Cancellations Increase as Firms, Legal Groups Face Coronavirus Uncertainty
The American Bar Association cancelled a national event for white-collar lawyers, Baker Botts will hold its partner meeting virtually, and other organizations are reconsidering plans.
March 04, 2020 at 11:29 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
As the coronavirus spreads, law firms and legal industry organizations have continued to announce changes and cancellations of long-planned events that would have involved domestic or international travel for many.
The American Bar Association and its Criminal Justice Section on Wednesday canceled the 34th National Institute on White Collar Crime, scheduled for next week in San Diego. The organization said it made the change because of travel restrictions placed on a significant number of speakers and attendees by their employers.
The Legal Marketing Association, meanwhile, said Wednesday that it will decide by next week if its annual conference will go on as scheduled. It is currently planned for March 25 to 27 in Denver.
"We are aware that several organizations have canceled their conferences, and some firms/companies have restricted travel. We are taking all of these data points into consideration, together with the insights and guidance from medical/health experts, and local and national government officials," LMA officials wrote in an email statement.
The spurt of announcements comes in the wake of an increasing number of COVID-19 diagnoses and deaths in the U.S., and in other countries.
Law firms have continued to announce changes to planned meetings and retreats as well
Baker Botts has decided to hold its partners meeting remotely, instead of in person this weekend in Scottsdale, Arizona, as the coronavirus continues to spread in the U.S. The partners meeting was scheduled for Friday and Saturday.
"Out of an abundance of caution and in the interest of providing the safest possible environment for our people, we have decided not to gather in person at our partner conference in Scottsdale. We will hold the meeting remotely instead," a spokesman for the firm said in an email on Wednesday morning.
U.K.-based Linklaters also said Wednesday that it is canceling its in-person partner conference, which was scheduled to be held in Berlin at the end of April, and having a remote meeting instead.
Elsewhere in Europe, Simmons & Simmons has called off its annual partner conference, which was set to start on Thursday in Monaco. The two-day meeting was canceled because the number of COVID-19 cases continues to increase in Europe, according to a person with knowledge of the situation.
On Tuesday, Sidley Austin announced that it had canceled its all-partners meeting scheduled for April in Florida.
Latham & Watkins canceled its global partners meeting, which had been scheduled for this week in New York. Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe postponed its partner retreat, which would have taken place in San Antonio last week. Duane Morris canceled its Asia partners meeting, which was scheduled to take place within the next month. And Norton Rose Fulbright excluded lawyers from certain locations, including China, from its partner meeting in Austin last week.
Baker Botts' announcement shows an increased eye toward precautionary measures. The firm had announced a week ago that it would move forward with its long-scheduled partner conference in Scottsdale, but as a precautionary measure, partners in Asian offices would not attend "due to transmission concerns related to air travel." Also, the firm said that, for all personnel, travel to mainland China is prohibited, and travel to Hong Kong must be for essential business purposes and approved by management.
The firm's Asian offices are in Beijing and Hong Kong. Baker Botts, founded in Houston, had 734 lawyers and 287 partners at the end of 2019.
Read More
Sidley Austin Cancels Partners Meeting in Florida Amid Coronavirus Spread
Linklaters Cancels Partner Conference Amid Coronavirus Fallout
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Path in the Multiverse: Rethinking Client Engagement Through Gamification
6 minute readFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute read‘What’s Up With Morgan & Morgan?’ Law, Advertising and a Calculated Rise
10 minute readChicago Midsize Firm Will Combine With Miami Boutique To Form Antitrust Powerhouse
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1First California Zantac Jury Ends in Mistrial
- 2Democrats Give Up Circuit Court Picks for Trial Judges in Reported Deal with GOP
- 3Trump Taps Former Fla. Attorney General for AG
- 4Newsom Names Two Judges to Appellate Courts in San Francisco, Orange County
- 5Biden Has Few Ways to Protect His Environmental Legacy, Say Lawyers, Advocates
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250