Mayer Brown's Efforts to Reopen in Hong Kong Walked Back After Employees Raise Concerns
Mayer Brown's earlier decision to reopen its Hong Kong office was met with criticism from some employees as the number of cases of the coronavirus began to spike again in the region. The firm reinstated its work-from-home policy Monday.
March 24, 2020 at 07:34 PM
4 minute read
A letter sent to Mayer Brown management in Hong Kong that criticized the firm for the way it has handled issues related to the coronavirus pandemic illustrates the heightened level of concern among employees as businesses and law firms in Hong Kong try to come back from their work-from-home policies.
The letter, sent anonymously and seen by Law.com International, specifically addresses Mayer Brown's policy, which has since been rescinded, calling for lawyers and staff to return to work in the Hong Kong office unless they have permission from their supervisor to continue to work from home. That policy has been in place for a few weeks, but the letter was written Sunday as the number of cases in the region spiked.
"You are putting us, our families and our communities at risk for no good reason," the letter's authors wrote.
Mayer Brown responded in a statement, however, that it quickly reinstated its work-from-home policy Monday, the day after the letter was written and as reports of cases spiking made their way into the news.
The letter, delivered to the firm over the weekend, was sent as Hong Kong's efforts to contain the spread of COVID-19 have begun to backslide. The city had managed to stave off a runaway outbreak of the deadly virus in part because the public has been diligent about wearing face masks, washing hands and maintaining social distancing. But in the last week, the number of confirmed cases has almost doubled as Hong Kong residents who had left for North America and Europe began to return, bringing the virus back with them. As of Wednesday, Hong Kong will attempt to stop the number of new cases by banning all non-Hong Kong residents from entering the country.
The issues raised in the letter also portend scenarios that could arise in the U.S., Europe and elsewhere when restrictions are lifted and firms attempt to return to normal.
The letter blasted Mayer Brown for telling lawyers and staff that they should return to work in the office. It also said the firm had failed to provide any support to those employees who had children at home. Hong Kong's schools have been closed during the crisis and are not expected to reopen until late April.
"We want to express our dismay at the position the firm continues to maintain in the face of a global pandemic. You insist that we still come to work despite a grand majority of other Hong Kong firms, companies and government offices providing the option for employees to work from home," the letter said.
Mayer Brown said in a statement that the Hong Kong office returned to a full voluntary work-from-home policy Monday.
The firm said that as the COVID-19 crisis spread to Hong Kong from the mainland, it enacted a work-from-home policy in Hong Kong that continued until mid-February. However, when many government agencies and businesses in Hong Kong, including law firms, began resuming operations in their offices, it did as well.
The statement noted that conditions in Hong Kong deteriorated rapidly. "The health and safety of our people—each and every one of us— takes priority over everything else and is the only factor in play as our local leaders react in real time to a rapidly unfolding global human tragedy," the firm said.
Mayer Brown spokesman John Tuerck also confirmed Hong Kong press reports that an employee of the Hong Kong office has tested positive for COVID-19 and has been hospitalized—one of 39 new confirmed cases added Monday. He said the employee had not been in the Hong Kong office since early March.
Mayer Brown has approximately 200 lawyers based in Hong Kong, according to the firm's website.
Lisa Shuchman contributed to this story
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllContract Software Unicorn Ironclad Hires Former Pinterest Lawyer as GC
2 minute readFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250