Top Law Schools Say Firms Are Pushing to Delay Summer Associate Hiring
Law firms say they want the delay, in part, because a move to to pass/fail grading for the spring semester will muddy the hiring process. It's also unclear whether firms will even be in a position—or have the need—to dispatch partners to law schools for interviews in late summer.
March 23, 2020 at 11:48 AM
5 minute read
On-campus interviews in January? It seems likely.
At least four major Big Law feeder schools have said that law firm summer associate hiring—or OCI—may be moved back from the current late July or early August to further into the coming academic year amid the COVID-19 pandemic. And Columbia Law School informed students on Monday that it is moving it's OCI program to January, making it the first to commit to the change.
The deans at Harvard Law School and Columbia Law School raised that possibility to students in emails Friday that also announced shifts to mandatory pass/fail grading for the spring semester, three days before Columbia officially made the move. In addition, the University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School and New York University School of Law are weighing possible delays to OCI, spokespeople from both campuses confirmed Monday. Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law is also considering alternative OCI dates, said career services dean David Diamond.
"We are considering additional summer research assistant opportunities to help 1L students work with and get to know more faculty, and exploring whether it is feasible to move the law firm hiring process to later in the academic year," wrote Harvard Law dean John Manning in his email to students.
Columbia Law dean Gillian Lester told students in her Friday email that law firms are pushing for a summer associate hiring delay in her email, which acknowledged that some first-year students are concerned that a pass/fail grading system could hurt their employment prospects.
"We have learned that the major New York firms are strongly considering moving EIP, the job-matching process for private law employment, from the summer following the 1L year to January 2021, which may mitigate this concern, at least for 1Ls," Lester wrote, using the shorthand for Columbia's Early Interview Program—the equivalent of OCI.
Columbia's decision to move summer associate interviewing back to January looks likely to create a wave of other schools doing the same. Columbia and Harvard sent more 2019 J.D. graduates into associate jobs at the largest 100 firms than any other law school. Penn Law, which also sends many students into Big Law, is considering moving OCI to January, among other options, said associate director for communications Rebecca Anderson. (Penn has said it will inform students by Wednesday about any changes to its grading system this semester.)
"As the situation continues to evolve, we stand by ready to respond with effective approaches for our students and for the marketplace," Anderson said.
One major factor behind calls for delaying OCI is the move by many top law schools to pass/fail grading for the spring semester.
Columbia; Stanford Law School; the University of California, Berkeley School of Law; Cornell Law School; Duke Law School; and Boston College Law School are among the schools that have moved to a mandatory pass/fail system. The University of Michigan Law School and Georgetown University Law Center are allowing students to choose to be graded under the existing scheme or as pass/fail for the semester.
Harvard had taken the same approach as Michigan until Friday, when Manning informed students that pass/fail grading would be mandatory. Some Harvard law students protested the optional nature of the revised grading system, saying it unfairly benefited students who are experiencing relatively little upheaval amid the closure of campus, the move to online classes, and social distancing measures. They also claimed that faculty were quietly telling students not to take the pass/fail option in order to ensure their job opportunities.
Many administrators at other law schools have told students that they are considering moving to pass/fail grading, and more such announcements are expected this week.
But pass/fail grading this semester will make it harder for law firms to hire summer associates if on-campus interviewing is not delayed, according to Gavin White, the global hiring partner at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom.
White said in an interview last week that law firms want to see two semesters of grades when hiring summer associates—which isn't possible when schools are only issuing pass/fail grades this semester. Moving summer associate hiring into January or February would allow firms to take into account grades earned in a candidate's first semester of their second year, he said.
"If you only have one semester of grades, it's hard to get a meaningful and realistic assessment of someone's academic performance," White said.
Beyond the grading issue, law firms themselves are dealing with major uncertainty about their own businesses now that they are largely operating online. It's unclear whether firms will even be in a position—or have the need—to dispatch partners to law schools for interviews in late summer.
Typically, law firms will come to campuses to interview incoming 2Ls in late July or early August. But the coronavirus looks likely to force a delay in the start of the upcoming summer associate programs, meaning that those programs could still be in full swing as firms are simultaneously trying to conduct interviews at law schools—a tall order given that firms as also facing unprecedented disruptions in their normal operations.
Both Manning and Lester said their decisions have been guided by a desire to reduce the stress and anxiety that law students are feeling right now.
"At this moment, when you have so much to cope with and deal with, we thought it important for you to be devoting your mental and emotional energy to something other than worrying about whether to opt into [pass/fail] for the semester," Manning's email reads.
Read more -
Advice to Law Students in the Time of Covid-19: Your Path to Big Law
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Everything From A to Z': University GCs Tested by Legal, Financial, Societal Challenges
6 minute read'A Horrible Reputation for Bad Verdicts': Plaintiffs Attorney Breaks Down $129M Wrongful-Death Verdict From Conservative Venue
How Uncertainty in College Athletics Compensation Could Drive Lawsuits in 2025
'Basic Arithmetic': Court Rules in Favor of LA Charter School Denied Funding by California Education Department
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Legaltech Rundown: Level Legal Hires Onit Co-Founder, Nextpoint Brings on AI Expert Dr. Dave Lewis, and More
- 2Florida Bankruptcy Court Announces Early Closure
- 3Risk Mitigation: Employee Engagement Results in Fewer Lawsuits (and Other Benefits)
- 4How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'Be a Good Partner and Colleague,' Says Logan Drew of Robins Kaplan
- 5People in the News—Dec. 20, 2024—Messa & Associates, Saxton & Stump
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250