Top Law Schools Say Firms Are Pushing to Delay Summer Associate Hiring
Law firms say they want the delay, in part, because a move to to pass/fail grading for the spring semester will muddy the hiring process. It's also unclear whether firms will even be in a position—or have the need—to dispatch partners to law schools for interviews in late summer.
March 23, 2020 at 11:48 AM
5 minute read
On-campus interviews in January? It seems likely.
At least four major Big Law feeder schools have said that law firm summer associate hiring—or OCI—may be moved back from the current late July or early August to further into the coming academic year amid the COVID-19 pandemic. And Columbia Law School informed students on Monday that it is moving it's OCI program to January, making it the first to commit to the change.
The deans at Harvard Law School and Columbia Law School raised that possibility to students in emails Friday that also announced shifts to mandatory pass/fail grading for the spring semester, three days before Columbia officially made the move. In addition, the University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School and New York University School of Law are weighing possible delays to OCI, spokespeople from both campuses confirmed Monday. Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law is also considering alternative OCI dates, said career services dean David Diamond.
"We are considering additional summer research assistant opportunities to help 1L students work with and get to know more faculty, and exploring whether it is feasible to move the law firm hiring process to later in the academic year," wrote Harvard Law dean John Manning in his email to students.
Columbia Law dean Gillian Lester told students in her Friday email that law firms are pushing for a summer associate hiring delay in her email, which acknowledged that some first-year students are concerned that a pass/fail grading system could hurt their employment prospects.
"We have learned that the major New York firms are strongly considering moving EIP, the job-matching process for private law employment, from the summer following the 1L year to January 2021, which may mitigate this concern, at least for 1Ls," Lester wrote, using the shorthand for Columbia's Early Interview Program—the equivalent of OCI.
Columbia's decision to move summer associate interviewing back to January looks likely to create a wave of other schools doing the same. Columbia and Harvard sent more 2019 J.D. graduates into associate jobs at the largest 100 firms than any other law school. Penn Law, which also sends many students into Big Law, is considering moving OCI to January, among other options, said associate director for communications Rebecca Anderson. (Penn has said it will inform students by Wednesday about any changes to its grading system this semester.)
"As the situation continues to evolve, we stand by ready to respond with effective approaches for our students and for the marketplace," Anderson said.
One major factor behind calls for delaying OCI is the move by many top law schools to pass/fail grading for the spring semester.
Columbia; Stanford Law School; the University of California, Berkeley School of Law; Cornell Law School; Duke Law School; and Boston College Law School are among the schools that have moved to a mandatory pass/fail system. The University of Michigan Law School and Georgetown University Law Center are allowing students to choose to be graded under the existing scheme or as pass/fail for the semester.
Harvard had taken the same approach as Michigan until Friday, when Manning informed students that pass/fail grading would be mandatory. Some Harvard law students protested the optional nature of the revised grading system, saying it unfairly benefited students who are experiencing relatively little upheaval amid the closure of campus, the move to online classes, and social distancing measures. They also claimed that faculty were quietly telling students not to take the pass/fail option in order to ensure their job opportunities.
Many administrators at other law schools have told students that they are considering moving to pass/fail grading, and more such announcements are expected this week.
But pass/fail grading this semester will make it harder for law firms to hire summer associates if on-campus interviewing is not delayed, according to Gavin White, the global hiring partner at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom.
White said in an interview last week that law firms want to see two semesters of grades when hiring summer associates—which isn't possible when schools are only issuing pass/fail grades this semester. Moving summer associate hiring into January or February would allow firms to take into account grades earned in a candidate's first semester of their second year, he said.
"If you only have one semester of grades, it's hard to get a meaningful and realistic assessment of someone's academic performance," White said.
Beyond the grading issue, law firms themselves are dealing with major uncertainty about their own businesses now that they are largely operating online. It's unclear whether firms will even be in a position—or have the need—to dispatch partners to law schools for interviews in late summer.
Typically, law firms will come to campuses to interview incoming 2Ls in late July or early August. But the coronavirus looks likely to force a delay in the start of the upcoming summer associate programs, meaning that those programs could still be in full swing as firms are simultaneously trying to conduct interviews at law schools—a tall order given that firms as also facing unprecedented disruptions in their normal operations.
Both Manning and Lester said their decisions have been guided by a desire to reduce the stress and anxiety that law students are feeling right now.
"At this moment, when you have so much to cope with and deal with, we thought it important for you to be devoting your mental and emotional energy to something other than worrying about whether to opt into [pass/fail] for the semester," Manning's email reads.
Read more -
Advice to Law Students in the Time of Covid-19: Your Path to Big Law
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUniversity of Chicago Accused of Evicting Student for Attending Gaza-Israel Protest
3 minute readSanctioned Penn Law Professor Amy Wax Sues University, Alleging Discrimination
5 minute readThe Met Hires GC of Elite University as Next Legal Chief
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Reviewing Judge Merchan's Unconditional Discharge
- 2With New Civil Jury Selection Rule, Litigants Should Carefully Weigh Waiver Risks
- 3Young Lawyers Become Old(er) Lawyers
- 4Caught In the In Between: A Legal Roadmap for the Sandwich Generation
- 5Top 10 Developments, Lessons, and Reminders of 2024
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250