Mikal Watts Sues Princess Cruise Lines Over COVID-19 Outbreak
The lawsuit, brought on behalf of a Missouri couple who were passengers on the Grand Princess, alleges gross negligence over the cruise line's "lackadaisical approach" to ensuring the safety of its passengers of the ship, quarantined off the coast of California. The suit is the first to be filed by a firm other than Chalik & Chalik Injury Lawyers, which filed four similar cases last week.
March 16, 2020 at 02:10 PM
4 minute read
Mikal Watts has filed a lawsuit against Princess Cruise Lines Ltd. for its "lackadaisical approach" to ensuring the safety of its passengers of the ship quarantined over COVID-19 off the coast of California.
The suit is the first filed against Princess Cruise Lines by a plaintiffs firm other than Chalik & Chalik Injury Lawyers in Plantation, Florida, which brought four cases last week on behalf of other passengers on the ship, the Grand Princess, where 21 people tested positive for the coronavirus. As in those cases, the complaint filed by Watts, of Watts Guerra in San Antonio, alleges Princess Cruise Lines made an "extreme departure of what a reasonably careful cruise line would do," particularly given the quarantine of a previous voyage quarantined off the coast of Japan that led to 700 cases of coronavirus.
"The whole world is taking reasonable precautions to protect individuals from the coronavirus; Princess Cruise Lines failed to do so," Watts said in an email. "Even worse, it ignored vital information that its ships were contaminated, and thereafter subjected its customers to horrific exposure to a deadly virus." The complaint, filed Friday in the Central District of California federal court, seeks punitive damages and "past and future medical, incidental, and service expenses" on behalf of Debra and Michael Dalton, a couple from Missouri.
Watts is a prominent attorney in the personal injury bar whose recent cases including suits over Juul electronic cigarettes and Syngenta's genetically modified corn seed. Watts brought the complaint alongside another attorney at his firm, Alicia O'Neill, and two other law firms, San Diego's Singleton Law Firm and Andres Pereira Law Firm in Austin, Texas.
"Princess Cruises failed to live up to the most basic duty of providing a safe ship to Debra and Michael Dalton," the firms said in an emailed statement. "After the disastrous manner in which they handled the COVID-19 virus outbreak on the Grand Princess in Japan, Princess Cruises should have suspended all future cruises, or at the very least, made sure they had policies in place to prevent exposure and outbreaks. It did neither, and Debra and Michael are suffering the consequences."
Coronavirus has infected 168,000 people worldwide, according to the World Health Organization. More than 6,600 people have died, including 41 in the United States.
The Grand Princess just completed disembarking 3,500 passengers and crew after a weeklong quarantine near Oakland, California.
The Watts complaint mirrors allegations in last week's lawsuits, including the first brought against a cruise ship over COVID-19. The suits allege Princess Cruise Lines was negligent in its screening of passengers, particularly given its knowledge of the coronavirus on the Diamond Princess.
"It would only stand to reason, having experienced such a traumatic outbreak on board one of its vessels less than a month prior to plaintiffs' voyage on board the Grand Princess, that Princess would have learned to take all necessary precautions to keep its passengers, crew, and the general public safe," the complaint says. "Unfortunately, Princess did no such thing."
On the Grand Princess, ship personnel only asked passengers boarding the ship to "fill out a piece of paper confirming they were not sick," says the Watts complaint. They also failed to inform them that at least two passengers on an earlier voyage on the same ship had symptoms of coronavirus, even sending emails to those disembarking that ship about potential exposure to COVID-19. Another 62 passengers and crew from that ship were also on the Grand Princess.
Andres Pereira, the Austin lawyer on the complaint, said the group would file more lawsuits "both from this ship and any other cruise passengers that have been aboard cruise ships and had outbreaks."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFederal Judge Sends Novel Damages Question in Employment Dispute to State Court
5 minute readBank of America's Cash Sweep Program Attracts New Legal Fire in Class Action
3 minute readCounty Reps: Appeal Likely Following State Court's Sales Tax Ruling for Retail Marijuana
6 minute read'Don't Be Afraid to Dumb It Down': Top Fed Magistrate Judge Gives Tips on Explaining Complex Discovery Disputes
Trending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250