Number of Pro Bono Partners Has Surged Over Past 20 Years
The increase of lawyers who spend 50% or more of their time on pro bono work has been driven in part by law firms' willingness to treat pro bono work the same way they do billable work.
February 25, 2020 at 04:01 PM
3 minute read
Photo: Shutterstock.com
The number of pro bono partners in law firms around the world has risen sharply over the past two decades as firms strive to demonstrate their commitment to providing legal assistance and access to justice.
According to a new report, there were only six dedicated pro bono partners globally in 1990. As of 2019, however, some 66 pro bono partners were working in more than 55 law firms.
"A key factor increasing pressure on law firms to provide pro bono has been cuts to legal aid, resulting in increased unmet legal need," the report's authors said. The fact that law firms are picking up this shortfall and the importance that they place on this is clearly shown by the increasing numbers of pro bono partners being appointed."
The report, "The Nature and Prevalence of Pro Bono Partner Roles Globally," was published by DLA Piper in conjunction with the Australian Pro Bono Centre, the Pro Bono Institute in Washington, D.C., and the Thomson Reuters Foundation. It found that ensuring pro bono work is treated the same way as billable work, growing and strengthening the pro bono practice, and meeting the expectations of clients and other stakeholders have all been drivers behind the promotion of pro bono partners.
The report describes a dedicated pro bono partner as one who spends 50% or more of their time on pro bono work.
Most firms with pro bono partners are leading global or national firms, although one firm with just 25 partners includes a pro bono partner.
The United States has the largest number of pro bono partners, at more than 30, while the U.K. currently has 10. In Australia, 11 pro bono partners have been appointed in the past decade and the Australian firms Clayton Utz and Gilbert + Tobin each have two dedicated pro bono partners.
Among pro bono partners, 70% have no income-generating practice.
The most commonly cited responsibilities of the pro bono partner include being an advocate for pro bono; generating a pipeline of pro bono work and supervising pro bono work; thought leadership; and acting for pro bono clients.
The pro bono leaders said they also engaged with the firm's commercial clients.
Asked about the benefits of being promoted to pro bono partner, one unnamed respondent told the survey: "The title of partner has provided me with credibility and the ability to convince some of the most reluctant attorneys at the firm (i.e., the other partners) to take pro bono seriously.
"Perhaps even more than that, I think that elevating me to pro bono partner has improved the firm's status in pro bono."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Librarian's Termination Violated First Amendment Protections, Lawsuit Claims
3 minute read
SEC Sued for Failing to Reveal Records Involving Simpson Thacher Attorney
3 minute read
PayPal Faces New Round of Claims; This Time Alleging Its 'Honey' Browser Extension Cheated Consumers
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Thursday Newspaper
- 2Public Notices/Calendars
- 3Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-117
- 4Rejuvenation of a Sharp Employer Non-Compete Tool: Delaware Supreme Court Reinvigorates the Employee Choice Doctrine
- 5Mastering Litigation in New York’s Commercial Division Part V, Leave It to the Experts: Expert Discovery in the New York Commercial Division
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
