US AG Barr Seeks to Expand Home Confinement to Halt Coronavirus Spread in Federal Prisons
Barr's directive came as two federal jails in Manhattan and Brooklyn had each reported their first confirmed cases of COVID-19, the illness caused by the new coronavirus, and the Justice Department faced increasing calls to reduce the number of vulnerable inmates who might contract the virus.
March 26, 2020 at 05:42 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
U.S. Attorney General William Barr on Thursday directed the federal Bureau of Prisons to begin identifying older and medically at-risk inmates for release to home confinement, as officials address the spread of the novel coronavirus inside the agency's 122 facilities.
Barr's directive came as two federal jails in Manhattan and Brooklyn had each reported their first confirmed cases of COVID-19, the potentially deadly respiratory illness caused by the new coronavirus, and the Justice Department faced increasing calls to reduce the number of vulnerable inmates who might contract the virus.
One inmate at Brooklyn's Metropolitan Detention Center had been treated and released by a local hospital, while another at the Metropolitan Correctional Center across the river in Manhattan remained isolated with cold symptoms, Barr said. Facilities in Atlanta and Oakdale, Louisiana, had also reported cases among prisoners, including one who remained hospitalized in critical condition.
All four institutions had been put on lockdown, per BOP protocol, and the agency was investigating contacts the sickened inmates may have had with other prisoners or staff, Barr said.
In remarks during a virtual press conference, Barr said the BOP was considering expanding the use of home confinement for older inmates with underlying health conditions, who had served "substantial parts" of their sentence and no longer posed a threat to the public.
According to Barr, about 10,000 of the nation's approximately 167,000 federal inmates were over the age of 60 and one-third suffered from preexisting medical conditions.
Part of the calculus, he said, was assessing whether inmates would be safer under home confinement than they were inside prison walls, and any prisoner eligible for release would be subject to a 14-day quarantine period to ensure that they don't spread the virus to the broader community.
"But we are now in the process of trying to expand home confinement as part of, you know, trying to control this infection," Barr told reporters on a live video conference Thursday morning.
The BOP has established a task force to deal with the growing coronavirus crisis, and earlier this month closed federal facilities to outside visitors. Barr said new inmates and staff were being screened for symptoms, and new arrivals to the jails were being placed under a two-week quarantine.
The Federal Defenders of New York, however, has argued that those steps did not go far enough to protect inmates from contracting the virus, which had accounted for more than 1,100 deaths in U.S. as of Thursday afternoon.
David Patton, the group's executive director, said Thursday that even if the new guidance were implemented quickly, it likely would have little effect on jails such as MCC and MDC, where the "vast majority" of inmates have not yet been sentenced and "do not appear to be subject to the new guidance."
"We have more than 700 people in those two jails combined who meet the CDC's vulnerability criteria based on age or medical condition," he said in an emailed statement. "The new guidance will likely only impact a tiny fraction of them."
"The clock is ticking," Patton said.
The Federal Defenders has been pursuing emergency bail applications on a case-by-case basis, but attorneys have run into opposition from the Manhattan U.S. Attorney's Office, which has opposed most, if not all, of those requests.
The group was continuing to push for a more comprehensive approach to help speed the release of vulnerable inmates, including the creation of a committee to identify categories of high-risk detainees and more efficiently review requests.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Judicial Nominee Advances While Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden Picks
4 minute readAuditor Finds 'Significant Deficiency' in FTC Accounting to Tune of $7M
4 minute readTrump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
'Radical Left Judges'?: Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden's Judicial Picks
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250