In an Effort to Avoid Layoffs, Marshall Dennehey Halts Retirement Matching
President and CEO Mark Thompson said response from the firm has been overwhelmingly positive in a time when some other law firms have already cut staff.
March 30, 2020 at 03:32 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Legal Intelligencer
With the novel coronavirus taking a harsh toll on global markets and businesses small and large, one law firm is trying to avoid the layoffs and cuts that are trickling in around the industry by targeting its retirement-related expenses.
Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin president and CEO Mark Thompson announced in a firmwide email Monday that it is suspending its 4% employer 401(k) match until next year. The policy is effective May 1.
The plan is the only retirement option offered firmwide and has around an 80% participation rate among the firm's 1,200 employees, Thompson said. Thompson did not disclose how much the policy will save, and said that he fully expects the matching to return in 2021.
"We're trying to offset these losses and live up to our family values and keep everybody together. This was a measure we could take as an alternative to layoffs and pay cuts," he said.
As of now, the firm is still relatively busy, Thompson said: it has recently opened 845 files, processed $4 million in invoices and submitted over 150 appeals. Thompson said because it is a litigation firm, Marshall Dennehey will be hit less hard than other, transaction-heavy firms. He even expects new matters to grow in areas such as insurance coverage.
But the firm has not been spared of the effects of COVID-19 and the policy mechanisms deployed to combat its spread, like social distancing and the shuttering of nonessential businesses. Thompson said collections are down as clients have begun to put off billing or negotiate lower rates; courts are closed as are jury trials in nearly all jurisdictions. The firm also spent money to transition its entire 1,000-plus-employee workforce to a remote setup for 20 offices in six states, an arrangement that Thompson believes will lead to an inevitable drop in productivity.
"The fact of the matter is that we're facing some impediments that haven't come to fruition yet," Thompson said. "We're proud [of our remote transition], but it just isn't optimal. Our productivity will inevitably decline given the disruption and billing with the courts closed."
Despite these challenges, Thompson and firm leadership have deep reservations about cutting head count or salaries. While suspending 401(k) matching will not fully cover the revenue the firm anticipates it will lose, Thompson said he does not anticipate firm layoffs. He said he prides the firm on having a family environment, and he loathes the idea of a laid-off employee losing their health insurance in midst of a public health crisis.
The response from employees, Thompson said, has been overwhelmingly positive in light of the cuts that have already been announced across the industry. Last week, Law.com reported that several firms in New York had made staff cuts: Goldberg Segalla—which, like Marshall Dennehey, is an Am Law 200 firm focused on insurance defense—as well as Belkin Burden Goldman, Robinson Brog Leinwand Greene Genovese & Gluck and Heiberger & Associates.
Law.com reported Monday that Womble Bond Dickinson has begun laying off associates and staff. The firm also reportedly announced a 10% pay cut for anybody making over $100,000 and a smaller cut for those making between $50,000 and $100,000.
Meanwhile, Reed Smith confirmed Monday that it will be "slowing" partner distributions because of the economic effects of the coronavirus.
"There are a lot of people looking around to our peers and competitors and have seen people laid off. It has caused a lot of angst," Thompson said. "We have received expressions of gratitude. Some people told them the email made them cry, that they're proud of the firm. People are scared and we're trying to give them one less thing to worry about."
|Read More
Reed Smith Will 'Slow' Partner Pay In Response To COVID-19 Pressures
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDavis Polk Lands Spirit Chapter 11 Amid Bankruptcy Resurgence
Companies' Dirty Little Secret: Those Privacy Opt-Out Requests Usually Aren't Honored
Ballooning Workloads, Dearth of Advancement Opportunities Prime In-House Attorneys to Pull Exit Hatch
What Practices Are Driving Law Firms’ ‘Remarkable’ Performance in 2024?
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Trump's SEC Likely to Halt 'Off-Channel' Texting Probe That's Led to Billions in Fines
- 2Special Section: Products Liability, Mass Torts & Class Action/Personal Injury
- 3The Elliott Management vs. Southwest Airlines Faceoff: Who Won and What Determined the Outcome?
- 4November Court of Appeals Roundup
- 5Trellis Launches Trellis AI, a New Suite of Automated Litigation Tools
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250