Introducing Law.com's Legal Radar: AI-Powered, Personalized Legal News
Legal Radar offers an entirely new way to stay up to date on federal litigation, client developments and news from across the Law.com network—all in a feed that's free to use and easy to scan on the go.
February 25, 2020 at 01:30 PM
3 minute read
We are excited to announce the launch of Legal Radar, a new website from ALM that provides a continuously updated news feed personalized to a user's key interest areas.
Legal Radar combines the experience of ALM's trusted legal publications with sophisticated automation in a sleek news feed that's free to use and easy to scan on the go. AI technology allows Legal Radar updates to be generated very quickly and to cover a wide range of practice areas and industry sectors.
At launch, content on Legal Radar will focus on new federal lawsuits, litigation trends, client engagements, breaking news and the latest headlines from across the Law.com network. Future releases will offer enhanced features and new content for transactional lawyers.
What makes Legal Radar so valuable is the ability to personalize by selecting core interest areas—whether it's the emerging cannabis sector, technology clients, employment litigation, insurance work or global companies. First-time users are guided through simple steps to tailor their Radar feeds by following key industries, practice areas, law firms, companies and regions.
Legal industry blogger Jean O'Grady, a leader in law firm knowledge management, describes Legal Radar as a "clean customizable stream of breaking legal news and competitive insights."
"I found Legal Radar to be visually 'addicting' like an endless Facebook stream. It was hard to stop scrolling!" O'Grady writes on her blog, Dewey B Strategic. "Legal Radar will deliver immediate value and can be personalized for all readers. It is a brilliant approach to drawing new readers onto the ALM platform."
Legal Radar is easy to use on desktop or mobile devices. For the convenience of a mobile app, simply save Legal Radar to your device home screen.
The site's intuitive news feed format is designed to help busy legal professionals access the information they need and respond to developments as quickly as possible. Users can set alerts for news involving specific companies or law firms and instantly share updates with colleagues and clients.
Want more information about Legal Radar? Visit our FAQ page.
➤➤ Get started today at law.com/radar
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Contract Software Unicorn Ironclad Hires Former Pinterest Lawyer as GC
2 minute read
Florida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute read
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
