Prosecutors Drop Mueller Charges Against Russian Firm Weeks Before Trial
"It is no longer in the best interests of justice or the country's national security to continue this prosecution," federal prosecutors in Washington told the trial judge presiding over the case against Concord Management and Consulting, accused of sowing discord in the 2016 presidential election.
March 16, 2020 at 07:55 PM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Updated at 9:54 p.m.
Federal prosecutors in Washington on Monday moved to dismiss charges against a Russian company charged by the special counsel's office with participating in an alleged scheme to sow discord in the 2016 presidential election.
The company, Concord Management and Consulting, indicted in 2018 with other Russian entities, had been scheduled to stand trial in April in Washington's federal trial court. Prosecutors on Monday said they decided continuation of the case "promotes neither the interests of justice nor the nation's security," acknowledging that the company has no presence in the United States nor "exposure to meaningful punishment in the event of a conviction."
"Throughout, the government's intent has been to prosecute this matter consistent with the interests of justice. As this case has proceeded, however, it has become increasingly apparent to the government that Concord seeks to selectively enjoy the benefits of the American criminal process without subjecting itself to the concomitant obligations," prosecutors said in a filing in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
Prosecutors said Concord had "availed itself of the court's jurisdiction to obtain discovery from the United States regarding efforts to detect and deter foreign election interference," noting that some of the information had been leaked online, "apparently, to discredit the investigation." But, prosecutors said, when pressed to comply with its own obligations in the case, Concord "refused to do so."
"In short, Concord has demonstrated its intent to reap the benefits of the court's jurisdiction while positioning itself to evade any real obligations or responsibility," prosecutors added.
Of the Russian individuals and companies charged, Concord was the only one to answer to the allegations in Washington, where it hired an American defense team led by Reed Smith partner Eric Dubelier.
The Reed Smith team vigorously contested the charges, arguing prosecutors had overstepped in their case.
"The government had fundamental problems with the way this case was charged and prosecuted," Dubelier said Monday evening. "The purpose of this indictment was to make a political statement regarding the outcome of the 2016 election that was grossly overstated. In preparing for trial we had every intention to prevail given the problems with the government's allegations."
He continued: "The government's evidence was completely devoid of any information that could establish that the defendants knew what they were doing was in violation of highly complex U.S. laws a regulations. This was a make-believe crime to fit the facts."
The remarkable decision to dismiss the case came just weeks after prosecutors accused Concord of failing to comply with trial subpoenas seeking internet protocol addresses used by the company and financial records, among other documents. Prosecutors had asked for Concord to be held in contempt, but U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich of the District of Columbia declined to do so at a recent hearing.
Friedrich at the time noted a filing by Concord's owner, Yevgeny Prigozhin—a Russian oligarch commonly known as "Putin's chef"—who claimed that the company had fully complied with the trial subpoenas. Prigozhin, among the 13 Russian individuals charged with scheming to interfere in the 2016 election, said the company was unable to locate many of the requested records because it has a policy of keeping emails and other documents for no more than three months.
Prosecutors on Monday described that Prigozhin's filing as "a misleading (at best) declaration from an incredible declarant."
On Monday, the government simultaneously submitted a classified filing to Friedrich. That filing presented "other facts described in more detail" about the Justice Department's decision to drop the case against Concord.
"The government must also weigh the potential risks to the national security that are necessarily associated with a trial of this nature. A trial of this case risks publicizing sensitive law enforcement information regarding measures used to investigate and protect against foreign influence over the political system," prosecutors wrote in Monday's filing.
Prosecutors said Monday's filing:
There is a substantial federal interest in defending American democratic institutions, exposing those who endeavor to criminally interfere with them, and holding them accountable, which is why this prosecution was properly commenced in the first place. In light of the defendant's conduct, however, its ephemeral presence and immunity to just punishment, the risk of exposure of law enforcement's tools and techniques, and the post-indictment change in the proof available at trial, the balance of equities has shifted. It is no longer in the best interests of justice or the country's national security to continue this prosecution.
The United States, according to the government's filing "will continue its efforts to apprehend the individual defendants and bring them before this court to face the pending charges."
The April trial in the Concord case likely would have been postponed, as the court in Washington, like many others, has curtailed activity in the face of the coronavirus threat. At a recent hearing, prosecutor Adam Jed, who served on former Special Counsel Robert Mueller's team, questioned whether Concord was meaningfully participating in the case and floated the idea of delaying the trial.
Chief Judge Beryl Howell on Monday, pointing to the coronavirus crisis, announced all federal civil and criminal trials in Washington would be postponed at least until May 11.
Read more:
'Unwarranted Cheap Shot': Lawyers in Russia Troll Farm Case Feud Over Trial Subpoenas
Mueller's Team Questions How Files in Russia Case Ended Up Online
'Knock It Off': Judge Upbraids Reed Smith Partner Litigating Mueller Case
Tempers Flare at Russia Hearing Over Prosecutor, Defense Phone Call
How Law Firms Are Protecting Sensitive Information in Russia Cases
Reed Smith's Russia Work in Mueller Case Gets Closeup in Court
This report was updated with comment from a lawyer for Concord.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readAttorney Sanctioned $9K for Revealing Nude Photos, Other Info in Court Filing
4 minute readChicago Cubs' IP Claim to Continue Against Wrigley View Rooftop, Judge Rules
2 minute readAfter Solving Problems for Presidents, Ron Klain Now Applying Legal Prowess to Helping Airbnb Overturn NYC Ban
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Court Rejects San Francisco's Challenge to Robotaxi Licenses
- 2'Be Prepared and Practice': Paul Hastings' Michelle Reed Breaks Down Firm's First SEC Cybersecurity Incident Disclosure Report
- 3Lina Khan Gives Up the Gavel After Contentious 4 Years as FTC Chair
- 4Allstate Is Using Cell Phone Data to Raise Prices, Attorney General Claims
- 5Epiq Announces AI Discovery Assistant, Initially Developed by Laer AI, With Help From Sullivan & Cromwell
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250