Immigration Arrests at California Courthouse Expose Dilemma for Judges
For three years, Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye has pleaded with federal officials to stay away from state courthouses.
February 20, 2020 at 11:53 AM
4 minute read
Federal immigration agents arrested at least two allegedly undocumented men at a county courthouse in Santa Rosa on Tuesday in defiance of a state law meant to stop such detentions.
Sonoma County, California, District Attorney Jill Ravitch, Public Defender Kathleen Pozzi and County Counsel Bruce Goldstein issued a statement condemning the arrests by the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, saying "they have the effect of scaring away witnesses and victims."
While the county officials said three people were detained Tuesday, one in a courthouse hallway and two more in the parking lot, an ICE spokesman said only two men, both Mexican nationals with prior convictions and past deportations, were arrested.
For three years, Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye has pleaded with federal officials to stay away from state courthouses. The arrests this week highlight the difficulties judges and court officials face as they grapple with conflicting federal and state laws governing immigrants in California courthouses.
Gov. Gavin Newsom signed legislation last year that gives judicial officers the authority "to prohibit activities that threaten access to state courthouses and court proceedings, and to prohibit interruption of judicial administration, including protecting the privilege from civil arrest at courthouses and court proceedings."
But it's unclear what practical power, if any, judges have to stop federal agents from making arrests in courthouses.
Before the law's enactment, California Attorney General Xavier Becerra issued model policies for courts interacting with ICE that recommended limiting disclosure of litigants' immigration statuses and using pseudonyms for immigrants "where feasible."
"In those model policies, the attorney general states that the state of California 'has a responsibility to provide safe and secure access to court facilities to all residents regardless of immigration status,'" B. Tam Nomoto Schumann, president of the California Judges Association, said in an email. "Courts have relied and will continue to rely on these model policies to ensure access to justice for all in California."
Courts aren't required to adopt policies about ICE activities, however, and the judicial branch does not track whether they have done so. Sonoma County Presiding Judge Bradford DeMeo did not return a message left at the courthouse Wednesday.
Federal immigration authorities say they're not bound by California's law in any case.
"California Assembly Bill 668 cannot and will not govern the conduct of federal officers acting pursuant to duly-enacted laws passed by Congress that provide the authority to make administrative arrests of removable aliens inside the United States," David Jennings, the San Francisco field office director for ICE, said in a statement. "Our officers will not have their hands tied by sanctuary rules when enforcing immigration laws to remove criminal aliens from our communities."
The arrests follow the Trump administration's recent announcement of an escalated crackdown on so-called sanctuary cities that limit cooperation with federal authorities seeking to detain undocumented immigrants.
The U.S. Justice Department sued New Jersey and King County, Washington, this month to block such policies. President Donald Trump also deployed tactical law enforcement units to major U.S. cities to help agents there with deportation efforts, The New York Times reported.
In 2017, city leaders declared Santa Rosa, home to the Sonoma County courthouse where the arrests took place, an "indivisible city." City employees are barred from enforcing federal immigration laws.
A spokesman for Cantil-Sakauye on Wednesday referred to the chief justice's previous statements criticizing the use of courthouses "as bait" by immigration enforcement officials.
Last year, a federal prosecutor charged a Massachusetts state judge with obstruction of justice for allegedly helping an undocumented immigrant slip out a back courthouse door to evade ICE agents.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllStatute of Limitations Shrivels $5M Jury Award to Less than $1M, 8th Circuit Rules
4 minute readRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readArizona Board Gives Thumbs Up to KPMG's Bid To Deliver Legal Services
Goodwin to Launch Brussels Office With Quinn Emanuel Antitrust Partner
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250