'This Could Discourage Survivors': U Michigan Drops Steptoe in Misconduct Probe
The university said it feared that Steptoe & Johnson's past representation of certain defense clients, which include Jeffery Epstein and Roman Polanski, would discourage alleged victims of Dr. Robert Anderson from coming forward.
March 09, 2020 at 06:00 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Steptoe & Johnson will no longer represent the University of Michigan as the school investigates allegations against former university doctor Robert Anderson, who allegedly molested more than 100 people over several decades.
Explaining the decision, the university said the firm previously represented prominent clients accused of sexual misconduct. While the statement did not specifically name clients, it is well known that one lawyer at the firm represented both Jeffrey Epstein and director Roman Polanski, among numerous other white-collar defense clients.
In a Saturday statement issued by the university's board of regents and president Mark Schlissel, the school said: "After consulting with survivors, we have determined that this could discourage survivors hurt by Dr. Anderson from coming forward."
"As a result, we have decided to engage a different firm to complete the investigation, while working to ensure a smooth transition and continue the progress we have made," the statement added.
The university did not say who would lead the investigation going forward, but said it would announce updates in the "very near future."
Steptoe partner Chris Niewoehner had been leading the school's investigation. Before coming to the firm in 2012, Niewoehner spent 12 years as a federal prosecutor in the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Illinois and served as trial attorney in the conviction of former Illinois governor Rod Blagojevich.
Steptoe white-collar partner Reid Weingarten represented both Epstein and Polanski.
Steptoe, in a statement, said it is committed to ensuring a smooth transition.
"We appreciated the opportunity to work with the university on this critical investigation. We are proud of our work for the university, confident that it met the university's expectations and our own high standards," the firm said. "We also believe strongly that everyone involved, particularly those directly affected, should be as comfortable as possible with the investigation."
Steptoe was tasked with investigating allegations against Anderson, who died in 2008. Anderson is alleged to have sexually assaulted numerous people between 1963 and 2003 while he held roles as the health services director and then athletic department physician. A hotline set up by the school has reportedly fielded more than 100 calls related to Anderson.
The university had received criticism for retaining Steptoe. John Manly, who represented victims of Michigan State University doctor Larry Nassar, brought attention to the school's choice of counsel on Twitter last week.
"Steptoe & Johnson is the firm that the U of Michigan has hired to investigate Dr Anderson's sexual assaults. Among Steptoe's list of infamous clients are Roman Polanski & Jefferey Epstein. (not a joke) Interesting choice by the Michigan Regents," Manly wrote Friday.
The change in counsel comes just days after the first lawsuit stemming from the doctor's alleged actions was filed against the university. On March 4, attorney Mike Cox filed a complaint in federal court on behalf of an anonymous plaintiff who alleges they were molested by Anderson between 1980 and 1985. While it was retained for the internal investigation, Alston & Bird had not entered an appearance on the school's behalf in that case, nor has any other firm as of Monday afternoon.
Ben Trachtenberg, an associate professor at the University of Missouri School of Law, said that he isn't surprised by the University of Michigan's choice given the dual objectives of such an investigation.
"One goal is to actually find the truth, another is to convey to outsiders that they're trying to find the truth," said Trachtenberg, whose research looks at the legal climate surrounding universities.
While a firm representing Epstein and also leading a sex abuse probe isn't a conflict in any concrete, legal ethics sphere, such representation may turn off clients, Trachtenberg said. He likened the dynamic to insurance companies refusing to hire a plaintiffs attorney who made a career suing insurers on behalf of victims.
Those prior representations "might hurt their ability to be believed. The university is trying to have credibility with victims and stakeholders," he added.
Other Big Law firms have found a niche representing universities in similar investigations as the schools look for third parties to lend credibility to their efforts after the fact. Pepper Hamilton represented Baylor University in an investigation between 2015 and 2016, for example, and Perkins Coie billed Ohio State $6.2 million to investigate school doctor Richard Strauss.
Gina Maisto Smith and Leslie Gomez, who led Pepper's investigation at Baylor, jumped to Cozen O'Connor in 2017 along with three other attorneys and are now vice-chairs of the firm's institutional response group.
Trachtenberg said that as firms continue to develop niche practices like these, they'll have to make sure they're vigilant about avoiding even the appearance of conflict.
"If that's the niche you want to get into, you need to be above reproach from the eyes of people who aren't looking at it from the legal perspective, but from the perspective of 'Can I trust you if I don't know you?'" he said.
|Read More
Cozen O'Connor Launches Sexual Misconduct Practice With Pepper Hamilton Pros
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readEuropean, US Litigation Funding Experts Look for Commonalities at NYU Event
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250