DOJ Proposes Kirkland's Mark Filip as Live Nation-Ticketmaster Compliance Monitor
Kirkland & Ellis, the Justice Department lawyers said Tuesday in a court filing, was "well-qualified" to support Mark Filip as the monitoring trustee.
February 18, 2020 at 02:57 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Updated at 6:59 p.m.
The U.S. Justice Department on Tuesday recommended Mark Filip, a Kirkland & Ellis partner and former deputy attorney general, to monitor Live Nation Entertainment and Ticketmaster's compliance with the terms of a decade-old agreement that allowed the concert giant and ticketing service company to merge.
The recommendation comes weeks after the Justice Department, along with several state attorneys general, alleged that Live Nation violated the terms of the 2010 settlement by pressuring concert venues into using Ticketmaster. Those terms—designed to preserve competition and prevent Live Nation from unfairly steering business to the dominant ticket seller—were set to expire this year, but the companies agreed to extend the conditions through 2025.
In a court filing Tuesday in Washington, the Justice Department said it had picked Filip after consulting the two companies and the state attorneys general involved in the 2010 settlement clearing their merger. Filip's appointment was approved by U.S. District Judge Rosemary Collyer of the District of Columbia late Tuesday.
Filip served as a federal judge in Chicago from 2004 to 2008, when he stepped off the bench to become the second-ranking U.S. Justice Department official. After serving briefly as acting attorney general in the early days of the Obama administration, he joined Kirkland & Ellis, where he leads the firm's white-collar defense practice.
Filip was not immediately reached for comment Tuesday.
The Justice Department antitrust division touted Filip on Tuesday as an "experienced monitor," pointing to his 2017 appointment to oversee Pacific Gas and Electric in connection with the company's conviction on criminal charges stemming from a natural-gas pipeline explosion that killed eight people. Last year, Filip raised questions about the adequacy of PG&E's efforts to trim trees to reduce the risk of them hitting nearby power lines and sparking wildfires.
The Justice Department also heaped praise on Kirkland & Ellis, the former firm of U.S. Attorney General William Barr, Deputy Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen and assistant attorney general Brian Benczkowski, head of the criminal division.The antitrust division is led by Makan Delrahim, a former partner at Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck.
Kirkland & Ellis, the Justice Department said Tuesday, was "well-qualified" to support Filip. The firm, DOJ said, has "supported and worked with monitors and independent consultants in various capacities, including multiple monitor situations involving the Department of Justice and other regulators and institutions, including at state and international levels."
Still, the Justice Department also identified a potential snag, even as it took the position that neither Filip nor his firm has a disqualifying conflict of interest. After a review to uncover possible conflicts, the Justice Department said, Filip disclosed that Kirkland & Ellis represents Oak View Group LLC, a firm that is working with Live Nation to build stadiums in Austin, Texas, and Milan.
"Judge Filip has not participated in this representation, and he has assured the United States that he and any personnel at Kirkland & Ellis working on the monitoring trustee team would have not worked with Oak View Group LLC previously and would be walled off from any matters involving Oak View Group LLC during the monitorship and after it concludes," the Justice Department said. "As a result, the United States does not believe that Kirkland & Ellis's representation of Oak View Group LLC should disqualify Judge Filip and his firm from the monitorship."
Attached to the department's filing was a printout of Filip's biography from the Kirkland & Ellis website.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDemocratic State AGs Revel in Role as Last Line of Defense Against Trump Agenda
7 minute readBig Law Communications, Media Attorneys Brace for Changes Under Trump
4 minute readPa. Judicial Nominee Advances While Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden Picks
4 minute readTrump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250