Mikal Watts Sues Princess Cruise Lines Over COVID-19 Outbreak
The lawsuit, brought on behalf of a Missouri couple who were passengers on the Grand Princess, alleges gross negligence over the cruise line's "lackadaisical approach" to ensuring the safety of its passengers of the ship, quarantined off the coast of California. The suit is the first to be filed by a firm other than Chalik & Chalik Injury Lawyers, which filed four similar cases last week.
March 16, 2020 at 02:10 PM
4 minute read
Mikal Watts has filed a lawsuit against Princess Cruise Lines Ltd. for its "lackadaisical approach" to ensuring the safety of its passengers of the ship quarantined over COVID-19 off the coast of California.
The suit is the first filed against Princess Cruise Lines by a plaintiffs firm other than Chalik & Chalik Injury Lawyers in Plantation, Florida, which brought four cases last week on behalf of other passengers on the ship, the Grand Princess, where 21 people tested positive for the coronavirus. As in those cases, the complaint filed by Watts, of Watts Guerra in San Antonio, alleges Princess Cruise Lines made an "extreme departure of what a reasonably careful cruise line would do," particularly given the quarantine of a previous voyage quarantined off the coast of Japan that led to 700 cases of coronavirus.
"The whole world is taking reasonable precautions to protect individuals from the coronavirus; Princess Cruise Lines failed to do so," Watts said in an email. "Even worse, it ignored vital information that its ships were contaminated, and thereafter subjected its customers to horrific exposure to a deadly virus." The complaint, filed Friday in the Central District of California federal court, seeks punitive damages and "past and future medical, incidental, and service expenses" on behalf of Debra and Michael Dalton, a couple from Missouri.
Watts is a prominent attorney in the personal injury bar whose recent cases including suits over Juul electronic cigarettes and Syngenta's genetically modified corn seed. Watts brought the complaint alongside another attorney at his firm, Alicia O'Neill, and two other law firms, San Diego's Singleton Law Firm and Andres Pereira Law Firm in Austin, Texas.
"Princess Cruises failed to live up to the most basic duty of providing a safe ship to Debra and Michael Dalton," the firms said in an emailed statement. "After the disastrous manner in which they handled the COVID-19 virus outbreak on the Grand Princess in Japan, Princess Cruises should have suspended all future cruises, or at the very least, made sure they had policies in place to prevent exposure and outbreaks. It did neither, and Debra and Michael are suffering the consequences."
Coronavirus has infected 168,000 people worldwide, according to the World Health Organization. More than 6,600 people have died, including 41 in the United States.
The Grand Princess just completed disembarking 3,500 passengers and crew after a weeklong quarantine near Oakland, California.
The Watts complaint mirrors allegations in last week's lawsuits, including the first brought against a cruise ship over COVID-19. The suits allege Princess Cruise Lines was negligent in its screening of passengers, particularly given its knowledge of the coronavirus on the Diamond Princess.
"It would only stand to reason, having experienced such a traumatic outbreak on board one of its vessels less than a month prior to plaintiffs' voyage on board the Grand Princess, that Princess would have learned to take all necessary precautions to keep its passengers, crew, and the general public safe," the complaint says. "Unfortunately, Princess did no such thing."
On the Grand Princess, ship personnel only asked passengers boarding the ship to "fill out a piece of paper confirming they were not sick," says the Watts complaint. They also failed to inform them that at least two passengers on an earlier voyage on the same ship had symptoms of coronavirus, even sending emails to those disembarking that ship about potential exposure to COVID-19. Another 62 passengers and crew from that ship were also on the Grand Princess.
Andres Pereira, the Austin lawyer on the complaint, said the group would file more lawsuits "both from this ship and any other cruise passengers that have been aboard cruise ships and had outbreaks."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSkadden and Steptoe, Defending Amex GBT, Blasts Biden DOJ's Antitrust Lawsuit Over Merger Proposal
4 minute readTrial Court Had No Authority to Reopen Voir Dire After Jury Impaneled in Civil Case, State Appellate Court Rules
Read the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Settlement Allows Spouses of U.S. Citizens to Reopen Removal Proceedings
- 2CFPB Resolves Flurry of Enforcement Actions in Biden's Final Week
- 3Judge Orders SoCal Edison to Preserve Evidence Relating to Los Angeles Wildfires
- 4Legal Community Luminaries Honored at New York State Bar Association’s Annual Meeting
- 5The Week in Data Jan. 21: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250