How 3 Law Firms Are Using Tech to Respond to COVID-19 Disruption
As the COVID-19 pandemic throws businesses into a tailspin, some law firms are developing dedicated legal tech tools to address rapidly changing client needs.
March 25, 2020 at 10:00 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Legal Tech News
Industries across the globe are still trying to wrap their minds around the fallout from the COVID-19 pandemic—and legal is no exception. As law firms attempt to ramp up a series of easily digestible legal resources for clients struggling to understand their obligations in a climate dominated by lock-downs and shelter-in-place orders, some are also joining tech companies in releasing innovation solutions in response to the pandemic.
Here are three law firms that have rolled out new tech-enabled services in the face of COVID-19.
|Mayer Brown
While rapid response has long been a selling point of the Mayer Brown's crisis management team, partner Elizabeth Espin Stern indicated that keeping up with the pace of COVID-19 required a technological assist. The publicly available Global Traveler Navigator tool, for instance, repurposes the framework built for the firm's existing Brexit decision tool to track travel, visa, quarantine or health checks around the globe. Espin Stern posited that the firm could utilize a similar "living map" format to help companies track the nuances of individual shelter-in-place orders as they unfold across the 50 states. "We really have to be in the trenches with our clients helping them problem solve every second," Espin Stern said. The firm also continues to dispense COVID-19 related legal guidance and analysis via a dedicated web portal and blog that were launched last week alongside the Navigator tool.
|Wilson Sonsini
Wilson Sonsini's tech subsidiary SixFifty unveiled its publicly available "COVID-19 Toolset" on Wednesday featuring two solutions focused specifically on the employment-related issues stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic. "We looked at our own COVID-19 preparedness for SixFifty and we thought 'geez, how do you even navigate this?' How do you transition your workforce to work remotely without running into all these other employment laws?" said Kimball Parker, CEO of SixFify. Apparently you leverage framework from an existing General Data Protection Regulation compliance tool to fast-track a questionnaire-based workflow solution that — among other things — can help identify employees who may have been exposed to COVID-19 and the co-workers with whom they've been in proximity. A second tool allows companies to automatically generate COVID-19 adjusted policies around extended sick leave, travel, telecommuting and reimbursement. Those policies were tailored with the help of Wilson Sonsini employment attorneys and designed to be broad enough to cover the vast majority of state and federal guidelines. "If there's a new federal law that changes some aspect of working from or extended sick leave, for example, we'll work with Wilson Sonsini to tweak the policies and update them for free," Parker said.
|Dentons
In addition to it's US COVID-19/Pandemic Special Situations Team, global law firm Dentons has rolled out a number of tech solutions geared towards helping businesses maneuver any legal complications that may arise from the outbreak. It's online COVID-19 Hub breaks down insights on the potential economic fallout, travel bans and even the impact on real estate down by country. Along similar lines, the firm's Global Labor and Enforcement tracker allows businesses to view how their obligations to employees differently across global markets. There's also a webinar on force majeure for good measure.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readEuropean, US Litigation Funding Experts Look for Commonalities at NYU Event
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250