Paul Weiss Targeted, This Time by NYU Law Students
A protest on Tuesday was the third in a month by students at top law schools against Paul Weiss in a bid to pressure the firm to end its representation of ExxonMobil.
February 12, 2020 at 01:30 PM
5 minute read
|
Thirty students from New York University School of Law disrupted a Paul Weiss recruiting event Tuesday evening—marking the third time in a month that aspiring lawyers from an elite law campus have targeted the firm over its representation of ExxonMobil in climate change litigation.
It's the latest sign that the law student-initiated #DropExxon campaign against Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison is spreading. Harvard law students held the first protest Jan. 15, followed by Yale students Feb. 6. Protest organizers are already circulating a national pledge in which signers vow not to interview with the firm for summer associate positions or work there until the firm drops Exxon as a client. And they say they hope to see more direct confrontations with the firm in the run-up to the summer's on-campus interview season and are in talks with students at other law schools.
"We're showing that these protests against Exxon and the company's advocates aren't just one-off events," said Anne Tewksbury, a first-year law student at NYU and an organizer of the Tuesday protest at the tony Manhattan restaurant Del Posto. "Top law students across the country are serious about holding firms that profit from climate destruction accountable for who they represent. We're sending a clear message to Paul Weiss about our values as a generation."
On Wednesday, Paul Weiss chairman Brad Karp reiterated an earlier statement defending its Exxon work.
"We are proud of the outstanding work we do for a wide range of commercial and pro bono clients in their most challenging and high-profile matters, including our recent defense of ExxonMobil in a securities fraud case in which the court found, after trial, that plaintiff's claims were entirely without merit," Karp said. "Paul Weiss is committed to free speech and debate, just as we are committed to the principle that we represent our clients and safeguard the rule of law zealously and to the best of our abilities."
Many major law firms hold recruiting receptions for first-year law students at top schools, giving partners and associates the chance to have informal conversations with prospective summer associates and encourage them to interview with the firm. NYU is fertile recruiting ground for Paul Weiss—it hired more new associates from the Manhattan school than any other law campus in the country in 2019. Harvard was third, with Columbia providing the second-most new associates to the firm last year. About a third of the NYU students in attendance of Tuesday's reception participated in the protest.
"I don't think any of us believe that, because of three protests, they're going to drop Exxon as a client," said NYU law student Emily Stewart in an interview Wednesday. "They just won a $1.6 billion case, but I do think having Harvard, Yale and now us behind it—we're a major part of their recruiting pool—will have an impact. We're having consistent actions and letting Paul Weiss know, 'We're going to hold you accountable.' You can't tell us that you're this progressive firm to recruit people, but then claim to be neutral when you're representing Exxon and treat it like it's just another client."
Paul Weiss is representing Exxon in multiple cases related to climate change. In December, a New York judge dismissed the state attorney general's $1.6 billion securities fraud case against Exxon, which alleged that the oil company misled investors over climate-change related disclosures. A similar case is pending in Massachusetts.
Stewart said the firm appeared to expect a protest at the NYU recruiting event in light of the previous disruptions at Harvard and Yale.
"One of the responses that I heard in the room when we started was, 'Oh no, not this again,'" she said. "I think they definitely saw it coming. The security was pretty tight. They had a lot of staff at the entrance."
The protesters were planning to wait until a Paul Weiss partner gave a recruitment speech to the assembled students to take action, Stewart said. But after waiting more than an hour without such a speech, they unfurled a #DropExxon banner and began to chant.
"First you heard from Harvard, then you heard from Yale; now you'll hear from us," the students chanted. "We, the students of NYU Law will not work for you while you work for Exxon. We are here tonight because this is do or die. Our future is on fire and you're fanning the flames. If you want to work with us, then drop Exxon."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'What Is Certain Is Uncertainty': Patchwork Title IX Rules Face Expected Changes in Second Trump Administration
5 minute read'No Evidence'?: Big Law Firms Defend Academic Publishers in EDNY Antitrust Case
3 minute readLaw Firms Are Turning to Online Training Platforms as Apprenticeship Model Falters
'Substantive Deficiencies': Judge Grants Big Law Motion Dismissing Ivy League Price-Fixing Claims
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250