Inside Track: How Legal Departments Are Proving Their Companies Are Doing 'Essential Business'
In-house lawyers are helping their companies navigate the novel coronavirus pandemic by proving they're doing what is now termed as 'essential business,' which means a company can still operate at relatively normal capacity if it is providing necessities to the public. Also, the countless emails from Big Law firms about COVID-19 webinars are not working for some in-house counsel, according to a viral tweet.
March 25, 2020 at 06:05 PM
4 minute read
Over the last week, 18 states, including New York and California, placed a "shelter in place" policy for millions of residents to avoid spreading the COVID-19 coronavirus. With the pandemic gripping the globe, in-house counsel are trying to find ways to keep business operations afloat, and one question that's been coming up is whether a company is an "essential business."
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security through its Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency released an order identifying an essential business as part of the "critical infrastructure industry," as in providing health care services, pharmaceutical needs and food supply.
In-house counsel have to stay on top of the news as it changes every day, lawyers told Corporate Counsel. One responsibility in-house counsel can do is provide essential service letters for employees to carry in transit and letters for facility personnel to hand to inspectors in case of a facility visit, according to Thomas Lee, a Bryan Cave partner in San Francisco.
How has your company been affected as a "nonessential business?" Or how did you help your company keep operating as an "essential business?" Let me know at [email protected].
"'Force majeure.' I've heard that phrase more in the last three days than in my 30 years of law practice."
Louis Chodoff, a partner at Ballard Spahr in Cherry Hill, New Jersey, told Corporate Counsel in our second story covering the increase in force majeure claims in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.
|
What's Happening
In High Demand
To combat the shortage of N95 masks and other necessary medical supplies, President Donald Trump issued an executive order under the Defense Production Act of 1950. The order allows the federal government to require manufacturers to distribute their supplies to the government amid the growing COVID-19 pandemic.
In-house counsel at companies that make or can make medical supplies are now helping their companies control the high production rate for these supplies. Angela Styles at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld said many companies over the years have sent their production of N95 masks overseas, so there's uncertainty on how the law will impact supplies not made in the U.S.
China had restricted exports of N95 masks to handle its outbreak. If an order can't be fulfilled, Robert Tompkins at Holland & Knight said contractors should advise that the foreign supply chain could impact the ability to fulfill an order and consider rejecting the order.
A major hurdle goes back to the "shelter in place" orders with employees unable to work in facilities to help manufacturers fulfill these government contracts.
Enough Already!
Is your inbox inundated with invitations for COVID-19 webinars from law firms? It turns out some in-house counsel are already tired of being asked to join webinars.
What do in-house counsel need instead? Apparently, a one-pager on the COVID-19 legal issues of the day, according to a Twitter thread that went viral that had in-house counsel and Big Law partners chiming in.
More Time, Please?
Trade organizations and companies such as United Parcel Service and National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies wrote a letter to California Attorney General Xavier Becerra asking for the July 1 enforcement date of the California Consumer Privacy Act to be pushed back.
The reason? The novel coronavirus pandemic has interrupted business operations to the point some companies are already laying off employees to avoid economic devastation. Also, in-house counsel are still waiting for clarification on the enforcement rules.
|
On the Move
Avis Budget Group said its longtime general counsel and executive vice president Michael Tucker is leaving as the car rental industry faces immediate revenue losses related to the novel coronavirus. Tucker will be replaced by corporate secretary Jean Sera, who has been with Avis since 2006.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllInside Track: How 2 Big Financial Stories—an Antitrust Case and a Megamerger—Became Intertwined
Inside Track: Lawyers for Big Tech Give Harris Benefit of Doubt, Despite Pummeling They Took Under Biden
Inside Track: Late-Career In-House Leaders Offer Words to Live by
Inside Track: ESG Movement Hits 'Teenage Years,' Testing Companies' Resolve
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250