Courts Move to Limit Virus Exposure, New Firm for Soccer Suit, Scrutiny Over Trump's Pardon Advisors: The Morning Minute
Here's the news you need to start your day.
March 13, 2020 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
COURT SAFETY – In response to the coronavirus outbreak, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is taking some precautions. Alaina Lancaster reports that the court is rescheduling two high-profile cases in Las Vegas, and relocating panel arguments initially scheduled for the court's Seattle courthouse to Pasadena, California. The communications administrator for the Office of the Circuit Executive also said they will allow increased use of telephones and videoconferencing during the coronavirus emergency. The move comes as the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut issued an order barring people who visited certain foreign countries and communities in New York from their courthouses. New York state courthouses, as well as the U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York also joined other federal courts in New York in moving to restrict anyone exhibiting flu-like symptoms from their premises.
RED CARD? – The U.S. Soccer Federation is bringing aboard Latham & Watkins to help respond to class action claims made by female U.S. soccer players alleging gender discrimination. David Thomas reports that the organization came under fire after its lawyers at Seyfarth Shaw argued in a federal court brief that the U.S. Women's National Team has less "skill" than the men's team. It's not known whether the federation is sticking with Seyfarth Shaw or replacing the firm entirely, but federation president Carlos Cordeiro issued a statement apologizing for the court brief and said the group is "making immediate changes."
PARDON ME – Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler filed a lawsuit on behalf of the watchdog group American Oversight alleging that an informal task force advising President Trump on presidential pardons is running afoul of the law. Jacqueline Thomsen reports that the lawsuit claims the group violated the Federal Advisory Committee Act because it did not file a charter and did not share its meetings and documents with the public. In February, President Trump granted a number of pardons, including to former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich, businessman Michael Milken and former San Francisco 49ers owner Eddie DeBartolo.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
What Can Be Learned From 'Virtual' Firms as Coronavirus Necessitates Remote Work?
ABA Loosens Reins on Online Legal Education Amid Coronavirus Spread
|
WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING
BRAZIL – Providing legal advice can certainly come with its fair share of risks. Amy Guthrie reports that the São Paulo branch of the Brazilian Bar Association forced a group of U.S-based attorneys to cancel a seminar they planned to hold in the city on U.S. law. The São Paulo branch noted that the seminar ran afoul of a rule mandating non-Brazilians providing legal advice register as foreign legal advisors, the violation of which can come with fines and even incarceration. The cancellation comes just a few months after the Brazilian Bar Association announced it will look more closely at how foreign law firms are conducting themselves in the country.
|
WHAT YOU SAID
"For me personally, there are no obstacles or challenges, since I've been teaching a course online for five years. My fellow professors, though, are a little anxious."
|— W. John Thomas, the only professor at Quinnipiac University School of Law who teaches an online course. However, that will soon change as Quinnipiac, and Yale Law School, join a growing number of their counterparts in requiring online classes due to coronavirus concerns. Thomas said some professors may find it a challenge to teach online as it doesn't allow for instant student feedback, and requires the use of online discussion forums for student participation.➤➤ Sign up here to receive the Morning Minute straight to your inbox.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom 'Confusing Labyrinth' to Speeding 'Roller Coaster': Uncertainty Reigns in Title IX as Litigators Await Second Trump Admin
6 minute readNew Class Action Points to Fears Over Privacy, Abortions and Fertility
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250