Number of Securities Class Actions Against Non-US Issuers Holds Steady for Third Year
"It seems to be an area of high interest in the shareholder plaintiffs' bar in the United States, and I don't see any letup in this particular trend," David Kistenbroker, the managing partner at Dechert in Chicago and global co-leader of the white-collar and securities litigation practice, said in an interview Thursday.
March 19, 2020 at 04:39 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
Approximately 15% of the securities class action suits filed in 2019 were filed against non-U.S. issuers, marking a 2% increase from 2018, according to a recent report published by Dechert.
According to "Non-U.S. Issuers Targeted In Securities Class Actions Files in the United States," 64 of the 404 securities class action lawsuits in 2019 were filed against non-U.S. issuers. In 2018, 54 of the 403 securities class action suits filed, or 13%, were against non-U.S. issuers.
"It seems to be an area of high interest in the shareholder plaintiffs' bar in the United States and I don't see any letup in this particular trend," said David Kistenbroker, the managing partner at Dechert in Chicago and global co-leader of the white-collar and securities litigation practice.
The plaintiffs bar is particularly keen on filing securities suits against biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies based outside of the U.S., according to the report. Eighteen of the 64 suits in 2019 against non-U.S. issuers were against companies in those industries.
Six of the suits filed in 2019 alleged companies misrepresented the prospects of a new drug or product being approved by the Food and Drug Administration.
"The percentage of the companies that get a declination from the FDA is fairly substantial, and it is well known that can cause a rather significant downward movement of the publicly issued stock of those companies," Kistenbroker explained.
He said that kind of downward movement in stock is what the plaintiffs bar is looking for.
In-house counsel, Kistenbroker said, at companies in the biotech and pharmaceutical companies should focus on their internal processes and disclosures.
"They need to make sure they have a robust structure to create those disclosures and make sure their disclosures are as full as possible," Kistenbroker said.
Though not mentioned in the report, Kistenbroker said the new coronavirus will likely contribute to new class action suits against non-U.S. securities issuers throughout 2020.
"We have seen two shareholder class actions filed generally in the United States already," Kistenbroker said. "I think those are just the tip of the iceberg."
Significantly, Kistenbroker said, investors have filed a suit against Norwegian Cruise Line in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida claiming class members were hurt financially by the company allegedly telling passengers that COVID-19 would not affect their trips. Investors have also filed suit against Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania-based Inovio Pharmaceuticals Inc. and its CEO over false statements claiming the biotech firm had developed a COVID-19 vaccine in three hours.
Proper disclosures are important to mitigate the risk of a COVID-19 related securities suit.
"In today's environment, every company should make sure that it disclosures fully and accurately the impact of the coronavirus on their business and operations," Kistenbroker said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom 'Confusing Labyrinth' to Speeding 'Roller Coaster': Uncertainty Reigns in Title IX as Litigators Await Second Trump Admin
6 minute readNew Class Action Points to Fears Over Privacy, Abortions and Fertility
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250