Judge in Harvey Weinstein Trial Issues Gag Order in Wake of Defense Lawyer's Op-Ed
"I would caution you about the tentacles of your public relations juggernaut," Manhattan Criminal Court Judge James Burke said in court.
February 18, 2020 at 10:36 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
Manhattan Criminal Court Judge James Burke ordered former Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein's defense team Monday to stop talking about the case in public, after prosecutor Joan Illuzzi-Orbon raised strenuous objections about an op-ed published in Newsweek Sunday.
In the op-ed, defense lawyer Donna Rotunno seemingly implored the members of Weinstein's jury to "do what they know is right." She told Burke, however, that the article was focused on systemic issues.
"If this is the conduct that is allowed to persist in this courthouse, Judge, then we are all lost," Illuzzi-Orbon told Burke. She said the op-ed bordered on jury tampering and violated the American Bar Association's Rules of Professional Conduct.
Burke asked Rotunno to respond directly after her colleague Damon Cheronis began defending the piece, explaining that jurors have already been instructed to avoid news about the trial.
"Judge, not only is it not improper but it also … is one small piece of a large media attack on Mr. Weinstein every single day," Rotunno said.
She also said the subject of the op-ed, headlined "Jurors in My Client Harvey Weinstein's Case Must Look Past the Headlines," was "the criminal justice system as a whole."
In response, Illuzzi-Orbon leapt to her feet and read part of the op-ed from her phone, saying she didn't agree that Rotunno had written a general criminal-justice piece because it addressed jurors directly. Even if she had, Illuzzi-Orbon said, the final weekend of the Weinstein trial is "not the time" to publish it.
Burke eventually responded by ordering attorneys to stop talking to the media and public until after the verdict.
"I would caution you about the tentacles of your public relations juggernaut," he added.
The jury in the case began deliberations today and came back with questions, including ones about the verdict sheet and the layout of one of Weinstein's homes. Jurors were dismissed in late afternoon without having arrived at a verdict.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFederal Judge Rejects Teams' Challenge to NASCAR's 'Anticompetitive Terms' in Agreement
As Uncertainty Hovers Over PGA Merger, LIV Golf Hires Entertainment Industry Veteran as Legal Chief
'Possible Harm'?: Winston & Strawn Will Appeal Unfavorable Ruling in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
3 minute read'Rampant Piracy': US Record Labels File Copyright Suit Against French Distributor Believe
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250