California Judge Faces Misconduct Charges for 'Undignified, Discourteous' Comments
The California Commission on Judicial Performance is proceeding with a complaint against Judge Jeffrey Bennett. His attorneys at Klinedinst said the judge "sincerely apologized to the commission and implemented a thoughtfully developed plan for improvement and change."
March 04, 2020 at 04:08 PM
3 minute read
California state judicial disciplinarians have launched formal proceedings against a Ventura County judge accused of making demeaning and unprofessional comments to lawyers and courthouse employees.
Judge Jeffrey Bennett of the Ventura County Superior Court, elected to the bench in 2008, faces six counts of misconduct stemming from more than two dozen events between 2010 and 2018, according to a notice made public Wednesday by the California Commission on Judicial Performance. If the commission finds the charges are proven, Bennett faces discipline ranging from private admonishment to removal from office.
"You engaged in undignified, discourteous and offensive sexualized (or otherwise crude) conduct in the workplace," the commission wrote in its complaint.
In a statement, Bennett's attorneys at Klinedinst called the judge "straightforward and honest" with a "refreshing 'tell it like it is' approach to life" and sense of humor.
"Prior to the initiation of formal proceedings, Judge Bennett admitted he had made inappropriate comments," Bennett's attorneys, Heather Rosing, Dan Agle and Irean Zhang, said. "He sincerely apologized to the commission and implemented a thoughtfully developed plan for improvement and change."
"With the initiation of formal proceedings, Judge Bennett wants the public and his colleagues on the court to know that he will continue acting in the best interest of the Ventura County Superior Court and the justice system he has so honorably served for the past four decades," the attorneys wrote.
The charges portray a judge with a sharp tongue whose harsh words were often directed at prosecutors in his courtroom or in his chambers.
In a 2017 chambers conference with attorneys, Bennett complained about how poorly Attorney General Xavier Becerra's office prosecuted cases, according to commission investigators. When a deputy attorney general noted that the judge had excluded most of her evidence in a case, Benett replied, "'You can tell [the attorney general] that's what he gets for going against my president,' or words to that effect," according to the complaint.
In a 2015 case, Bennett told a deputy district attorney that his position in a criminal case was "chicken shit" and that he wouldn't tolerate the DA bringing such charges when he took over the court's master calendar department, the complaint said.
In a 2016 in-chambers settlement discussion, the commission said Bennett accused a deputy district attorney of complaining about his actions in a previous case, causing him to incur $10,000 in legal bills to defend himself in a disciplinary matter.
"You [Bennett] falsely stated that your name had been 'clear[ed]' in the 2015 commission matter, and falsely stated that you had to pay lawyers $10,000 in connection with your defense in the matter," the complaint said.
Bennett is also accused of warning an African American defendant to stop "shucking and jiving" and telling two attorneys in his chambers about his "smoking hot 10″ dental hygienist whom he would let "do whatever she wanted" to him.
A former police officer, Bennett joined the Ventura County district attorney's office in 1989, eventually rising to the role of chief deputy.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Right Amount?: Federal Judge Weighs $1.8M Attorney Fee Request with Strip Club's $15K Award
Kline & Specter and Bosworth Resolve Post-Settlement Fighting Ahead of Courtroom Showdown
6 minute read12-Partner Team 'Surprises' Atlanta Firm’s Leaders With Exit to Launch New Reed Smith Office
4 minute readMorgan Lewis Shutters Shenzhen Office Less Than Two Years After Launch
Trending Stories
- 1Florida Judge Tosses Antitrust Case Over Yacht Broker Commissions
- 2Critical Mass With Law.com’s Amanda Bronstad: LA Judge Orders Edison to Preserve Wildfire Evidence, Is Kline & Specter Fight With Thomas Bosworth Finally Over?
- 3What Businesses Need to Know About Anticipated FTC Leadership Changes
- 4Federal Court Considers Blurry Lines Between Artist's Consultant and Business Manager
- 5US Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250