First Harvard, Now Yale. Law Students Want Paul Weiss to #DropExxon
Yale law students disrupted a Paul Weiss recruiting reception on Feb. 6, decrying the firm's representation of ExxonMobil in climate change litigation. They are working with law students at Harvard to expand their campaign to other campuses.
February 07, 2020 at 12:38 PM
4 minute read
|
Students from two of the county's most elite law schools have banded together to launch a national campaign to pressure Paul Weiss to drop ExxonMobil as a client.
A group of Harvard and Yale law students are asking counterparts at other law schools to sign a pledge that they will not interview for summer associate positions or work for Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison until the firm no longer represents the oil and gas giant. They say the firm's representation of Exxon in a series of climate change lawsuits makes it complicit in the planet's destruction.
"As future lawyers, we have a choice," the pledge reads. "Will we commit ourselves to enabling corporations to continue putting human civilization at risk of climate catastrophe? Or will we dedicate our careers to making a positive impact in our communities and helping build a more just and sustainable future?"
The #DropExxon organizers are also encouraging students at other law schools to protest the firm at its recruiting events, which typically target first-year students and are intended to encourage them to interview with the firm during the on-campus interview season at the start of their second year.
The Yale students staged the second such protest on Feb. 6, when Paul Weiss held a recruiting reception at a New Haven restaurant. About 40 law students dressed in business attire unfurled #DropExxon banners and chanted for 20 minutes while a similar number of classmates mingled with partners from the firm. A group of Harvard law students held a similar protest at a Paul Weiss reception three weeks ago.
"Some of the attorneys who were there were paying attention, but some just wanted to continue on with their conversations, which seems representative of how they are treating this whole issue—business as usual in the face of the climate crisis," said Karen Anderson, a second-year Yale law student who helped organize the protest. "It was powerful to be a part of."
In a prepared statement, Paul Weiss chairman Brad Karp stood by the firm's work for Exxon.
"We are proud of the outstanding work we do for a wide range of commercial and pro bono clients in their most challenging and high-profile matters, including our recent defense of ExxonMobil in a securities fraud case in which the court found, after trial, that plaintiff's claims were entirely without merit," Karp said. "Paul, Weiss is committed to free speech and debate, just as we are committed to the principle that we represent our clients and safeguard the rule of law zealously and to the best of our abilities."
Paul Weiss is representing Exxon in multiple cases related to climate change. In December, A New York judge dismissed the state attorney general's securities fraud case against Exxon, which alleged that the oil company mislead investors over climate-change related disclosures. A similar case is pending in Massachusetts.
The students are targeting Paul Weiss not only because of its aggressive defense of Exxon in the climate change litigation—the firm has countersued states that have brought lawsuits against it—but also because that work is in tension with the reputation the firm has worked to cultivate, Anderson said.
"They like to talk about pro bono work they do," she said. "They have said they have this unwavering commitment to the public interest. They present themselves as this positive force in the world that people can work at and feel professionally fulfilled."
By spotlighting the firm's Exxon work, the organizers of the #DropExxon campaign hope not only to cut off the firm's law student recruiting pipeline, but also prompt attorneys now at the firm to consider their complicity in climate change, Anderson said.
"Starting this conversation with first-year students has been a powerful introduction to this idea that: These law firms are making choices, these choices do matter, and there are ways to differentiate what firms have chosen to do with their legal fire power," she said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'What Is Certain Is Uncertainty': Patchwork Title IX Rules Face Expected Changes in Second Trump Administration
5 minute read'No Evidence'?: Big Law Firms Defend Academic Publishers in EDNY Antitrust Case
3 minute readLaw Firms Are Turning to Online Training Platforms as Apprenticeship Model Falters
'Substantive Deficiencies': Judge Grants Big Law Motion Dismissing Ivy League Price-Fixing Claims
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250