The Law Firm Disrupted: The Great Disruption
Lawyers can be a lifeline in the coronavirus crisis, even if the scope of the need for pro bono services has yet to come into focus.
March 19, 2020 at 09:00 PM
5 minute read
Our world has shifted dramatically in just one week. And with the destabilization introduced by the coronavirus, there's going to ample need for helping others, including with pro bono work. But maybe not quite immediately. Want to weigh in? Email me here. Want this dispatch in your inbox every Thursday? Sign up here.
The Great Disruption
It's here. Last week we were anxiously preparing for what the new reality of remote working would be like. And now I'm trading shifts of childcare/homeschooling with my wife while trying to get my work responsibilities done. (If this was an audio briefing, it would be punctuated by intermittent shrieking.)
My conversations over the past couple of days suggest that lawyers who remain busy have adjusted relatively smoothly to their new arrangements. That's probably also the case for those who have seen their work temporarily dry up—although no one's actually admitted that to me yet.
Nonetheless, others across society have seen their existences disrupted far more than most lawyers and law firm staff: I'm talking about the millions of workers in the restaurant, retail, hospitality and other industries that are seeing paychecks disappear as a result of "social distancing."
Naturally, a crisis of this sort opens up all sorts of pro bono opportunities. Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison jumped quickly into the breach, with chairman Brad Karp's pitch on Saturday to build a resource center that would guide those suddenly in economic need through the maze of relief opportunities.
The Association of Pro Bono Counsel has also been on the case. APBCo President Steve Schulman, the pro bono partner at Akin Gump, has been on a number of calls this week with the roughly 250 attorneys and practice group leaders who run pro bono programs at 120 firms around the world.
He says they've identified three primary work streams:
1) Helping and advising existing pro bono clients in the current climate.
"There are real challenges of remote-working with a client population that is not used to communicating by computer."
2) Offering immediate remote help on issues relating to the pandemic.
Working with hospitals to address the acute legal needs people have during a pandemic: wills and advance directives, for example.
3) Pro bono needs that emerge after the immediate crisis comes to an end.
"Most work is going to happen in the aftermath of this, including legal needs that we haven't identified yet." But one example is what's going to happen with evictions that are currently on hold.
One conclusion is that, unfortunately, it's unrealistic to expect presently idled attorneys to dive right into new pro bono work and make an immediate contribution. That's a slightly different message from Karp, who said that he could use thousands of outside lawyers to support the operation initiated by Paul, Weiss.
It's a different story for those who are already involved in representing clients with existing needs. "If there's work you can do remotely, even if it's not due for several months, take the time you have now to do it," Schulman says.
If the real flood of opportunities isn't going to come for weeks, one blessing is that the pro bono community is more coordinated than it was during the last recession. APBCo has more than twice as many members than it did in 2008.
"As things normalize, we will have the capacity to help," Schulman says.
In the News
➤➤ Just as I was finishing up last week's installment of the Law Firm Disrupted, word emerged from California that the state bar was putting the brakes on regulatory changes, discussed here in the past, that would open the door to fee sharing and outside ownership of law firms, in the name of increasing access to justice. My colleague Cheryl Miller reported that the trustees of the bar tabled recommendations from the state's task force, citing "political headwinds." Indiana University law school professor Bill Henderson, who drafted a report underpinning the conclusions of the task force, offers a typically thoughtful analysis on the failure of "rule makers" to deliver on several high-profile examples of market liberalization.
➤➤ Another group that's been placed at risk by the COVID-19 pandemic: contract attorneys. Above the Law did some crowdsourcing and found that the agencies handling this work have been denying attorneys the opportunity to work from home, even in epicenters for the disease like New York City.
➤➤ And finally, Bob Ambrogi is building a list of products and services offered by companies for free to support the work of legal professionals during the coronavirus crisis. Take a look.
Wash your hands, keep your distance, try your best to stay sane, and you'll hear from me again next Thursday. Thanks again for reading, and please feel free to reach out to me at [email protected]. Sign up here to receive The Law Firm Disrupted as a weekly email.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Law Firm Disrupted: Big Law Profits Vs. Political Values
The Law Firm Disrupted: Quality Partner Training—The Exception or the Rule?
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Church of Scientology Set to Depose Phila. Attorney in Sexual Abuse Case
- 2An AG Just Specified How AI Could Get You in Hot Water
- 3Supreme Court Appears to Lean Toward Letting TikTok Ban Take Effect
- 4Standing Spat: Split 2nd Circuit Lets Challenge to Pfizer Diversity Program Proceed
- 5Judge Jablonski and Chief Justice Rabner Both Acted Completely Properly
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250