Reading the Tea Leaves in NHSTA's First Approval of Fully Autonomous Vehicles
While the NHTSA's approval only applied to a fleet of low-speed, small vehicles used solely for delivering goods, it does offer some insights into the regulator's thinking.
February 12, 2020 at 12:00 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Legal Tech News
Last week the autonomous vehicle industry reached a significant milestone when the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration granted robotics company Nuro three exemptions to deploy its fully autonomous car fleet in the U.S.
While the U.S. Department of Transportation's approval marks a significant regulatory shift toward embracing fully autonomous vehicles, Nuro's R2X fleet is low-speed, small and solely for delivering goods. It's still unclear, therefore, how applicable the Nuro approval will be to fully autonomous, high-speed, passenger vehicles.
"The policy concerns and security concerns NHSTA needs to grapple with is very different than what they have to face when say GM is being faced with its exemption," said vice president of ML Strategies Christian Fjeld, a former Democratic Senate staffer that lead the AV START Act through the U.S. Senate.
"The value that traditional autonomous vehicles could glean is how they are not Nuro, and likely the bar they'll have to clear is likely higher," he said.
While Nuro may not apply to all, the auto industry may finally receive guidance on fully autonomous passenger vehicles—eventually. Last year the NHSTA formally announced it was considering General Motors' application for several federal motor vehicle safety standards exemptions for its passenger vehicles.
But for now, the Nuro approval provides some insights into NHTSA's thinking and potential best practices AV automakers should adopt, said Honigman data security and privacy litigation partner and co-leader Steven Wernikoff.
Indeed, when NHTSA granted Nuro's request for exemptions, it included requirements and governmental oversight the regulator admitted are not typically required for exempted vehicles. But given public interest in the "unique and novel design" of the R2X car, the Department of Transportation determined it was warranted.
The conditions for the exemptions include requiring Nuro to provide cybersecurity incident reports and shut down operations of R2X vehicles until a cyber incident that impacts safety is resolved. Additionally, Nuro must send all incident-related information and data about R2X's operations and its automated driving system to NHSTA.
Wernikoff said the requirements are useful for obtaining approval from NHSTA, even if the autonomous vehicle isn't identical to the R2X.
"Even if it doesn't apply specifically to the design of the vehicle they're planning to put out, it's an extremely useful guidance of what the likely requirements would be for the company to release an autonomous vehicle," he said.
Likewise, such reports help regulators collect ongoing data from the AV industry to better understand the industry and develop rulemaking that is grounded in good data, said Jones Day of counsel Dean Griffith.
"One of the benefits of the exemption world is that it helps the agency to get data for down the road as it looks to regulate or put in place a set of standards for autonomous vehicles," said Griffith.
Although the exemption process is lengthy, Nuro applied for exemptions in 2018, lawyers say it's the fastest route to get fully autonomous vehicles on U.S. roads.
"That [federal rulemaking] is going to take a long time and so it seems more likely that the guidance and progress will come from these case-by-case exemptions," Wernikoff said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom 'Confusing Labyrinth' to Speeding 'Roller Coaster': Uncertainty Reigns in Title IX as Litigators Await Second Trump Admin
6 minute readNew Class Action Points to Fears Over Privacy, Abortions and Fertility
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250