Wiley Strikes Back at Client That Claimed It Got Used as a 'Milk Cow for Legal Fees'
The firm's former software client racked up nearly $1 million in fees pursuing a failed lawsuit. Wiley says it's still owed $220K.
February 07, 2020 at 05:43 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Wiley Rein is fighting back against claims that it overbilled a Bethesda-based software developer in a legal battle the developer lost, accusing its former client of stiffing it on the bill.
The Washington, D.C.-based law firm has filed a counterclaim against AirFacts, an airfare auditing software developer, alleging it hasn't paid at least $221,857.08 in legal fees that the developer racked up in a lawsuit against a former employee.
Wiley Rein has until Thursday to file its motion to strike AirFacts' answer to its Dec. 20 counterclaim. The law firm contends that AirFacts' answer violated a local court rule that spells out how pleadings are structured. However, both Wiley Rein and AirFacts' lawyer have indicated that motion filing might not come.
"They seek a more detailed answer. Should resolve itself," said Nicholas Hantzes, a McLean-based lawyer representing AirFacts.
Wiley Rein billed AirFacts $970,997.67 over the course of a nearly two-year legal battle against Diego de Amezaga, a former employee who allegedly broke a nonsolicitation covenant when he took a job with American Airlines, an AirFacts customer.
In a Nov. 1 lawsuit filed in D.C. Superior Court, AirFacts accused Wiley Rein of turning "this straight-forward litigation into a milk cow for legal fees, racking up just under $1,000,000 through the end of the five-day bench trial." AirFacts and Wiley Rein sued de Amezaga in May 2015 in Maryland federal court; they lost at trial in February 2017.
But the firm shot back, saying AirFacts executives knew they were pursuing a costly lawsuit whose underlying arguments weren't "straight forward," and shot down any notion of settling with de Amezaga.
Wiley Rein says AirFacts dutifully paid its legal bills until September 2017, when AirFacts retained other counsel to pursue an appeal.
"In the end, [AirFacts CEO April] Pearson's strategy was to aggressively pursue the litigation so that she could send a clear message to her employees and her clients that she enforced her employee agreements," Wiley Rein said in its counterclaim. "It was, as she stated, a matter of principle for her. Despite all of the challenging aspects of the case explicitly pointed out to her by her Wiley Rein lawyers, she chose to proceed and wanted to have her day in court."
Twenty Wiley Rein lawyers and staffers worked on AirFacts' case, which was led by Todd Bromberg, an employment and labor partner in the firm's D.C. office.
According to court records, Wiley Rein lawyers billed AirFacts more than $775,000 in fees for over 1,600 hours of work. Bromberg himself billed the software developer $392,343.10 for 585.2 hours of work. An associate, Moshe Broder, clocked in the most hours at 755.9, which came to $282,949.04 in attorney fees.
Wiley Rein is the sole defendant and counterplaintiff in the lawsuit. It's being represented by a team of attorneys from Kramon & Graham in Baltimore. Wiley Rein did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPenn State Dickinson Law Dean Named President-Elect of Association of American Law Schools
Arizona Board Gives Thumbs Up to KPMG's Bid To Deliver Legal Services
Big Law Practice Leaders Gearing Up for State AG Litigation Under Trump
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Snapshot Judgement: The Case Against Illustrated Indictments
- 2Texas Supreme Court Grapples Over Fifth Circuit Question on State Usury Law
- 3Exploring the Opportunities and Risks for Generative AI and Corporate Databases: An Introduction
- 4Farella Elevates First Female Firmwide Managing Partners
- 5Family Court 2024 Roundup: Part I
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250