Immigration Arrests at California Courthouse Expose Dilemma for Judges
For three years, Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye has pleaded with federal officials to stay away from state courthouses.
February 20, 2020 at 11:53 AM
4 minute read
Federal immigration agents arrested at least two allegedly undocumented men at a county courthouse in Santa Rosa on Tuesday in defiance of a state law meant to stop such detentions.
Sonoma County, California, District Attorney Jill Ravitch, Public Defender Kathleen Pozzi and County Counsel Bruce Goldstein issued a statement condemning the arrests by the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, saying "they have the effect of scaring away witnesses and victims."
While the county officials said three people were detained Tuesday, one in a courthouse hallway and two more in the parking lot, an ICE spokesman said only two men, both Mexican nationals with prior convictions and past deportations, were arrested.
For three years, Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye has pleaded with federal officials to stay away from state courthouses. The arrests this week highlight the difficulties judges and court officials face as they grapple with conflicting federal and state laws governing immigrants in California courthouses.
Gov. Gavin Newsom signed legislation last year that gives judicial officers the authority "to prohibit activities that threaten access to state courthouses and court proceedings, and to prohibit interruption of judicial administration, including protecting the privilege from civil arrest at courthouses and court proceedings."
But it's unclear what practical power, if any, judges have to stop federal agents from making arrests in courthouses.
Before the law's enactment, California Attorney General Xavier Becerra issued model policies for courts interacting with ICE that recommended limiting disclosure of litigants' immigration statuses and using pseudonyms for immigrants "where feasible."
"In those model policies, the attorney general states that the state of California 'has a responsibility to provide safe and secure access to court facilities to all residents regardless of immigration status,'" B. Tam Nomoto Schumann, president of the California Judges Association, said in an email. "Courts have relied and will continue to rely on these model policies to ensure access to justice for all in California."
Courts aren't required to adopt policies about ICE activities, however, and the judicial branch does not track whether they have done so. Sonoma County Presiding Judge Bradford DeMeo did not return a message left at the courthouse Wednesday.
Federal immigration authorities say they're not bound by California's law in any case.
"California Assembly Bill 668 cannot and will not govern the conduct of federal officers acting pursuant to duly-enacted laws passed by Congress that provide the authority to make administrative arrests of removable aliens inside the United States," David Jennings, the San Francisco field office director for ICE, said in a statement. "Our officers will not have their hands tied by sanctuary rules when enforcing immigration laws to remove criminal aliens from our communities."
The arrests follow the Trump administration's recent announcement of an escalated crackdown on so-called sanctuary cities that limit cooperation with federal authorities seeking to detain undocumented immigrants.
The U.S. Justice Department sued New Jersey and King County, Washington, this month to block such policies. President Donald Trump also deployed tactical law enforcement units to major U.S. cities to help agents there with deportation efforts, The New York Times reported.
In 2017, city leaders declared Santa Rosa, home to the Sonoma County courthouse where the arrests took place, an "indivisible city." City employees are barred from enforcing federal immigration laws.
A spokesman for Cantil-Sakauye on Wednesday referred to the chief justice's previous statements criticizing the use of courthouses "as bait" by immigration enforcement officials.
Last year, a federal prosecutor charged a Massachusetts state judge with obstruction of justice for allegedly helping an undocumented immigrant slip out a back courthouse door to evade ICE agents.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Substantive Deficiencies': Judge Grants Big Law Motion Dismissing Ivy League Price-Fixing Claims
3 minute readUS Fifth Circuit Departs From Sister Courts on Copyright Infringement Damages
4 minute readEx-Girardi Keese CFO Christopher Kamon, Shackled and Sniffing, Pleads Guilty
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250