Former Law Clerk Alleges Repeated Sexual Harassment by Late Judge Stephen Reinhardt
The claims came during testimony at a House subcommittee hearing on sexual misconduct in the federal judiciary.
February 13, 2020 at 10:07 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
A former law clerk of the late Stephen Reinhardt on Thursday alleged the former judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit repeatedly harassed her as she worked for him in 2017 and 2018.
In her written testimony at a House Judiciary subcommittee hearing on sexual misconduct in the federal judiciary, Olivia Warren said she was not there "to destroy Judge Reinhardt's legacy, to erase his significant contributions to the law, or to condemn him."
Rather, Warren testified that she was there to describe her difficulties in reporting her concerns, after the repeated harassment by the late judge.
Reinhardt, who died in 2018, sat alongside former Judge Alex Kozinski, who retired in 2017 amid allegations of sexual misconduct. Reinhardt, known as a "liberal lion" on the bench, called Kozinski's retirement "a great loss to the court."
Warren, now a staff attorney with the Center for Death Penalty Litigation, testified on Thursday that on her first day as a clerk for Reinhardt, she encountered a sine chart with "two round dots to the top of the curves such that the chart resembled a woman's breasts." She said Reinhardt had added the dots.
"In addition to emphasizing how proud he was of the nipples he had drawn on the chart and confirming that he and the clerk had made it, he asked me a question about whether or not it was 'accurate,'" the testimony reads. "Based on his tone and demeanor, I understood his question to be asking whether or not the drawing looked like my breasts."
Warren testified that Reinhardt would give her photos of female law clerk applicants and say "which candidate was more attractive and which candidate had nicer or longer legs."
And she alleged that the judge "routinely and frequently made disparaging statements about my physical appearance, my views about feminism and women's rights, and my relationship with my husband (including our sexual relationship)."
"Often, these remarks included expressing surprise that I even had a husband because I was not a woman who any man would be attracted to. In that vein, Judge Reinhardt often speculated that my husband must be a 'wimp,' or possibly gay," Warren testified. "Judge Reinhardt would use both words and gestures to suggest that my 'wimp' husband must either lack a penis, or not be able to get an erection in my presence."
A spokesperson for the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts said no one should suffer the kind of harassment Warren described in her testimony. "We are deeply concerned about the new information we have learned through Ms. Warren's statement, and we take her statement very seriously. We are committed to addressing this new information and continuing to refine our processes and procedures for protecting our employees and addressing misconduct," the spokesperson said.
Warren also testified Thursday that Reinhardt's comments reached a new level as the "Me Too" movement gained momentum in late 2017.
"He frequently discussed and always cast doubt upon credible allegations of sexual harassment. The doubts he expressed were sometimes based on his assessment of the attractiveness of the accuser, and sometimes based on his general incredulity that men could be harassing women," Warren testified. "For example, Judge Reinhardt told me that the allegations of sexual harassment that came out against people like Louis CK and Harvey Weinstein were made by women who had initially 'wanted it,' and then changed their minds."
She testified that when she tried to change Reinhardt's mind by telling him of past sexual harassment she experienced, the judge "became enraged."
"He yelled at me to stop speaking, and said that none of what I had just said was true. He explained to me that I had never been sexually harassed because no one had ever been sexually attracted to me," Warren wrote in her written testimony. "He said that to the extent that I believed I was sexually harassed, it was because men wanted to silence me and used harassment to do so—which, he added, was within their rights to free speech."
Warren further testified that when the allegations of sexual misconduct first emerged against Kozinski, Reinhardt told her "that women were not to be trusted and that he did not ever want to be alone in a room with a female law clerk again; he suggested that he would not hire any more female clerks or other female employees for these reasons."
"Judge Reinhardt also repeatedly told me that he intended to publicly confront one of the women who accused Judge Kozinski at an event at UC-Irvine, with the intention of humiliating or silencing her," Warren testified. "I later learned that when he met the woman at the event, he pointedly and publicly insulted her intellect."
Reinhardt died while Warren was still clerking for him. She described crying deeply at his memorial service.
And after his death, Warren testified that she struggled in reporting her worries about sexual harassment of law clerks to the proper authorities. She said there were not proper channels in place for her to be able to relate her concerns to the federal judiciary.
"If you feel the system is stacked against you, it's because it is," Warren told lawmakers on Thursday.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
4 minute read'Appropriate Relief'?: Google Offers Remedy Concessions in DOJ Antitrust Fight
4 minute readThese Law Firm Leaders Are Optimistic About 2025, Citing Deal Pipeline, International Business
6 minute read'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Public Notices/Calendars
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-86
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 4Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 5Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250