Notably, all the proposed laws provide residents with a "right to opt-out of sales," with the definition of sale differing per proposed legislation, Stauss explained.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSolana Labs Co-Founder Allegedly Pocketed Ex-Wife’s ‘Millions of Dollars’ of Crypto Gains
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250