Connecticut Law Schools Move to Online Classes Amid Coronavirus Concerns
Two of Connecticut's three law schools have announced they will now have their classes online for either a portion of the semester or for the entire semester.
March 11, 2020 at 06:40 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Connecticut Law Tribune
Two Connecticut law schools announced this week they were joining more than 25 counterparts around the United States in shifting to online classes for all or part of the remaining school year, due to fears of the coronavirus.
The list of law schools nationwide features some of the most prominent institutions, including Stanford Law School, Georgetown University Law Center, Columbia Law School and Harvard Law School.
Quinnipiac University School of Law will move its classes from on-site to online for the remainder of the semester, after classes resume post-spring break on March 18.
But as of Wednesday afternoon, the University of Connecticut School of Law said classes would continue on campus.
Meanwhile, in an online message to students and staff, Yale Law School Dean Heather Gerken wrote that spring recess would be extended an extra week until March 20, and then classes would be online until April 5. In-class study is scheduled to resume on April 6.
"I know this is a very difficult and uncertain time for all of you," Gerken said in her message. "The law school has been working around the clock to ensure the health and safety of our community, and we have been collaborating with the university and its public health experts as the situation unfolds."
A third Connecticut resident tested positive for the virus on Wednesday. In addition, two New York residents who work at different Connecticut hospitals also tested positive in the past two weeks for COVID-19, or the coronavirus. There have been no reports of any Connecticut university staff member or students contracting the virus.
All three law schools have posted on their websites information about the virus and their response to it.
W. John Thomas, a professor at Quinnipiac University School of Law, teaches three classes on campus and one—health care compliance law—online. Thomas said he's the only professor at Quinnipiac who teaches a course online.
That gives him an advantage over his peers, Thomas said Wednesday.
"For me personally, there are no obstacles or challenges, since I've been teaching a course online for five years," Thomas said. "My fellow professors, though, are a little anxious. But the administration, including the dean and associate dean, have been collecting and distributing materials to professors that will help them move to teaching online."
Professors, Thomas said, "need to familiarize themselves with the technology and learn how to teach without getting instant feedback from students. They also need to learn how to construct online discussion forums that will enable students to participate in an active manner. That will be a challenge."
At Quinnipiac, Thomas said, there are two ways of teaching students online: teach live with students taking part via Zoom or Skype or to allow students to access the class when they want. Each professor will choose the option they prefer. Thomas said he'll use the latter for his classes.
"I will let students study when they want because I think their lives are being disrupted in a stunning way now," Thomas said. "I would like to minimize that by letting them do the work when and where they want to."
Thomas said his four law classes will entail him uploading a voice-over PowerPoint lecture and an introductory video.
"They can look at the class when they want," he said. "The lecture contains a prompt and students are obligated to visit a discussion forum and to discuss the topic with classmates and the professor by week's end."
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom 'Confusing Labyrinth' to Speeding 'Roller Coaster': Uncertainty Reigns in Title IX as Litigators Await Second Trump Admin
6 minute readFederal Judge Weighs In on School's Discipline for 'Explicitly Copying AI-Generated Text' on Project
Trump’s DOE Pick Could Spell Trouble for Title IX Enforcement, Higher Ed Funding
4 minute read'What Is Certain Is Uncertainty': Patchwork Title IX Rules Face Expected Changes in Second Trump Administration
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250