Number of Securities Class Actions Against Non-US Issuers Holds Steady for Third Year
"It seems to be an area of high interest in the shareholder plaintiffs' bar in the United States, and I don't see any letup in this particular trend," David Kistenbroker, the managing partner at Dechert in Chicago and global co-leader of the white-collar and securities litigation practice, said in an interview Thursday.
March 19, 2020 at 04:39 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
Approximately 15% of the securities class action suits filed in 2019 were filed against non-U.S. issuers, marking a 2% increase from 2018, according to a recent report published by Dechert.
According to "Non-U.S. Issuers Targeted In Securities Class Actions Files in the United States," 64 of the 404 securities class action lawsuits in 2019 were filed against non-U.S. issuers. In 2018, 54 of the 403 securities class action suits filed, or 13%, were against non-U.S. issuers.
"It seems to be an area of high interest in the shareholder plaintiffs' bar in the United States and I don't see any letup in this particular trend," said David Kistenbroker, the managing partner at Dechert in Chicago and global co-leader of the white-collar and securities litigation practice.
The plaintiffs bar is particularly keen on filing securities suits against biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies based outside of the U.S., according to the report. Eighteen of the 64 suits in 2019 against non-U.S. issuers were against companies in those industries.
Six of the suits filed in 2019 alleged companies misrepresented the prospects of a new drug or product being approved by the Food and Drug Administration.
"The percentage of the companies that get a declination from the FDA is fairly substantial, and it is well known that can cause a rather significant downward movement of the publicly issued stock of those companies," Kistenbroker explained.
He said that kind of downward movement in stock is what the plaintiffs bar is looking for.
In-house counsel, Kistenbroker said, at companies in the biotech and pharmaceutical companies should focus on their internal processes and disclosures.
"They need to make sure they have a robust structure to create those disclosures and make sure their disclosures are as full as possible," Kistenbroker said.
Though not mentioned in the report, Kistenbroker said the new coronavirus will likely contribute to new class action suits against non-U.S. securities issuers throughout 2020.
"We have seen two shareholder class actions filed generally in the United States already," Kistenbroker said. "I think those are just the tip of the iceberg."
Significantly, Kistenbroker said, investors have filed a suit against Norwegian Cruise Line in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida claiming class members were hurt financially by the company allegedly telling passengers that COVID-19 would not affect their trips. Investors have also filed suit against Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania-based Inovio Pharmaceuticals Inc. and its CEO over false statements claiming the biotech firm had developed a COVID-19 vaccine in three hours.
Proper disclosures are important to mitigate the risk of a COVID-19 related securities suit.
"In today's environment, every company should make sure that it disclosures fully and accurately the impact of the coronavirus on their business and operations," Kistenbroker said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFederal Judge Approves Harvard's Dismissal of Chip-Patent Suit Against Samsung
2 minute readSEC Official Hints at More Restraint With Industry Bars, Less With Wells Meetings
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1'Reverse Robin Hood': Capital One Swarmed With Class Actions Alleging Theft of Influencer Commissions in January
- 2Hawaii wildfire victims spared from testifying after last-minute deal over $4B settlement
- 3How We Won It: Latham Secures Back-to-Back ITC Patent Wins for California Companies
- 4Meta agrees to pay $25 million to settle lawsuit from Trump after Jan. 6 suspension
- 5Stevens & Lee Hires Ex-Middle District of Pennsylvania U.S. Attorney as White-Collar Co-Chair
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250