More Women Are Making Partner. So What About the Men?
While women are storming the higher end of the workforce, men at the lower end are losing jobs.
February 11, 2020 at 02:26 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
I always get nervous whenever there seems to be too much cheery news about women. You just know that the other shoe will drop.
But hold that thought.
First, let's just bask in a moment of good news: "American women have just achieved a significant milestone: They hold more payroll jobs than men," reports The New York Times' Claire Cain Miller. In fact, women now represent 50.04% of payroll jobs, according to the Labor Department's jobs report. Moreover, large numbers of women are moving into professions dominated by men—which means that law is brimming with women.
Indeed, women in law are making noteworthy progress. Even in the stagnant world Big Law, women are making notable strides: In the last three years, women have accounted for 33% of new equity partners and 35% of new relationship partners for firms' top 30 clients, according to the National Association of Women Lawyers. While representing one-third or so of anything isn't exactly gender parity, believe me, it's a big deal in this sector, considering how long it took women to break into the 20% equity partner rate.
Recently, Law.com's Karen Sloan reported that editors-in-chief of the law review at the top 16 law schools were all women. And that means women are in place for those coveted U.S. Supreme Court clerkships. Before you know it, women will rule legal academia, government, law firms and corporations!
That was a teaser for the flipside: Men aren't doing so hot. While women are storming the higher end of the workforce, men at the lower end are losing jobs.
Yet, some of these men would rather be unemployed than take a traditional female job with growth opportunities, like health care or education. The reason: Men don't want the social stigma of working a woman's job. "That puts men at a disadvantage in today's economy—but it also ensures that the female-dominated jobs remain devalued and underpaid," reports the Times.
Though the Times article says the phenomenon is most noticeable in the blue-collar sector, I think this gendered attitude extends to all classes. (Quick survey: How many of you think male lawyers are more secure in their masculinity than male plumbers?)
And, as we know, the notion of "woman's work" is even more pronounced at home. Study after study show that when push comes to shove, male and female professionals default to traditional roles in their private lives. According to an American Bar Association and ALM Legal Intelligence survey of 1,300 lawyers at the nation's 350 largest firms, women still bear most home responsibilities. LeanIn.org and McKinsey & Co. also finds that senior female managers are seven times more likely than men to perform home duties. And the Harvard Business Review reports that female CEOs expect little support—either at work or at home—for their careers.
What all this means is that no matter how many women are leading prestigious law reviews and entering Big Law, eventually they'll face the burden of responsibilities on the home front—and that hurdle isn't going away. So while there's now progress in the female equity partner ranks, I'm not expecting a surge.
Even among the enlightened legal set, most female lawyers will tell you they have limited success at getting their husbands to do their equal share at home. As for men taking a back seat or being the stay-at-home spouse to support women's careers? Dream on. How many red-blooded guys would want a girly-girl job?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEmpowering Your Lawyers: A Marketing Team’s Guide to Achieving Goals and Fostering Lawyer Satisfaction
9 minute readChange Is Coming in the Trump Era. For Big Law, Change Is Already Here
6 minute read'If the Job Is Better, You Get Better': Chief District Judge Discusses Overcoming Negative Perceptions During Q&A
Trending Stories
- 1Rejuvenation of a Sharp Employer Non-Compete Tool: Delaware Supreme Court Reinvigorates the Employee Choice Doctrine
- 2Mastering Litigation in New York’s Commercial Division Part V, Leave It to the Experts: Expert Discovery in the New York Commercial Division
- 3GOP-Led SEC Tightens Control Over Enforcement Investigations, Lawyers Say
- 4Transgender Care Fight Targets More Adults as Georgia, Other States Weigh Laws
- 5Roundup Special Master's Report Recommends Lead Counsel Get $0 in Common Benefit Fees
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250