New to Law.com's Legal Radar: Cybersecurity Is Now Available in Your Personalized News Feed
Your free Legal Radar news feed now includes news and litigation updates on leading cyber businesses.
March 16, 2020 at 04:30 PM
2 minute read
Legal Radar, ALM's new website for immediate updates on news and federal litigation, has added cybersecurity. This new industry category allows users to follow a critical business area in their personalized news feeds.
Launched on February 25, Legal Radar is a continuously updated news feed customized to users key interest areas. New registrants are guided through simple steps to tailor their Radar feeds by following key industries, practice areas, law firms, companies and regions.
The site uses automated processes to quickly surface and summarize new federal cases. Each summary is then reviewed by an experienced editor and delivered based on users' personal selections so they can act quickly on information that's important to their practice and clients.
With the addition of a cybersecurity, Legal Radar now offers updates on companies including A10 Networks, Barracuda Networks, Cyren, Darktrace, FireEye, Juniper Networks, MobileIron, Palo Alto Networks, Sophos, Splunk, Tanium and more than 50 other leading cyberdefense firms.
Still learning about Legal Radar? Here are answers to some frequently asked questions
» Who is Legal Radar for? This tool is ideal for business litigators and all legal professionals who want to keep up with trends in client industries and follow particular companies or law firms.
» What does Legal Radar cover? Legal Radar delivers updates on new civil lawsuits, removals and attorney appearances in federal court involving more than 2,400 major companies and law firms. Your Legal Radar feed also includes summaries of breaking news and important legal developments covered by the ALM global newsroom.
» Is Legal Radar really free? Yes. There is no fee to set up or access your personal news feed on Legal Radar. This includes access to federal court updates and underlying court documents. Your access also includes the ability to read three articles per month on Law.com. Subscribing to Law.com unlocks all the content in your Legal Radar feed.
For more information about Legal Radar, visit our FAQ page. Get started today at law.com/radar
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Texas Court Invalidates SEC’s Dealer Rule, Siding with Crypto Advocates
3 minute read
Samsung Flooded With Galaxy Product Patent Lawsuits in Texas Federal Court
GC Conference Takeaways: Picking AI Vendors 'a Bit of a Crap Shoot,' Beware of Internal Investigation 'Scope Creep'
8 minute read
OpenAI, NYTimes Counsel Quarrel Over Erased OpenAI Training Data
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
