Critical Mass: Leading Plaintiffs' Firms Prepping for Onslaught of COVID-19 Lawsuits. Pandemic Prompts Pharmacies to Postpone Deadlines in Opioid Case.
Prominent plaintiffs' firms are starting to file a wide range of lawsuits over COVID-19.
April 01, 2020 at 12:38 PM
5 minute read
Welcome to Critical Mass, Law.com's weekly briefing for class action and mass tort attorneys. I hope everyone is staying safe and healthy. Prominent plaintiffs' firms are starting to file a wide range of lawsuits over COVID-19. And pharmacies, citing their own roles in the pandemic, want a 60-day delay of deadlines in the opioid case set for trial. Meanwhile, which firms sued Zoom over alleged privacy violations?
Feel free to reach out to me with your input. You can email me at [email protected], or follow me on Twitter: @abronstadlaw.
Prominent Plaintiffs' Firms Pounce on Pandemic Suits
Prominent plaintiffs' firms are filing lawsuits over COVID-19, with DiCello Levitt and Bursor & Fisher bringing class actions on Friday against 24 Hour Fitness and the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of customers who want their money back.
Meanwhile, Milberg Phillips Grossman, Sanders Phillips Grossman and Greg Coleman Law teamed up to create a Coronavirus Litigation Task Force, which involves about 30 attorneys. That group will focus on workers' compensation, insurance coverage, products liability involving protective gear and class actions, such as antitrust and consumer fraud—areas already spawning lawsuits over alleged price gouging and invalid health claims.
I asked Tina Bullock [Sanders Phillips Grossman] which cases she expected her team to file first. Here's what she said:
"I would think the products would come before some of the business interruption claims, but they're both moving so fast it's like a legal pandemic. A lot of our attorneys are working literally night and day on this, and it's hard to predict how fast. Usually it takes us a week or two to draft a complaint, and the speed of this is moving as the urgency of trying to protect people would prompt us to act much faster."
Amid COVID-19, Pharmacies Seek Opioid Case Delays
Citing their roles as "essential businesses" in the COVID-19 outbreak, a group of pharmacies have asked a federal judge to delay upcoming depositions and discovery deadlines in a leading opioid case against them by 60 more days. The pharmacies, which include CVS and Rite Aid, are set to go to trial on Nov. 9.
Lawyers on the plaintiffs' executive committee opposed the motion but suggested that counsel "hold the current litigation deadlines" and reevaluate the situation on April 20.
U.S. District Judge Dan Polster hasn't ruled yet, but, on Monday, special master David Cohen emailed lawyers saying he would not extend deadlines for document production. But he did say:
"Regarding depositions, the court believes it is likely there will need to be deadline extensions, but the court will wait and assess this on April 28, 2020."
Who Got the Work?
Video-conferencing company Zoom Video Communications was hit with two class actions alleging its service, which has become ubiquitous as more employees work from home, is illegally disclosing personal information to Facebook and others. Both were filed this week in California's Northern District. Mark Tamblyn and Kenneth Wexler (Wexler Wallace) and Daniel Gustafson, David Goodwin and Ling Wang (Gustafson Gluek), filed a case on Monday, and Hassan Zavareei, Katherine Aizpuru and Annick Persinger (Tycko & Zavareei) filed another on Tuesday.
Here's what else is happening:
Dicamba Demur: Bayer moved to toss last month's $265 million dicamba verdict, citing the jury's "novel theory" that Monsanto could be held liable for the actions of third parties involving another company's herbicide. In motions filed on Friday, Bayer also called the $250 million in punitive damages excessive, unconstitutional and "the result of passion and prejudice." The trial was the first to find that dicamba herbicides made by Monsanto and BASF, another defendant, drifted into neighboring fields, damaging crops.
Postmates Sues: In the latest skirmish between Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher and Keller Lenkner, Postmates has sued more than 10,000 of the delivery service's carriers for filing multiple arbitration demands in order to "extract a ransom-style settlement." In February, Keller Lenkner, which represents the Postmates carriers, won a motion to compel in a similar case involving 6,000 carriers for DoorDash, another Gibson Dunn client.
Apple Slices: In her latest ruling to address standing to sue in a class action, U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh partially dismissed a case alleging Apple deceived customers into overpaying for iCloud subscriptions since their content was stored by Amazon, Microsoft, Google and others that offered cheaper services. On Friday, Koh found that class members who did not actually pay for a subscription did not have standing to pursue injunctive relief. Beatriz Mejia, Matthew Brown and Lauren Pomeroy (Cooley) represented Apple against plaintiffs' attorneys Roy Katriel (The Katriel Law Firm) and Azra Mehdi (The Mehdi Firm).
Thanks for reading Critical Mass! I'll be back next week.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Stevens & Lee Names New Delaware Shareholder
- 2U.S. Supreme Court Denies Trump Effort to Halt Sentencing
- 3From CLO to President: Kevin Boon Takes the Helm at Mysten Labs
- 4How Law Schools Fared on California's July 2024 Bar Exam
- 5'Discordant Dots': Why Phila. Zantac Judge Rejected Bid for His Recusal
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250