More Women Are Making Partner. So What About the Men?
While women are storming the higher end of the workforce, men at the lower end are losing jobs.
February 11, 2020 at 02:26 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
|
I always get nervous whenever there seems to be too much cheery news about women. You just know that the other shoe will drop.
But hold that thought.
First, let's just bask in a moment of good news: "American women have just achieved a significant milestone: They hold more payroll jobs than men," reports The New York Times' Claire Cain Miller. In fact, women now represent 50.04% of payroll jobs, according to the Labor Department's jobs report. Moreover, large numbers of women are moving into professions dominated by men—which means that law is brimming with women.
Indeed, women in law are making noteworthy progress. Even in the stagnant world Big Law, women are making notable strides: In the last three years, women have accounted for 33% of new equity partners and 35% of new relationship partners for firms' top 30 clients, according to the National Association of Women Lawyers. While representing one-third or so of anything isn't exactly gender parity, believe me, it's a big deal in this sector, considering how long it took women to break into the 20% equity partner rate.
Recently, Law.com's Karen Sloan reported that editors-in-chief of the law review at the top 16 law schools were all women. And that means women are in place for those coveted U.S. Supreme Court clerkships. Before you know it, women will rule legal academia, government, law firms and corporations!
That was a teaser for the flipside: Men aren't doing so hot. While women are storming the higher end of the workforce, men at the lower end are losing jobs.
Yet, some of these men would rather be unemployed than take a traditional female job with growth opportunities, like health care or education. The reason: Men don't want the social stigma of working a woman's job. "That puts men at a disadvantage in today's economy—but it also ensures that the female-dominated jobs remain devalued and underpaid," reports the Times.
Though the Times article says the phenomenon is most noticeable in the blue-collar sector, I think this gendered attitude extends to all classes. (Quick survey: How many of you think male lawyers are more secure in their masculinity than male plumbers?)
And, as we know, the notion of "woman's work" is even more pronounced at home. Study after study show that when push comes to shove, male and female professionals default to traditional roles in their private lives. According to an American Bar Association and ALM Legal Intelligence survey of 1,300 lawyers at the nation's 350 largest firms, women still bear most home responsibilities. LeanIn.org and McKinsey & Co. also finds that senior female managers are seven times more likely than men to perform home duties. And the Harvard Business Review reports that female CEOs expect little support—either at work or at home—for their careers.
What all this means is that no matter how many women are leading prestigious law reviews and entering Big Law, eventually they'll face the burden of responsibilities on the home front—and that hurdle isn't going away. So while there's now progress in the female equity partner ranks, I'm not expecting a surge.
Even among the enlightened legal set, most female lawyers will tell you they have limited success at getting their husbands to do their equal share at home. As for men taking a back seat or being the stay-at-home spouse to support women's careers? Dream on. How many red-blooded guys would want a girly-girl job?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLess Is More: The Risks of Excessive Data Collection from Mobile Devices
6 minute readHow My Postpartum Depression Led to Launching My Firm’s Parental Leave Coaching Program
9 minute readProtecting Attorney-Client Privilege in the Modern Age of Communications
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250