Kirkland Pilots Motorola Solutions to $764M IP Verdict
The company had brought trade secret and copyright claims against a Chinese-based competitor, accusing former Motorola employees of taking proprietary source code for the operation of digital mobile radios.
February 14, 2020 at 06:04 PM
2 minute read
Motorola Solutions Inc. said Friday that it has won a $764.6 million trade secrets and copyright verdict against Hytera Communications, a competitor in the field of two-way radios and repeaters.
Jurors awarded $345.8 million in compensatory damages and $418.8 million in punitive damages in the Northern District of Illinois. Chicago-based Motorola had accused four former engineers of downloading confidential documents, including proprietary source code for digital mobile radios, before joining Hytera between 2008 and 2010. Shenzhen, China-based Hytera has argued that Motorola waited too long to act on its suspicions.
"We presented clear facts and evidence of Hytera's theft and infringement and are pleased the jury found in favor of our client," Los Angeles Kirkland & Ellis partner Michael De Vries, part of Motorola Solutions' trial team, said in a written statement. "This positive outcome, in combination with the findings of other Courts in jurisdictions around the world, further validates Motorola Solutions' global litigation against Hytera."
According to Motorola, the evidence presented at trial demonstrated that Hytera stole more than 10,000 confidential documents, millions of lines of confidential source code and took steps to conceal its theft to avoid detection. Hytera has argued that Motorola acquired and analyzed a digital radio in 2012 and found "no obvious evidence of proprietary material" in it. At the very least, the Defend Trade Secrets Act's three-year statute of limitations and the Illinois Trade Secrets Act's five-year time bar should have begun running then, Hytera has argued.
Kirkland's team also included partners Adam Alper, Brandon Brown, Megan New, Leslie Schmidt, Chris Lawless and Akshay Deoras.
Hytera was represented by Steptoe & Johnson and Calfee, Halter & Griswold. A Steptoe attorney did not immediately respond to a request for comment Friday afternoon.
Motorola is separately litigating patent infringement actions against Hytera. Hytera is waging an antitrust suit against Motorola, accusing it of unfairly weakening competition.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllIn Lawsuit, Ex-Google Employee Says Company’s Layoffs Targeted Parents and Others on Leave
6 minute readPre-Internet High Court Ruling Hobbling Efforts to Keep Tech Giants from Using Below-Cost Pricing to Bury Rivals
6 minute readWill Khan Resign? FTC Chair Isn't Saying Whether She'll Stick Around After Giving Up Gavel
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250