Now Trending: Igloos for Lawyers in Menopause
Do women really want to discuss their hot flashes with their law firms and clients?
March 04, 2020 at 01:05 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
I can't decide whether this is progress or a terrible setback for women.
Anyway, from our friends across the pond, here's the latest trend: Law firms and businesses are putting the Big M—Menopause—on the corporate agenda. According to Rose Walker of Law.com International's U.K. arm Legal Week, "The U.K. legal market appears to be ahead of the U.S. market in helping lawyers deal with menopause."
So here's the news flash: Hot Flash!
Apparently, menopause is wreaking havoc on women's careers, causing "debilitating symptoms such as wildly fluctuating temperature, insomnia, short-term memory problems and anxiety," Legal Week reports. Lindsay Paterson, a former lawyer in the U.K. who now advises businesses on menopause, told Legal Week: "If you're a senior woman, nobody wants to say, 'I seem to be turning into a bit of a basket case.'"
To help women through the "change of life" and destigmatize the topic, several firms in the U.K.—including Allen & Overy (or should we say "ovary"?), White & Case, Linklaters and Hogan Lovells—are now offering webinars on coping with menopause, holding open discussions or trying to come up with policies to deal with it. Among the suggestions mentioned are giving women more flexible work arrangements, distributing desk fans to them and "offering menopausal women the chance to move away from warmer areas of the office."
So very thoughtful. But permit me to offer another idea: How about rounding up women over 50 and put them into a cooling hen pen—sort of an office igloo? Wouldn't that be more efficient?
OK, I'm being awfully flippant. But I do wonder if we aren't stigmatizing women by some of these well-intentioned measures. My concern is that we are reinforcing some dreadful stereotypes about women—that we are erratic, needy creatures driven by hormones who can't be trusted to act rationally. Not exactly what people look for in a lawyer. Just sayin'.
While menopause can create some serious symptoms, I'm wary of putting all or most women of a certain age in that category. I've spoken to scores if not hundreds of female lawyers over the years, and I can't recall any of them mentioning menopause as a career hurdle. More often than not, women gripe about men or the male power structure.
Some women in the U.K., however, believe it's important to go beyond traditional discussions about equity and be proactive about menopause. "One woman says she made a point of mentioning her hot flush and memory issues while in high-level meetings" and that it helped her bond with a (male) colleague, Legal Week reports.
Well, what can I say? Good for her, I guess.
Which leads to my other point: Where does the intersection of the personal and the professional end? If we're expected to talk openly about menopause, why not start earlier and share information about our menstrual cycles too? As everyone knows, women can get irritable (or is the word "bitchy") before their periods, so management might take that into consideration in work assignments.
Look, I'm all for de-tabooing topics dealing with our physical and mental health and bringing our "authentic" selves to the table. I also believe that it's a good idea for firms and corporations to address menopause and issue a policy on it.
That said, can't we treat it as a medical condition and allot it some modicum of privacy? I mean, do we really need to send out public notices about hot flashes?
Contact Vivia Chen at [email protected]. On Twitter: @lawcareerist.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllChange Is Coming in the Trump Era. For Big Law, Change Is Already Here
6 minute read'If the Job Is Better, You Get Better': Chief District Judge Discusses Overcoming Negative Perceptions During Q&A
The Growing Antitrust Scrutiny of DraftKings and FanDuel
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1We the People?
- 2New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 3No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 4Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 5Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250